BobBobBob

For many of the schools on your list, you have to retake the GRE. A 154Q is not going to cut it (if you are in theory then maybe you are fine). Depending on your field and research method, you may also want to show some training in stats/econometrics/math, on top of a 160+Q in GRE. People rarely pay much attention to writing samples. Undergrad thesis should not be emphasized as many applicants came with highest departmental honors, award-winning thesis, summa cum laude etc. REALLY work hard on your SOP, that should be your main focus now. Have a clearly stated research interest and concretely ways that you would go about pursuing that interest.

I don't think taking intro to stats gets you competitive in PhD application. You probably want to take more advanced method classes after the introductory class. In that case, as long as you do well in those advanced classes, taking either of the intro classes does not matter that much.

Does anyone know when Harvard's visit is?

Rigor? I would say yes, since you will be taught by the same department and the program requirement looks pretty similar. CIR is more flexible in the sense that it has the option of doing a second year (at least for past years). But I heard it's not guaranteed. You have to demonstrate you are in very good academic standing. You might also want to ask about their placement record.

Looks like you are pretty set on coming to MAPSS. Then a lot of your questions will be answered once you are in the program. Workload is pretty heavy. I took two substantive and one method class every quarter. That's usually two 20-page papers and one final exam/project for finals. If you are in theory then you will probably write three papers every quarter. I think this is generally how heavy it is for Masters/pre-candidacy PhD. I didn't choose graduate housing. There are plenty of housing options in Hyde Park. I would say housing here ranges from $500-$900/person in a 2b2b. I took a lot of classes with the same people and we got to know each other pretty well as the year went along. I think this is generally true for other people as well. The graduate students here are really nice, didn't treat me any differently. I'm not sure what you want to know about workshops. I'm not in theory so I can't say much about theory workshops. I think it's probably more important to know that MAPSS is a fairly large program so it's possible that one can just ride along/not put in as much effort. It's a very good program but you have to bring the best out of you to stand out/be successful in PhD application. For those that stick to the end and apply for PhDs, MAPSS has a 90% placement record for funded offers. I know this year there are CP people who got into schools like Princeton/Berkeley/MIT/UChicago. Maybe those familiar with theory can jump in on this. Good luck!

Is it generally possible to negotiate funding packages with public schools?

I think it wouldn't hurt if you email the department's admin about your application status, especially considering you already have what looks like an admission letter. It's probably overdone but it's just safe not to assume anything until you get a confirmation from the department. Responses here are not from Denver so they don't count.

Advice from Lego G. Student:

High GRE quant score/quant trainings/math trainings/relevant software skills. I feel like we have to somehow score at least one of them.

Dear Mr., It is with delight I inform you, The submitted application is under review. Acceptance it is not, As you may have first thought. In fact, Decision will be due, In a month or two. But we may place you on a waitlist, Just to see if we are the school, You really wanted to go to.

Yes. With some of the incredible schools you have, I think you certainly can decline others.

Seems a little odd that no one on the forum or the results page has claimed Harvard acceptance.

Much kudos to you. Another legend on this forum, second only to @CambridgeHeismanLord

Thank you @encyclopediabrown! This is the most informative piece I've read in a while. It sounds like there isn't one thing that can make all the difference for an applicant. So in the end do applicants simply get a score based on GRE/GPA/SOP etc. and the top x percent get in?

Can you provide a little more details? How much are fundings short of and how are current students dealing with it?

Will definitely take note of @futureadjunct and @1821123's points. But saying that the process is chaotic and random doesn't do any good to future applicants I think? Advice here could very well turn out to be totally irrelevant to the adcomm but at least they give people applying next year a sense of direction to improve their profiles. There are people here who got into almost every program they applied. Maybe there is something that can be said about their applications.

Wait, but we will have to tell faculty members/current students the schools we got into during recruitment events right? At least that's what I'm planning to do. From what I heard faculty expect us to have competing offers and have preferences. no?

Some if not all of them have not sent out rejections. Would this be another great end-of-February-turnaround story?

I have a general question about small departments: With the small number of faculty and students they have, how do they hold classes? Say you have two IR people in the cohort, do they really open a class for just two? Or do a lot of classes get canceled because of low enrollment?

Congratulation!!

I called them last week, the admin staff told me they are wrapping up decisions within two weeks.

Penn state sent out at least 30+ acceptances already.

I think, in the next couple of weeks of so, we will see a huge influx of decisions from schools we haven't heard and rejections from those that already sent out acceptances. In the meantime, for those that are waitlisted and want to fight for a spot, email their DGS about any offers you have received from other schools and express your enthusiasm about their programs. On the one hand, show them that you are a competitive candidate. On the other hand, tell them their program remains your top choice. Maybe also ask your recommenders to write an additional letter of support if possible, though I'm not too familiar with how this works. Maybe others can chip in on this. For those already with their hands full of offers, maybe consider declining some schools that you definitely will not go already. Doesn't make any difference for you but may make a huge difference for someone else. Hang tight folks. We've come this far.

To the post above, it was acceptance. Attached with email from department chair and info on visit.

Chicago's email came from Kathy in the department. Over 400 applications reviewed. Also highest stipend amount I've seen so far. high 20s.