Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Jen and Masha -

Congratulations! Would you mind sharing your credentials with us, and perhaps who your POIs were?

3.4 GPA in my last two years of study at a top university. 3.7 overall GPA. GRE V 159 Q 162

Five years professional experience as a researcher in the labor movement.

Research interests: Social Movements, Demography, Political Sociology, and Russia and Eastern Europe.

My POIs were Professors Pfaff, Tolnay, and Rosenfeld. I had pretty good contact with them throughout the process, and met with two beforehand. I mentioned all three in my SoP.

Allegedly great LORs, one from a high-profile scholar in my subfield, and an SoP that I never want to look at again after the 20+ revisions! :)

I'm a 2nd-round applicant - I applied and was wait-listed in 2009. I now live in Seattle, which made contact with POIs much easier this time around, obviously.

jenjenjen - Are you planning on going to the Recruitment Weekend?

Posted (edited)

Princeton one also just showed up on results survey! Congrats and please share some details :)

Another Princeton accept on results - how am I supposed to get any work done while compulsively refreshing email and gradcafe?

Edited by chibuku
Posted

Waitlisted for Wisconsin as well.... Arrrrghhhh I just want this to be over with. I need ice cream.

Posted

Another Princeton accept on results - how am I supposed to get any work done while compulsively refreshing email and gradcafe?

Ditto.. this is all I do.. It's awful... Now it's 4pm which means it's time to run outside to the mail box. Can't leave the phone behind in case someone important calls. This is crazy. I just need to hear from ONE program to calm me a bit.

Posted

Ditto.. this is all I do.. It's awful... Now it's 4pm which means it's time to run outside to the mail box. Can't leave the phone behind in case someone important calls. This is crazy. I just need to hear from ONE program to calm me a bit.

Mailbox- great idea. Have you checked your `spam`folder recently ;)

Posted

Ditto.. this is all I do.. It's awful... Now it's 4pm which means it's time to run outside to the mail box. Can't leave the phone behind in case someone important calls. This is crazy. I just need to hear from ONE program to calm me a bit.

Mailbox- great idea. Have you checked your `spam`folder recently ;)

You should also make a second e-mail account and send some test e-mails to your primary account.

Ya know, just in case....

Posted

I check my spam 3 times a day too.. I've been getting lots of other e-mails. It's just not my time yet. Patience.... deep breaths...

Posted

I check my spam 3 times a day too.. I've been getting lots of other e-mails. It's just not my time yet. Patience.... deep breaths...

This video might help you calm down a little bit! It's a really good cover of California Girls by Bruno Mars. :)

Posted

Anyone know what it might mean for those of us who haven't heard anything? I know some people have been accepted Stanford/Princeton/Michigan/Duke - all of which I applied to (all of to which I applied?), but responses have not been forthcoming. I'm tempted to write these off as rejections, but don't know if a lack of reply is more likely to mean I've been placed on some sort of unofficial waitlist. And I'm sure I'm not the only person wondering this... Any feedback from other years or people with "ins" at dept would be appreciated!

Posted

I was hoping for SOMETHING from Seattle today.

Not getting any word on Michigan isn't that surprising.

This is the week though, I can feel it. Seattle shoudl be done this week, so will Michigan, and Boulder will do invites on the 15th... good luck to all, lol.

Posted

Anyone know what it might mean for those of us who haven't heard anything? I know some people have been accepted Stanford/Princeton/Michigan/Duke - all of which I applied to (all of to which I applied?), but responses have not been forthcoming. I'm tempted to write these off as rejections, but don't know if a lack of reply is more likely to mean I've been placed on some sort of unofficial waitlist. And I'm sure I'm not the only person wondering this... Any feedback from other years or people with "ins" at dept would be appreciated!

I was under the impression that this all happens in waves. Like they'll invite the first group and that group will either accept or decline (for various reasons) then based on the number of candidates who declined the offer, the department reaches out to a 2nd wave of applicants until all their spots are filled so we may not hear anything until March if we aren't first wave.

Posted

I was under the impression that this all happens in waves. Like they'll invite the first group and that group will either accept or decline (for various reasons) then based on the number of candidates who declined the offer, the department reaches out to a 2nd wave of applicants until all their spots are filled so we may not hear anything until March if we aren't first wave.

I am under the same impression. I was accepted in an early wave from one program, rejected along with a pile of others from another, and haven't heard a peer from a program that I know some people have been accepted to. I also heard from a soc. professor at my UG school that programs accept people in tiers, inviting top candidates first and having a de facto wait list. On top of that, I think it makes sense intuitively that departments would have certain slots to fill, so to speak. That is, a department knows it wants a cohort of 10 students, and maybe of that desired cohort, 7 will be quant. methods, 3 will be qual., 2 will work on gender, 2 on race, 1 on theory, so on and so forth. So rather than just taking the 10 applicants with the highest GRE scores and GPAs and best SoPs overall, they say "OK, here is our top choice to fit the profile we're looking for in a sociologist of gender, invite this person." Then maybe they identify a few top candidates for, say, economic soc. and there needs to be deliberation before offers are mailed.

I have no idea, but it makes sense that departments would be less organized than we want them to be. Just think of the professors you know...

Posted

I am under the same impression. I was accepted in an early wave from one program, rejected along with a pile of others from another, and haven't heard a peer from a program that I know some people have been accepted to. I also heard from a soc. professor at my UG school that programs accept people in tiers, inviting top candidates first and having a de facto wait list. On top of that, I think it makes sense intuitively that departments would have certain slots to fill, so to speak. That is, a department knows it wants a cohort of 10 students, and maybe of that desired cohort, 7 will be quant. methods, 3 will be qual., 2 will work on gender, 2 on race, 1 on theory, so on and so forth. So rather than just taking the 10 applicants with the highest GRE scores and GPAs and best SoPs overall, they say "OK, here is our top choice to fit the profile we're looking for in a sociologist of gender, invite this person." Then maybe they identify a few top candidates for, say, economic soc. and there needs to be deliberation before offers are mailed.

I have no idea, but it makes sense that departments would be less organized than we want them to be. Just think of the professors you know...

Makes sense to me... Just makes us crazy in the meantime lol

Posted

Makes sense to me... Just makes us crazy in the meantime lol

Perhaps this process is a hazing act to let us in the secret order or something

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use