HealthPolicyPhD

Hi Bobby, I'm sorry to hear you didn't get the score you wanted -- there is literally nothing worse! What are you currently using to study/ when is the last time you can take the GRE before applications are due? I have found that my practice is exactly what my score ends up being. I took the GRE twice and both times it reflected my recent practice scores. Both times I had quant experimental sections.

Hi Chewbacca1, Overall, I would place you at a 3. Your Argument essay (3 or 3.5) is much stronger than your Issue and shows a stronger command of language/syntax. In the Issue task, there are a number of mispellings and grammatical errors (ex: "be wit others" or "be with others") and your points are somewhat unclear. While I understand what you are trying to say in the intro paragraph, your language choice is repetitive and syntax is a bit awkward (ex: the word "their" is used 5 times). You also assume that a leader is someone who governs, while a leader can also simply be someone who inspires others (like a teacher). "Leaders throughout history have all lead in their own way. Some do their best on their own, while others create the best solutions with their people by their side. Regardless, understanding the minds of citizens around you is a key aspect to governing." Could be rewritten as: Leadership styles have differed throughout history - from tyrannical kings to revolution-inspiring rebels. While some lead best alone, others create collaborative solutions and value the feedback of peers. In the end, however, leaders who fail to understand the needs of constituents fail their communities.

I would grade this as a 3.5 or 4. You have a fairly good command of language and organization of thought is clear. There area few sentences where ideas are not clearly expressed and grammar/ syntax feels muddled (ex: For example, if company offers good quality with low cost makes it obvious for them to gain from it. If they plan not to increase rates and check whether it generates money or not. Clearly, store won't get to know whether prices they offer is very low with respect to operating expenses which would have been damaging revenue since long time. The argument could have been much clearer if it explicitly stated that it was tested before which did not end well). Your writing and vocabulary is strong, but there are some consistent grammatical mistakes (most notably, articles like "the" are missing) and a few one-time mistakes (see paragraph break at fourth paragraph, and the incorrect capitalization of the word "Removing"). All in all, great job!