Jump to content

Want_PHD

Members
  • Posts

    25
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

Want_PHD's Achievements

Decaf

Decaf (2/10)

7

Reputation

  1. Well put. Many people haven't been accepted to a single program (myself, though it technically isn't over yet). Being accepted to even one is an accomplishment. Like the post above, I want to add that it's not what the program can do for you, but what you can do for the program. Keep in mind, these are generally paid positions--they are jobs. They want you to make them look good. I think my mistake in this application process was that I mentioned that I want to learn more, rather than selling myself to them. Yet, I have a feeling that in some cases the choice of who is accepted is arbitrary. I know my BA and MA GPA is higher than almost everyone that has been accepted, but it didn't matter. Perhaps a misplaced semicolon in my statement of purpose led them to reject me, or someone on the committee had a cold. Who knows.
  2. I am assuming all of the acceptances have been sent out, yes. Probably there is a majority of graduate applications (across the word; across schools) that don't view/don't post results on this website. Presumably--like many (most?) universities--there are three lists at BU: the accepted; the "waitlisted"; the rejections. Probably they just move everyone up in line if/when some people don't accept. In any case, more than likely you--and myself--are rejected from BU. Unfortunately you may have to wait several more weeks to find out it's official. At best, you--and myself--were not their top choice.
  3. This doesn't help: but no, I haven't heard anything. And my application status has not changed either--then again, I was rejected (via postal service) from BC, but my status there still says "submitted." Yes, one person here has posted that they were admitted. I can't see any way that a committee could admit someone without first reviewing all applications--if they don't review all applications they may be accepting someone that is not as good as someone else in the pool--this is especially important as there are limits to cohort size. With this in mind, I don't want to burst your bubble, but it would seem that you--and myself, a fellow applicant there--were *at least* not top choices, and *at worst* not accepted. This all applies to Brandeis, too, who has already sent out some acceptances. I'm expecting that for both BU and Brandeis--because others were notified of acceptances and I wasn't--I am (at best) waitlisted and (at worst) rejected. Not related at all--has anyone applied to the PhD program at the University of Massachusetts Boston? I hope not because I don't want competition--I was hoping that because the PhD program required a master's (of which I'm done in a couple months), I would have limited competition there.
  4. I didn't even know there was a sociology program at MIT--I would have applied (and yes, probably been rejected). I did *not* apply to Harvard because they don't accept transfer graduate credit--I'm almost done with my master's (in May) but they wouldn't accept it either way (plus, yes, I would likely have been rejected--Brown and Northeastern wouldn' t take me, why would Harvard). Were you going to do your graduate (or master's) again had you been accepted to Harvard?
  5. @Socioeconnut it's not clear, have you been rejected everywhere yet? If not, the party's not over yet.
  6. FYI...there are online sociology masters degrees as well, like Sam Houston State, University of New Mexico--I think University of Alabama has one too. They are masters only, plus you'd have to get a scholarship or secure funding somehow, but you can take a graduate program there while waiting for next year's applications--I don't think you have to enroll full time. (1) you'd have access to all scholarly publications via their libraries (2) you'd have a chance to build better/stronger LORs.
  7. I've read that the majority (more than 50%) of graduate students relocate for school. My current thesis advisor said I'd be a shoe-in for a Bowling Green's program, and he could give me a great LOR. They are in Ohio, and I'm married with three children--and own a house--in the Boston area. It's unfortunate, but the childless have a very prominent competitive advantage because they can apply to the best program that meets their research goals. I also sympathize because--unless you're affiliated with a university--I can't imagine that you'll (1) have access to a library of publications to do research and (2)--if you did have publishable material--you won't be associated with a university, so would unlikely get published because of that. I've never seen any research article from a person not affiliated with either a university or some research institution/think thank place. I mention this because I'm worrying about the same thing. Not to mention how many times can you ask the same people to write LORs?
  8. To end this discussion, I suppose Northeastern staff explained that if you weren't invited to the open house then you weren't being considered--and would be sent rejections letters like I received today.
  9. Also, I decided to call/email places today. FYI UMass Boston's sociology program does not expect to have decisions ready until the first week of March--I hope no one else here applied there; I emailed UMass with my name, too, so I hope that doesn't blacklist me there. Also I got vague answers from Brandeis and Boston college (via phone), mostly because I spoke to the office managers ("ugh...I think they are still deliberating"). Someone else said Boston University will be a couple weeks, but I can't confirm. Again, I hope no one else here applied to these programs.
  10. I'm also cynical of these programs--I mentioned that I'm a parent of three young children and now am almost regretting it--I won't mention it next year if I'm not accepted anywhere. I say this because clearly someone with three children will (1) have less time to spend on work than a childless student and (2) will be more likely to be unavailable due to childcare needs. I know it's not legal for places to *not* accept people because they have children, but it seems too easy for them to reject the person for "some other reason." I sold myself that I have a 4.0 in masters and close to 4.0 in undergraduate--while at the same time caring for children--but I worry that these committees may be weary of taking on someone with three children when they can just as easily take someone who has none.
  11. I feel your pain. I am also a primary caregiver of 3 young children. I've also been accepted no where yet (2 rejections and 4 still pending). I think most people that get accepted are young, and without children. Probably you chose where you applied to with the expectation that you couldn't move, yes? I can't move, so applied to literally every program in my geographic area. Most young people that are unattached can apply to the program that is a perfect fit for them because they can relocate. I think your GRE scores are fine, because I've seen a bunch of people get accepted to schools with much lower. I really think it's about showing off to the committees with your LORs, writing sample, and statement of purpose. Plus, in the end--if you get rejected--you will have no idea why. It could be the phrasing of one sentence in your writing sample--who knows. I can't just be GRE scores that are causing some people to get accepted to many schools at once. My advice to you--because I'm going to do the same if I get accepted no where--is to flat out call or email one of the schools and ask them how you could have done better (i.e., how you could have gotten accepted). You'd have nothing to lose.
  12. Congratz on the acceptance! Pretty good that you got accepted to the only program you applied too...100% acceptance rate!
  13. That's great to hear. This whole process is weird. In this case I expect that your application was brought to the front of the line because it was stellar. I can only imagine early acceptances are cases where every application wasn't reviewed, does that make sense? Then again, I suppose the ~29 days from application due date to acceptance could have allowed the committee time to review all applications--perhaps your case was the one case where it was unanimous--everyone on the committee wanted you. Either way, good job.
  14. I have not heard from Brandeis yet. I've also not heard from: Boston College, Boston University, UMass Boston, and Northeastern. All of them still say "submitted" or "under review," etc. I also saw the two Brandeis acceptances last week--I'm not sure what to make of them. Regarding Boston College, one person on 1/31 said they were accepted but that's abnormally early for them--I'm not sure if some people put up false results. I guess Northeastern "recruitment week" was over this past weekend, but again, I'm not sure what to make of it--maybe they are having another recruitment week again? Who knows. It appears that each university has their own schemes and timelines to release notifications--and just going by what happened in previous years is not the best indicator of when notifications will come out this year. It's frustrating, and I'm getting a bit bored.
  15. Thanks for the leg work. This is good. Yes I think based on previous years it would seem like towards the end of February is when notifications get sent out.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use