Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

like you need extra help remembering that you haven't heard from them! i'm tempted to reach out to find out if it'll be via mail or email, but also, maybe i can just sit on it for a few more days. 

Posted

For digital posterity: I also received approval on April 30.

Also for digital posterity: I applied for the Post-PhD Research Grant. It looks like all the forms, procedures, and timelines are identical for both the Post-PhD and the Dissertation Research Grants.

Finally for posterity, as it seems other applicants may have similar experiences: Reviews were visible long before news of approval appeared, and they were not universally positive. I was surprised by some negative comments made by reviewers, which a.) asked for information that I felt I had clearly given in the application; or b.) seemed to contradict the stated goals of the W-G Research Grants. This leads me to guess that W-G doesn't simply accept the reviews at face value, but actually reviews the reviews.

Good luck to future applicants, and especially good luck to all applicants who will put in the labor of resubmitting.

  • 4 months later...
Posted

Hey everyone, 

sorry if i missed this but I was wondering about the length of responses you submitted for each question. I didn’t find a suggested length for the questions - should these be around a page or two? Or shorter? 

Any help works - thanks! 

Posted

Happy Monday! Has anyone that submitted for the May 1 deadline heard anything since mid-August? ?

  • 4 months later...
Posted

For anyone searching for this kind of information (this year or in future years), I just heard I was put through to the second round today.

  • 4 weeks later...
Posted

Hello,

I was wondering if anyone who had previously applied might be willing to look over my proposal or to share unsuccessful (or successful would be even better!) proposals with comments?  I am in cultural anthropology by the way.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Second-rounder for 2019-2020 cycle -  received an email that they are going to 1) delay Round-2 decisions until August 2020, 2) fund an even smaller number of projects, likely those with non face-to-face methods. But they are also going to ask reviewers to "evaluate your proposals in light of the times in which you wrote them." This is strikes me as contradictory. If they're evaluating them that way, why are they delaying it till 08/20?  Couldn't they just have evaluated them, decided on funding, and delayed conferring the funding until it's safe to do participant observation? frustrated. 

  • 4 months later...
Posted

If anyone is checking this like me, please post when you have some info about this round of decisions.

Posted

Sorry to post without additional information, but this is becoming absolutely brutal! So ready for some kind of news soon.

  • 5 months later...
Posted
6 hours ago, lemepris said:

No email yet but on the portal it now shows the 'Last Edited' date as Feb 10th

You mean when you click "preview" button you see "last edited" date? Mine is February 9th:)

Posted
51 minutes ago, zzzkkk said:

You mean when you click "preview" button you see "last edited" date? Mine is February 9th:)

Yes! Hoping we hear something before the weekend.

Posted
Just now, lemepris said:

Yes! Hoping we hear something before the weekend.

Yeah, hopefully!:)

 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use