
jtro37
Members-
Posts
27 -
Joined
-
Last visited
jtro37's Achievements

Decaf (2/10)
13
Reputation
-
Teaching Faculty Wannabe reacted to a post in a topic: NSF GRFP 2018-2019
-
My reviewers really liked when I talked about my community outreach activities in my personal statement. I think it matters a lot for the broader impacts criteria of the fellowship. Also, think of a research project that has a good broader impact. The first year I applied (senior year), I just said that my contributions would help my field. This time around (first year grad), my broader impacts were contributions to my field but also how it could be applied to under-served communities, and the reviewers really liked that. I think LoRs mean a lot as well, so if you can find professors/PIs who are willing to put the time in to write a really good letter, it would help your application a lot. In my case, I had one PI who was an NSF fellow during her PhD. She also hasn't had a student win the award yet even though she has all her students apply. So the combination of knowing what reviewers wanted and the motivation to have an advisee win made her dedicate a lot of time to the LoR. Another letter writer mentioned that he knows that a lot reviewers like to hear that you want to go into academia, so if that is something you plan on doing definitely mention it. I didn't really do this, but a lot of people say to have experienced grad students or even professors read your proposal. So maybe do that too. They release the names and schools of all the winners. I guess it would be easy to figure out if you download the excel sheet, arrange by school, and isolate the ones that are R2s and see what the difference is. However, I don't think institution matters. They fund the students, not the programs.
-
Man, I had one reviewer who was really critical. After reading their comments I feel even more lucky to have gotten the award now E/E VG/VG G/VG
-
gummybear9 reacted to a post in a topic: NSF GRFP 2018-2019
-
Yeah I'd say you might hear from then if that's the case. I already accepted an offer and don't feel like burning bridges lol. Plus after getting GRFP, TAMU gave me additional funding and I don't think I'd get a better offer from Penn. Also the guy from Penn doesn't do much in the field I wanna go into
-
Mataharii reacted to a post in a topic: NSF GRFP 2018-2019
-
Anybody get their reviews or link to accept the award? I feel like it isn't real until I accept lol
-
WaliaIbex reacted to a post in a topic: Biomedical Engineering/Bioengineering Applicant Profiles for 2019 Admission
-
WaliaIbex reacted to a post in a topic: Biomedical Engineering/Bioengineering Applicant Profiles for 2019 Admission
-
Most PIs should know you're being recruited by other programs so I don't think they'd take it very harshly. I just sent them like quick emails saying thanks for everything but I'm going somewhere else. My explanation was that there was a better fit in terms of research so I think most would understand that. If it's about money then I'd suggest not mentioning that lol
-
Transport reacted to a post in a topic: NSF GRFP 2018-2019
-
No, there's 2,050 awards and 1,540 honorable mentions
-
jtro37 started following NSF GRFP 2018-2019
-
Anyone know how many applicants there were this cycle? It also looks like they offered 2,050 awards. I'm not sure where some people were getting 1,500 available spots from
-
TITX reacted to a post in a topic: Biomedical Engineering/Bioengineering Applicant Profiles for 2019 Admission
-
I put 3.7 but ended up getting a 4.0. I would have been so upset with myself if I hadn't gotten the award. Especially if the reviews brought up a low GPA
-
Awarded! Feels good getting at least one fellowship. Had a string of rejections and GRFP was my last one
-
sgaw10 reacted to a post in a topic: Biomedical Engineering/Bioengineering Applicant Profiles for 2019 Admission