In Post-Kantian Continental thought the thing-in-itself is not knowable, we are always limited by our historically situated human perspective. Thus, the focus on "illustrating monolithic concepts" and "abstract, normative categories" which dominate our vision, worldview, whatever. The "inherently plural" world is inherently inaccessible in some ways it's objects are never fully graspable. Nonetheless, "the hipster" as some kind of useful abstraction is fucking stupid. Is archaeology so absorbed by the hard sciences that it doesn't engage with social theory? I often forget how different archaeology and physical anthropology can be from cultural/social anthro.