Jump to content

smellybug

Members
  • Posts

    117
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by smellybug

  1. A person in my program switched from a PhD in Comp Lit at Davis, so that's not a stellar recommendation. But it depends what you're doing. Their program is insanely small and there's no way my interests would fit. Maybe yours will. As with all UCs that are not Berkeley or Los Angeles, get a clear picture of funding. I've heard their funding is not guaranteed, which, if true, is definitely a reason to cross them off your list.
  2. You should also know that almost all programs (at least I've never heard of one where this was not true) will allow you to take your language classes pass/fail, so you don't need to worry about the grade.
  3. It depends on the school, so do your research. I had an "advanced" knowledge of one language (just three years coursework), was working on a second Slavic language, and got into plenty of programs. For some programs that wouldn't have been enough, but I didn't apply to those programs. One program actually told me that the WS was much more important because you can learn a language but you can't learn how to have passion and original ideas.
  4. As someone who's learned three languages as an adult, I can't help but wonder why on earth a scholar and writer would want to avoid language requirements. In fact, I switched to Comparative Literature after kicking and screaming my way through an English program's language requirement. Only then did I realize how important second and third and fourth languages are. I understand that it takes a lot of time, but it will be useful in ways you probably can't imagine. Learning languages gives one a new relationship to language and culture and allows for better scholarship (i.e. access to original sources). No culture was created in a vacuum, especially not in the US! I'm an Americanist and find language acquisition crucial to this field. And, as folks have pointed out, reading knowledge is different and, arguably, easier to acquire than speaking. Plus, some programs are willing to send you overseas to do this work during the summer. Bottom line of your worst case scenario: You'd spend a year or two doing coursework and then be able to read Spanish folktales or German folktales or Native American folktales! How awesome is that? I'd urge everyone to reconsider the language requirements as a good opportunity to be paid to do something you might not be able to do at any other point in your life.
  5. I just don't get it. What are they going to do, send you a postcard at your new school? Don't burn bridges. Be nice.
  6. Our funding is guaranteed for at least five years. I would research this and not accept any offers without this guarantee.
  7. We teach English comp, world literature, and a language if we are able/want to.
  8. Dear GraduatingPhD, Is there a reason you've made this post in FOUR different places? I am starting to think that your intentions are not to warn anyone so much as they are something else. Confused, Smellybug
  9. Dear GraduatingPhD, Is there a reason you've made this post in FOUR different places? I am starting to think that your intentions are not to warn anyone so much as they are something else. Confused, Smellybug
  10. Uh. I know/hope this is sarcasm, but please don't buy into this. If grad school is such misery, don't do it. It's not like it's going to set up a solid future or anything.
  11. I second the Culler introduction to lit. theory. I still refer back to it. It's waaaaay easier to start with a secondary source that contextualizes movements than to just crack open the Norton and read willy-nilly.
  12. In my programs (English and Comp Lit) it's a lot, definitely well over a third. English might be even more so, since they are more selective and highly ranked. However, I've come to view this as more representitive of the kind of applicant that comes from those schools, rather than an inherent bias towards the schools per se (although this probably does play a role). I honestly think that few applicants who came out of my school could have put together the application that I did. Resources are few there and we didn't have many models.
  13. GO. And be aware that you are selling yourself! Edit: Just realized you're already going. Assuming you are interesting, fun, and nice, be yourself. Otherwise, be someone else who is. Enthusiasm goes a long way. Be interested. Know that connections might help you, but be genuine.
  14. (For the schools I was accepted to last year) What I had: publications, conference presentations, pretty good writing sample, connections with faculty members (visits or phone calls), interesting/ unusual project on minor literatures, great GRE scores, great recs, 4.0 in Master's program, individual research for project (I.e. dedication) What I didn't have: prestigious undergrad, prestigious MA, prominent rec writers, great undergrad GPA, traditional background Who knows what it was that got me into programs. In all likelihood, some of the things that kept me out of one program helped get me into another...
  15. This should be bumped this year and every year around this time...
  16. Last year Davis sent me an email AFTER April 15th to ask if I was still available. (I wasn't.) it's not over until it's over, pals!
  17. ] I'm from SoCal, too, and the only real answer is that it's cold, really, really, really cold. But all of these college towns aren't like the Midwest proper. It doesn't really feel all that different. You'll find more white people and less diversity overall, but there are lots of campus groups to join. I visited Urbana last year and it's flat, like the Midwest is, which is weird when you're used to hills. But it's a super cool place. Unlike SoCal you don't need a car. And Chicago's just a train ride away.
  18. It seems that everyone in my cohort feels like they were accepted to this awesome program because of some quota they fill, be it with regards to ethnicity, class, race, or whatever. (I actually fill several nontraditional quotas--a bonus!) I mention this because WE ALL feel like we got into this crazy good school because of a fluke. Even those who are wealthy and white-ish. What I have noticed is that the wealthy and white-ish don't question it as much because they have models that have done it. You may not. In my family I don't. And that leaves me with a lot of splainin' to do. The more you have to do that, I think, the more that you begin to question it. So yes, your fear is absolutely totally normal and doesn't necessarily mean you shouldn't do it. But you should know that people may talk different than you do. It's just a matter of training. They got it from grade school on and you (presumably) didn't. Don't let that make you feel dumb. It's just a bunch of words and what matters is your brain. And I, for one, think that working in a grocery store or factory or food service actually makes you better equipped to understand this stuff. Because you have a material understanding of the world divorced from academia. A lot of people don't. Your voice is special. Since you're not invested in the whole TT thing, I say go for it. They're PAYING you to do it, for Christssake. Take the money and the books and run.
  19. Seriously, you're okay. The three people who actually read the email will forget in a week, if they haven't already.
  20. Michigan holds an unofficial wait list until the very last person has accepted. Often this doesn't happen until early April. But they do send out rejections, so if you haven't received one you're still in the running.
  21. I got publications in between and mentioned it. I just emailed and said that I would like to inform them of a recent publication and look forward to hearing from them.
  22. I have idea what any of this means. I guess I should probably stay away from sports metaphors.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use