mmch Posted March 18, 2013 Posted March 18, 2013 I am deciding between two good art history PhD programs and could use some outside input: School A is in the same town as my family (I'm close with my sisters, nieces, parents), its a medium-sized city with a low cost of living, and I was offered a modest 5-year TA, no summer funding. I have to take fewer classes and TA each quarter as part of my deal, so maybe it will take me a bit longer to complete coursework. School B is across the country in a small city, high cost of living, and I was offered a nice 2-year fellowship & 3-year TA, plus 2 summers of funding. I have to live in a grad dorm/apartment at least the first year to afford the transition. Also I have more opportunities for curatorial work there. I have strong faculty connections at each school and am thrilled with my acceptances but I am having a hard time deciding. Thanks.
pears Posted March 18, 2013 Posted March 18, 2013 school B, if you have a stipend and/or can afford living there. spread your wings and fly! Mecasickle 1
ZacharyObama Posted March 18, 2013 Posted March 18, 2013 I'd say B - more opportunities for curatorial work. Doing with a slightly lower standard of living might not be so fun for awhile, but it sounds like you would get through faster and with more applied experience.
iowaguy Posted March 18, 2013 Posted March 18, 2013 School B with more opportunities for career advancement!
juilletmercredi Posted March 18, 2013 Posted March 18, 2013 School B. Do not underestimate the time suck that TAing can be, or how important summer funding is. You can get SO much work done over the summers. You can always fly home and visit, or your family can visit you, and if you are in art history and want an academic job you need to get used to having little control over where you live.
lypiphera Posted March 19, 2013 Posted March 19, 2013 School B does sound like a better deal, but I would not consider more TAing to be all that terrible. Yes, it is a time suck and may lengthen your stay, but it may also give you a more impressive resume and teaching experience. If all else was equal, I would take the less TAing, but if you are really close with your family and would like to stay, I wouldn't be stopped just because of an extra 2 years of TAing. It all depends on your own priorities and values - I wanted to live far away, so family wasn't an issue, but if it's really important to you, you should factor it in. abeilles 1
compiler_guy Posted March 24, 2013 Posted March 24, 2013 School B. Better funding and better career opportunities!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now