eggsalad14

You got into Berkeley, right? I'll be at the visit days next week!

Also idk why I didn't think of this, but probability theory is very helpful too. Like, if you have another year in school and are free to take whatever classes you want, I'd take that as well, but otherwise I wouldn't worry too much about it.

Like formal theory? If you want to make it into Caltech or GSB, calc 3 and real analysis won't hurt. If you're not trying to get into those two specifically (ie aiming or WashU, Rochester, Emory), don't worry about taking more math.

This is going to totally out me to any adcoms, if I haven't already done so (but hopefully very few lurk here) PROFILE: Type of Undergrad Institution: R1, somewhere in the top 30-55 ranked polisci PhD programs. Ranked 50-100 of undergrad schools. Yes, I'm trying to be a little vague. Major(s)/Minor(s): econ, stats, political science Undergrad GPA: a hair under 3.9. It's probably worth noting that my last 2 year GPA was much much better than the first 2 year GPA. Type of Grad: none GRE: 94-98th percentile on all sections. Only took once. Any Special Courses: 3 PhD-level courses (All A's), plus all the mathematical goodies that come from a major in stats (including calc 1-3 and linear algebra) Letters of Recommendation: 3 professors, 2 tenured, 1 assistant. 2 are big enough names in their subsubfields and polisci is small enough that application readers probably know who they are even if they're in different subfields. Research Experience: some RA work, some research intense coursework, one independent project funding by an honors college fellowship, published in only an undergrad journal Teaching Experience: 3 years of TA work, but in math Subfield/Research Interests: American, methods, behavior. Specific interests include inequality, political participation, public opinion, REP, policy, geography, and how these all interact via cool methods. Other: 1 year at an unrelated but quantitative job. Experience with coding. Again, I'm pretty decent at math relative to the typical applicant. Also gonna mention that I'm not an underrepresented minority, nor do I come from an underprivileged household, or anything like that, so no big diversity points for me. For schools that asked for personal/diversity statements, I explicitly said something along the lines of "yeah I'm probably here somewhat because of some privilege. I had a 20hr/week part time job in school, but if you really think about it, only needing to work half time while getting to go to school is really freaking lucky relative to so much of the country" RESULTS: Acceptances($$ or no $$) -- all $$: Stanford, Princeton, Yale, Berkeley (no word on funding for another week actually, but I think they always fund everyone), UCSD, MIT, Columbia, Duke, UNC, NYU, UCLA, Ohio State, WashU, Emory Waitlists: none Rejections: Harvard, Michigan Pending: Going to: I have a vague idea abut I'm waiting for visits to decide for sure. LESSONS LEARNED: This is the part where I say that I applied so many places because I expected maybe 3 acceptances, and I'd apply to all of these schools again. I don't know what exactly I did "right" that other people haven't done. But I'm going to take a stab at it. 1. Coming from a large R1 where students rarely pursue PhDs in political science probably helped in a way. Less competition and professors really notice when you say you want to go into political science. When recommenders send their letters, they often also fill out a survey section asking stuff like "Is this student: a. best I've ever had (or best in years), b. excellent (top 1%), good (10%)" etc. and my situation made it much easier to get an a or b vs. coming from somewhere like Reed or Swarthmore. Letters really matter, especially if the people who read your letters know and trust the people who wrote your letters, which gives R1s a big advantage. 2. I never contacted any prospective advisers. I think it can sometimes help but I know a lot of professors are very lukewarm-to-cold about it. Also I'm awkward, which is really why I didn't do it. Didn't seem to matter in my case anyways. 3. Work on the SOP a lot. People who have read mine include: 3 professors, 2 parents, 1 bf, 1 ex-bf (I feel the need to point out that my SOP writing period did not span two relationships, but rather the latter was an ex when I let him read it). Some will give you good advice, some will give you bad advice, and you'll absolutely get contradictory advice. I leaned on the side of professional as opposed to fun-to-read, which meant no sarcasm, only 1 half-joke, and very little personal background that isn't directly relevant to my skills. It took a long time for me to get mine to a place where I could say "it isn't going to get any better than this" but I did get there! 4. Don't refer to the Harvard Government department as the Political Science department like 3 times in your SOP. This probably isn't really why I got rejected from Harvard, but I'm pretending that it is. 5. Try getting your writing sample published somewhere, even an undergrad journal. Even if it doesn't get published, you'll get a lot of experience in editing and polishing that mofo. I did all of this in the spring and summer, and didn't even have to touch my writing sample come application season (other than to mess with margins to get it to conform with grad school requirements). Major time-saver. 6. A few less-than-perfect grades won't sink you. As a recovering high school valedictorian, having my first two years of undergrad be filled with B+'s and A-'s was a little painful. All my B+'s were in major courses, too. There were definitely nights when I anticipated my semester GPA dipping below 3.5 and it freaked me out so much. I worried that this blemish would sink my graduate school prospects. In hindsight, it's clearly fine. 7. While looking at grad schools, I noticed that so many PhD students at the most prestigious institutions were all graduates of prestigious, expensive undergraduate and master's programs, and often also had prestigious work experience (ie central banks, prominent NGOs, cool politics-related companies and organizations, big-name management consulting). This does not describe me at all. I'm not saying that there isn't an admissions boost for students who don't come from prestigious schools (and I wholeheartedly believe that the BA-to-PhD pipeline is much much better supported at those places), but it's not an obstacle that can't be overcome. In fact, 2 of the exact schools I most had this worry about both accepted me and offered me money beyond their standard stipend package. 8.There's a lot of really good information at GradCafe, especially for those of us who again don't come from common PhD pipeline schools. There's an older thread where people actually posted their statements of purpose. These threads are really good to see the level of competition that is present for many schools. BFB's stickied thread is a must-read. There's also a lot of good information on PSR, but I wouldn't recommend going there unless you're used to reading reddit or 4chan. There's a learning curve before you can recognize what is trolling vs. good information, but that's, unfortunately, the best aggregated place for information on what's going on in the field. I know I just said a lot, but if there's more that anyone would like me to speak on, feel free to DM me or ask here.

If anyone's still wondering where your Harvard rejection letter is, it's in your "promotions" folder if you use Gmail. Pretty shitty promotion tbh.

Hey have any NYU admits who plan on going to their visitation day gotten more info about the schedule/hotel etc.?

LONDON SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS AND POLITICAL SCIENCE (LSEPS) ECONOMICS, Masters (F18) Accepted via E-mail on 28 Feb 2019 28 Feb 2019 report spam APPLICATION WAS COMPLETE ON JAN 8TH, I'M VERY HAPPY TO HAVE GOTTEN AN OFFER FROM MY COUNTRY (IM BRITISH FROM BATH - NOT THE TOOL WE USE TO WASH, BUT RATHER THE CITY IN SOMERSET). I HAVE A DECISION TO MAKE BUT I AM GRATEFUL FOR THE ACCEPTANCE. I WISH THEY GAVE ME SOME FUNDING THOUGH... THE TUITION IN POUNDS IS MORE THAN I WEIGH AND IM A HEFTY BLOKE.

Nice. That's pretty consistent with what I'd expect. I like numbers like that a lot better than some of these "hundreds of qualified candidates from over 40 countries" stuff.

Harvard is a big program, but that's largely because it has a really good yield rate and not necessarily large accept rate (like, no one's going to say no to Harvard except for maybe Stanford or Princeton or the other CHYMPS if those are more geographically convenient or are stronger at what one wants to study). I've read about 24 admitted one year. That being said, there's like 4 accepts and one waitlist on the survey page which seems low but isn't outside the realm of possibility. I've previously seen about 1/3 of acceptances from similar elite schools (so I'd maybe expect to see closer to 8(please ignore this stupid emoji, I can't get rid of it on mobile)) ?with known acceptance numbers get posted on the survey page, but 4 and 8 are such small numbers that I'm not going to really try to make any inferences other than it's very feasible this is all we're going to hear from Harvard. Some years we've seen a lot more, some years we've seen around the same number of acceptances on the result page. What I will say is based on last year's data, I'm surprised we haven't gotten our rejection letters yet. I just checked the portal, also nothing there.

Same ugh, it included like a named fellowship and everything

I'd do some hard thinking about what you want out of your career. If you want to be a professor at an R1, your chances are going to be much higher with a top 15 ish degree, which MAPSS will help you get. If you want to work for an NGO, it's probably not necessary and Maryland would be a great option given it's good faculty and prime location.

Define second-tier.

Be sure to check your spam and other folders. I use Gmail and I think it went into "promotions"

Do something like "-london"

It sounds like I'm getting rejected from Harvard too at this point, which hurts a little but is ok. Literally everyone but Harvard has emailed me today, which has caused a lot of heart racing. I hope everyone is seeing this exchange on the results page about the LSE econ student from Bath. It's a little funny.

My intuition (but maybe this is just me being really optimistic because I want to get in) is that there's more to come out. Harvard has pretty big cohorts and I think the grad cafe community should have more than like 3 acceptances.

The QS rankings are interesting but remember they also factor in strength of policy/public administration/foreign service/international affairs programs, too, which are often pretty separate from the political science program at least in the US. JHU, GW, Georgetown are too high (inflated by their non political science programs and DC location), and you'd be much better served going to a program that doesn't appear in the top 50 like UNC or Ohio State than any of those three if you want a tenure track job.

I really thought they coordinated these, but as far as I know there are at least 3 T10 school visits (of the like 6 or 7 I'm so far aware of) in that same March 31-april 2ish timespan. I'd recommend not reneging on Duke, especially because they've paid for the tickets. I'd ask Columbia politely if they'd be able to accommodate some other time, and explain that while your prefer them, Duke was much quicker in all this and you know it would be a lousy thing to do to bail. Maybe emphasize that you're sure that many others are in this situation. I know I'd love to visit Columbia but have also committed to a different visit in the same timespan, and I'm sure you and I are not the only ones in this boat. I haven't specifically requested an alternate visit day anywhere, but multiple have offered it and have in fact said that an alternate visit day provides a better real look into the grad program (though whether the funding is there for the alternate visit is probably not all universally there).

Call it back!

Wow, big congrats!!! Was it a POI?

Don't worry, the boundary of what "business casual" for women is also really confusing for women and I'm convinced is partly just based on accessories and cardigans and clothing cuts. I'm going with a nice (clean, no rips) pair of skinny jeans, tops that would be acceptable in a conservative business (the kind where if worn with a pantsuit in a pantsuit-requiring-office it'd be okay), booties with a 1 inch fat heel, and a cardigan.

Are you including the summer funding?

Duke's is not generally 37k lol. Maybe after winning an NSF award or some other fellowship or negotiating but the standard package (summer funding not included, because I think that's only guaranteed at that particular rate for one year) is substantially less than 30k. Their funding package is weird to read but the base 9 month stipend is about 24k.

I have no idea what exactly is happening at northwestern, but NYU is more likely reconsidering those that they plan on rejecting from the PhD program for the master's program in political science. Today is the RSVP date for their visit so I highly doubt there are more PhD acceptances coming soon. It just struck me that this may be why at least Columbia and maybe Yale are slower schools - I think they both consider for MAs in the department or related departments if the PhD application isn't successful.

Totally agree, and also Yale. I've applied to so many schools to be safe but of course my 3 undergrad dream schools are the absolute last to notify. I totally did not have dreams about Yale last night.