d1389jjch

Were you include community college instructors? I can find many full-time community college instructor positions available, but I am not sure how competitive they are.

Question: Why assume that non-tenure jobs in academia are bad jobs, or not even a job? Temporary faculty positions at community colleges and universities offer higher salaries than the U.S. average. The majority of jobs in the industry are not tenured as well. Being unemployed, getting fired, and changing jobs are common for anyone. Plus, we are already being paid for doing something we love. I don't understand why it is assumed that getting a job in the industry will necessarily better than a non-tenured job in academia. For me, as an immigrant who is not a native English speaker and without a strong network, I can't imagine a better job than teaching the history and culture of my own country. Even a temporary contract at a community college would be an excellent job in the eyes of many people with similar backgrounds to mine. It's also a good job for the average American, I believe.

On the Harvard and Berkeley History website, it says the overall acceptance rate is five percent, while for international students is one percent. I'm wondering “international students” here refers to citizenship or where they did their undergraduate studies? Do history departments in the US set quotas for how many international students they will admit? (I know Canada does)

In the field of Chinese History, the greatest problem facing young white scholars is the lack of access to archives. In China, the accessibility of archives is extremely unstable. Many archives that are not open to the public can be accessed through personal connections. However, I don't think doing Chinese history as non-Chinese is necessarily a disadvantage. As someone who grew up in China, I need to keep reminding myself that "The past is a foreign country," but many Chinese scholars do not realize this, and it creates problems. I think a non-Chinese perspective is very valuable to the field, but unfortunately, the Chinese archival and field environment is not friendly enough for non-Chinese scholars. In studying US history, I sometimes feel that I understand the intellectual environment of the nineteenth-century US better than many Americans do. This is because China today is in the midst of a similar historical process, including urbanization, rapid economic growth, and the prevalence of social Darwinism.

Thank you! I agree with your point about research questions being the most important part of the SOP rather than career goals. The reason I ask is because some graduate schools' official websites clearly require that career goals should be addressed in the SOP. Although it is usually from graduate schools of arts and science instead of history departments. Anyway, thanks for the advice about the overseas job market, it is very helpful!

Hello everyone! I have a question about talking career choices on SOP. I've read a lot of the discussion and noticed a paradox. On the one hand, the production of phd's has become much larger than the number of faculty positions, and many schools are encouraging their students to explore career diversity. On the other hand, talking about any non-academic career goals on sop might hurt my chances of admission because it is inconsistent with the nature of the phd program. My question is, would a faculty position outside of the US be a reasonable career goal to talk in the SOP? This seems to resolve the paradox. But I'm not sure if US universities would want to commit resources to someone who decides to leave the US after graduation.

I just checked the admission results for English and some people got rejection letters while others received nothing. It seems that the graduate school of Arts and Sciences has been slower than previous years due to work remotely. My guess is that although the History Department has sent the results to the graduate school of Arts and Sciences, the Arts and Sciences is too busy in updating the results for English department and has no time to update for History. If this is the case, we should see the results in the next few days instead of the end of February.

It’s wired Yale did not sent out any rejection letter today. It seems that in past years they always sent rejections(update in portal) in the next day of acceptance.

Guys we really need to stop thinking about the result. It will come sooner or later, and we can't do anything about it. It is ok to be anxious. But it is not ok to refresh the email and result page all the time! Just do the work we currently have and go get some fun at the weekend. If you can't, force yourself to. (speaking to myself)

It seems like they released the result on February 2th last year. So even with the delay, it might still be possible to see the result next week?

@jocelynbymarcjacobs @missamericana @bakeseal @TMP Thanks for everyone's advice! I still could not find the exact time on my application system. So I decided to try to submit everything one day before the deadline, or at least before 5 pm on the deadline. Good luck with everyone's application!

Does anyone know what is the exact time for each deadline? For example, does December 15th mean December 15th 11:59 pm, or December 14th 11:59 pm? I'm sorry for this stupid question.....

As far as I know, most German MA programs do not require SOP and they need your undergraduate degree to match their programs. I would email them to ask if your undergraduate courses in German studies count as a related field. Could you explain more about this? In the US and Canada, there are some funded or low-cost History MA programs that welcome non-History major undergraduate students to apply. Why wouldn't you consider these opportunities?

Has anyone considered the job market outside the United States? A PhD degree from top US schools would be very comepetive in other countires.

I have attend a session held by MAPH and they have provided a application fee waiver code. Feel free to dm me if anyone is intrested. Good luck for everyone's application!