1Q84

But I mean if you had an 88% average and didn't get one, then I don't know what chance I stand with a 75% or whatever 3.3 happens to be! I applied twice to grad school in Canada and was rejected both times. I totally gave up after that... I feel like Canadian schools are much more stringent with the GPA requirements, especially since there's no GRE. Most schools I've seen have had 3.7 minimum requirements... even schools that aren't known for English like Guelph and Brock, which I thought was silly. Also, might get laughed out of the room for this one, but I'm partially applying to grad schools in California to be with my partner. Another 2 years spent apart if I were to do an MA in Canada just wouldn't work (already been apart for 3 years!) PS. I didn't say it in the post before but your research sounds amazingly interesting! I love science stuff even though I'm totally inept when it comes to studying it.

But that's the thing, that kind of stuff can never be backed up by factual evidence. The method is to read each question and use logic to figure out the best possible answer. Simple stuff. The assumption being that women naturally would never do that because they're more "intuitive" and use their "feelings" to solve problems. Silly, right? Oh I know. That's the thing... there are no separate strategies. It's "women, use the Gruber strategy that men already kind of know how to use because it comes natural to them!" It's such strange marketing. For example, Princeton merely says "all people, use the Princeton strategy to increase your score!" Makes sense. Why Gruber felt the need to have a separate section to point out to women their own logical deficiency rather than just point out that both men and women pre-Gruber will fail is beyond me.

Thank you for clearing that up! Wonder why the paper ones are longer...

So true! That serves as a good reminder for me. And exactly the same here: my MA/PhD is going to be my self-fulfillment for sure. I did a Bachelor of Education, and while I enjoyed it, I did not feel fulfilled at all. Inspiring! Also inspiring. Good to know there's lots of late bloomers out there like me! I'm mostly worried about the practicalities of finances and such. If I may ask, did any of your family have trouble establishing themselves after grad school? Or did they hit the ground running? My gosh you make me feel old! Get outta here! Just kidding... that's awesome that you had the drive and tenacity to do that (not to mention the smarts)!

Okay, so I've done a lot of trolling through the forum about SOP writing and have seen the much-lauded "what to avoid" thread. medievalmaniac and intextrovert's walkthroughs have been particularly helpful! Here's my intro paragraph. I know that it may be too fluffy but I wanted to start off with a quote to nudge at my Latin background. Also, I feel like the one big thing holding me back is my undergraduate career and the 5 years between undergrad and grad school. I wanted to make sure they know that I have grown from my undergrad career. Those are my reasons for making such a fluffy intro paragraph. Please let me know if you think it should all be excised and burnt or if I can rework it, make it more concise, etc. The paragraph immediately after it do their best to follow the Fit, Focus, Future model. Specific opinions wanted about the "exploratory period away from academia" phrase. Would that come off as offensive to academics? Thanks in advance

Good point. That's interesting! I've never seen any departments list Latin as a requirement for Renaissance Lit-- Medieval, yes. I have a working knowledge of written French (Canadian, though). Hmm! I'll definitely contact the DGS. I have a feeling I'm being laughed out of the house by the rest of the professors... I erroneously referred to it as an English department. I think that may have contributed to the (deserved) snarkiness.

I've heard that claim too... but I mean how much of that is societal conditioning and learned helplessness, due to ridiculous, published material like this?! I read a bit more of it and he used the age-old "women are more intuitive" reasoning. Since the GRE is more manly and logical, women need to learn man's way, apparently. Well you'd have to buy the book for that! I can't really set down all the strategies in a 700pg book here. But they're the same as any other book, really. Almost identical to Princeton (except Princeton says it better).

I got some very snarky emails back from POIs recently stating that I need to have proficiency in a second language for their Literature program. I was confused as I stated in the original emails that I had a double major in English Lit and Latin language composition and translation. Does Latin not count as a second language now?

So for those of you who started a bit later, then you're juggling a part-time masters with full-time work? What are all your arrangements like, if you don't mind me asking. I mean... 8 years without a real income is scary, right?!

Sorry, I meant 23 and below.

Oh wow what a bummer Good to know all these things. I would totally apply straight for a Ph.D but I don't quite have the grades for it. I think the lowest tier direct PhD school in California is UC: Santa Cruz and I don't have the grades for it And no worries, I didn't take you listing your stats as bragging. It's good to know what level I'm at in comparison with others. It doesn't sound very likely that I'll get a Fulbright then. I only have a 3.3 GPA and such. Thank you though! ETA: Since I kinda messed stuff up in my 3rd and 4th years of undergrad, I was hoping to really boost my status in my MA, get an amazing GPA, make some good connections and relationships with profs and then get into the school of my dreams for a PhD. It seemed like a good plan at the time...

I know this may be a sensitive subject for some, but I'm curious. I took 5 years between my undergraduate because I was disillusioned with the system and suffered a lot in my last 2 years of school due to personal issues resulting in some low grades. As a result, I feel REALLY behind in my timeline. I'm going be 27 if I start my Masters next Fall and I feel like all my friends have either started or finished their grad school or are in their full-fledged careers. My partner is a consideration too. Making him wait for 8 years or so with no real income while I finish my school stuff feels pretty crappy. By the time I start working (if I'm extremely lucky and can find a job coming out of grad school), I'd be 35 or so. Only starting to have a real income and start saving for a house, etc. that late in life is really, really stressing me out. Anyone else in this same boat? Or anyone been through this same thing and came out unscathed? Sigh. Age is just a number right?

I couldn't find a definitive answer on the website (and they haven't responded to my email) but the SSHRC is only for use in Canada right?

You are AMAZING! So much helpful information Thanks so much. Very good to know about the J-1 details. I guess I can worry about returning to Canada (or leaving the US) in 8-10 years... hehe. May I ask what research you were proposing for your Fulbright? And why you think you may not have gotten it? I have this sinking feeling that they don't take kindly to humanities projects (despite what they say on the website). All the past year's Fulbright recipients were science-related research students. Sigh.

Don't take my word for it, however. Maybe it's more common than I think. But it sounds like you're doing a heck of a lot of work for only partial funding. Lots of stuff by Haruki Murakami (Kafka On The Shore is an excellent place to start)! Also, Life of Pi by Yann Martel is pretty good.

I don't have any firsthand experience but that seems egregiously low from what I've read and heard from others.

Yeah I guess it makes sense as a cultural exchange. Buh. It's unfortunate because the Fulbright is pretty much the only fellowship/scholarship large enough to cover nonresident tuition in the US. The other Canadian awards (the OAS) has the same stipulation about returning to Canada for 2 years.

This is giving me second thoughts about applying to this. Seems kind of like contractual prostitution to some degree! Not to totally dump on the organisation and the system, but being forced to go back to my home country for 2 years seems... wrong.

Holy moly. That's intense. Thanks for the heads up! If only it were as simple as marrying for me.... they unfortunately don't recognise same-sex marriages in California (much less for immigration purposes). Sigh.

Subtopic! Hurrah! Is anyone from Canada applying for a Fulbright Traditional Award here? Just a couple things I was wondering about it... maybe we can all pool our knowledge: - I saw the requirement of returning to Canada for 2 full years after the study period. What if I'm hoping to get the award for my MA and then want to go on and do my PhD right after? Would I still have to return to Canada? - You have to submit letters of acceptance for the Fulbright application? How is this possible? If I'm applying for Fall 2013, how could I have acceptance letters for the Nov 15 deadline for next year's Fulbright? - Is the GRE necessary? I saw that they take them "as necessary". Not sure what that means. So many confusing bits...

Excellent idea! Thanks for the info and suggestion

It seems like EVERYONE is doing an ETA. I wasn't expecting that. I'm a Canadian student hoping to get a Fulbright Traditional Award to fund an English MA in California. Is this... uncommon? Also: I couldn't find anything explaining the legend in those spreadsheets. What's "recommended" and "promoted" etc. mean? I couldn't find anything about that on the Fulbright website either. I'm assuming alternate means you didn't get your first choice but got your second instead?

They say "approximately" 20 questions in the Princeton book and give 20 on the online test. They also give 20 on the free online test for Manhattan Prep. However, they give 25 in the Gruber practice tests and 25 in the official ETS practice tests. Anyone?

I don't know how orthodox it is to request people to take a look at my writing sample, but I thought I might give it a shot! I was going to post it here but, being paranoid and since it's somewhat nearing application time, I thought I should hold back. Anyone want to read my introduction (just 1 page) of an undergraduate essay I've been re-tooling on Milton and God's Tyranny? I know the subject has been talked to death and analysed quite fully... this was an assigned essay with a specific topic designed to test our close-reading abilities. You can be as vicious as possible! I need good, honest opinions about my writing. Thanks in advance

I'm guessing the percentiles throughout the years are not shown, merely the latest rankings?