farty14 Posted October 17, 2007 Posted October 17, 2007 Starting a thread. Feel free to post info on schools as well as where you are applying.
flyingwalrus Posted October 31, 2007 Posted October 31, 2007 I've applied to: UC San Diego Berkeley Stanford Texas-Austin Texas A&M Wisconsin-Madison Illinois-Urbana Champaign WUSTL Duke UNC-Chapel Hill Fields: American politics and methods. Concentrations: Behavior, campaigns and elections, parties, and political communication (specifically negative campaigning).
farty14 Posted November 4, 2007 Author Posted November 4, 2007 I guess I should reply to my own post. Applied: Princeton Berkeley Yale Penn WUSTL Michigan Emory Duke Chicago Texas - Austin Field: American Subfield: Public Law
flyingwalrus Posted November 5, 2007 Posted November 5, 2007 Glad to see I'm not the only one to apply to far too many programs.
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 I might just win the "applied to too many schools" contest with 15 lol. Princeton Penn Florida State Penn State WUSTL Emory UMass Delaware UVA UNC Maryland Vanderbilt Miami (OH) Ohio State Notre Dame
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 Oh yeah, I forgot to add this: Fields: American Politics, Public Policy, Quantitative Methods Specific Interest: Non-Governmental Organizations, Lobbyists, and Non-Profits/Faith Based service organizations
farty14 Posted November 13, 2007 Author Posted November 13, 2007 Does Miami of Ohio have a Ph.D. program? If so, really?!
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 13, 2007 Posted November 13, 2007 Does Miami of Ohio have a Ph.D. program? If so, really?! This, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as a safe school, but one after which it is still possible to get a job.
flyingwalrus Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 This, ladies and gentlemen, is what is known as a safe school, but one after which it is still possible to get a job. Indeed. Illinois and Texas are my safeties, although the latter may end up being a pretty good choice if a particular professor ends up there.
farty14 Posted November 14, 2007 Author Posted November 14, 2007 Indeed. Illinois and Texas are my safeties, although the latter may end up being a pretty good choice if a particular professor ends up there. Texas is your safety? I was under the impression that Texas has a very strong and competitive program. Also, I'm still in disbelief that Miami of Ohio has a Ph.D. program.
flyingwalrus Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 Texas is your safety? I was under the impression that Texas has a very strong and competitive program. Also, I'm still in disbelief that Miami of Ohio has a Ph.D. program. Texas is a safety for me. No sure bet, but my recommenders and I are fairly confident that I'll get in. There's no guarantee, of course, but it seems pretty likely. Texas has some pretty good faculty members, but I was somewhat underwhelmed by their placement record. It's not bad, just not as good as I thought before. Their grad coordinator will send it to you if you ask.
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 Texas is your safety? I was under the impression that Texas has a very strong and competitive program. Also, I'm still in disbelief that Miami of Ohio has a Ph.D. program. While the name "Miami" still conjures images of Florida, rather than Ohio, don't underestimate the quality of the university. That's one of the interesting things about the transition that's going on right now in Political Science. Over the last ten years or so, there has been an increasing emphasis on game theory and empirical methods. The schools that are embracing this, publishing and teaching those methods to their grad students, and requiring a math background in their admits are taking a major step up. Meanwhile, traditional powerhouse programs that aren't adapting quickly are having more and more trouble placing their PhD's in academia. If you look at rankings in placement, you'd be surprised how many of the ivy's don't even make the top 20. Until I started researching various programs, I vastly underestimated Florida State. But not only do they have amazing facilities, very friendly faculty, and a winter climate you can't beat lol; they also have an excellent placement record. It would be interesting to see if there's a correlation between quantitative focus of a program and that program's placement record.
farty14 Posted November 14, 2007 Author Posted November 14, 2007 While the name "Miami" still conjures images of Florida, rather than Ohio, don't underestimate the quality of the university. That's one of the interesting things about the transition that's going on right now in Political Science. Over the last ten years or so, there has been an increasing emphasis on game theory and empirical methods. The schools that are embracing this, publishing and teaching those methods to their grad students, and requiring a math background in their admits are taking a major step up. Meanwhile, traditional powerhouse programs that aren't adapting quickly are having more and more trouble placing their PhD's in academia. If you look at rankings in placement, you'd be surprised how many of the ivy's don't even make the top 20. Until I started researching various programs, I vastly underestimated Florida State. But not only do they have amazing facilities, very friendly faculty, and a winter climate you can't beat lol; they also have an excellent placement record. It would be interesting to see if there's a correlation between quantitative focus of a program and that program's placement record. That may be true, but I'm still surprised. I don't think of Miami as a national university by any stretch. What rankings are you looking at, exactly? Most Ivys are in the top 20 or so.
flyingwalrus Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 I can't speak for Miami, but Florida looks to be a pretty decent program. They certainly appear weak in behavior, but their placement record is on par with some of the more prestigious programs.
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 What rankings are you looking at, exactly? Most Ivys are in the top 20 or so. I'm gonna have to take back what I said about the Ivy's and placement. My info was based on rankings presented to me by a professor at a recruiting event, but now that I'm searching online, I can't find them. The rankings that I do find online, however, are curiously inconsistent and significantly contradict what I was given. Econ rankings have some level of variation, but nothing like what I'm seeing in Poli Sci departments.
farty14 Posted November 14, 2007 Author Posted November 14, 2007 I'm gonna have to take back what I said about the Ivy's and placement. My info was based on rankings presented to me by a professor at a recruiting event, but now that I'm searching online, I can't find them. The rankings that I do find online, however, are curiously inconsistent and significantly contradict what I was given. Econ rankings have some level of variation, but nothing like what I'm seeing in Poli Sci departments. Maybe that professor was trying to recruit you?
flyingwalrus Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 Rankings are nebulous. They may give you a ballpark estimate or they may be valueless. All that really matters is whether or not a school has good faculty who match up with your interests and a solid placement record.
flyingwalrus Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 Here's a non-US News ranking. http://www.politicalstudies.org/pdf/psr/hix.pdf
UndraftedFreeAgent Posted November 14, 2007 Posted November 14, 2007 I suppose I should probably mention that I know for a fact that professors monitor forums like this during the admissions process, so be careful just how much and what you say about yourselves and the programs to which you are applying. When I started the grad program I was in last year, one of my professors asked me if I was (insert name I used to use on testmagic a couple of years ago).
farty14 Posted November 20, 2007 Author Posted November 20, 2007 http://tech.groups.yahoo.com/group/polisciapps/ Check out this group. It will enable applicants to graduate programs in political science to organization their application information and discuss the application process in a more coherent way.
neonmeatte Posted December 1, 2007 Posted December 1, 2007 Applied for a Comparative Politics program in the following... Top choices: Berkeley NYU UCLA Second choices: UCSD Rutgers Fall Backs: UF CUNY UW
Canadianpolsci Posted December 28, 2007 Posted December 28, 2007 Hi fellow polsci applicants. Just wanted your feeback and to share: MY INFO: BA University of Toronto (Political Science, emphasis on theory, also studied classical Greek, German) UGPA: 3.87 MA Hebrew University of Jerusalem (focus on medieval and early modern political philosophy; granted by department of religious studies, a Hebrew Univ. department that has a better reputation internationally than political science) GPA: 3.99 GRE: verbal 700 (97%) math 710 (74%) writing 6/6 One published article in a journal in my field. A number of undergraduate and graduate awards. 2 letters from senior political theorists at Toronto. 2 letters from Israeli professors (1 pol. theorist, one professor of religious thought). Applying to study political theory at: Harvard Yale Duke Princeton Georgetown Columbia What are my chances at each school? What kind of reputation does the Unversity of Toronto have among Americans? How hard is Columbia to get into for political theory specifically?
Minnesotan Posted December 28, 2007 Posted December 28, 2007 Hi fellow polsci applicants. Just wanted your feeback and to share: MY INFO: BA University of Toronto (Political Science, emphasis on theory, also studied classical Greek, German) UGPA: 3.87 MA Hebrew University of Jerusalem (focus on medieval and early modern political philosophy; granted by department of religious studies, a Hebrew Univ. department that has a better reputation internationally than political science) GPA: 3.99 GRE: verbal 700 (97%) math 710 (74%) writing 6/6 One published article in a journal in my field. A number of undergraduate and graduate awards. 2 letters from senior political theorists at Toronto. 2 letters from Israeli professors (1 pol. theorist, one professor of religious thought). Applying to study political theory at: Harvard Yale Duke Princeton Georgetown Columbia What are my chances at each school? What kind of reputation does the Unversity of Toronto have among Americans? How hard is Columbia to get into for political theory specifically? Please don't cut/paste spam. Most people who read these forums page through most of the threads, so everyone will see your question if you put it in one general area, like "Applications." Thanks, The Forum Slaves
flyingwalrus Posted December 31, 2007 Posted December 31, 2007 Hi fellow polsci applicants. Just wanted your feeback and to share: MY INFO: BA University of Toronto (Political Science, emphasis on theory, also studied classical Greek, German) UGPA: 3.87 MA Hebrew University of Jerusalem (focus on medieval and early modern political philosophy; granted by department of religious studies, a Hebrew Univ. department that has a better reputation internationally than political science) GPA: 3.99 GRE: verbal 700 (97%) math 710 (74%) writing 6/6 One published article in a journal in my field. A number of undergraduate and graduate awards. 2 letters from senior political theorists at Toronto. 2 letters from Israeli professors (1 pol. theorist, one professor of religious thought). Applying to study political theory at: Harvard Yale Duke Princeton Georgetown Columbia What are my chances at each school? What kind of reputation does the Unversity of Toronto have among Americans? How hard is Columbia to get into for political theory specifically? Assuming there are faculty at those schools whose interests match your own and your statement of purpose and/or writing sample is strong, I imagine you'll be fairly competative. You've got great scores.
peppermint Posted January 15, 2008 Posted January 15, 2008 Hi everyone. I'm going crazy waiting on results- considering that it's only mid-January, this is not a good sign. I applied to 3 Ph.D. programs, but only one in political science- Emory. I've seen on Grad Cafe and Yuster that some people in past years were notified from Emory in mid January! And that many people received rejections in early February. This seems really early. Do you think they'll notify people that early this year? Also, I've seen some people list acceptances from Emory in January, but other people were listing interviews then. Anyone know what their interview policy is? Thanks, and good luck to everyone!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now