Jump to content

shoupista

Members
  • Content Count

    15
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About shoupista

  • Rank
    Decaf

Profile Information

  • Location
    FL, US
  • Application Season
    2017 Fall

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. I'm in a discipline where you apply largely to the program and not to specific professors, so I don't have much personal experience. However, you might find this useful: https://theprofessorisin.com/2011/07/25/how-to-write-an-email-to-a-potential-ph-d-advisor/
  2. In theory, I don't see why this would be a problem (assuming the pre-reqs available to you at the present moment fulfill the specific graduate program requirements, which is something you need to discuss with your future graduate program). If you're on the quarter system with a set of late-summer classes, it's probably still feasible even this far into summer. It may not be possible with a semester system, however.
  3. Having just gone through what turned out to be a pretty successful application cycle, I had ample opportunity to think about this. Ultimately, a program admitting you without funding to a PhD program is sending a signal that, for whatever reason, they're not invested in you as much as they are the people they fund. That right there would be sufficient to remove such a program from my consideration. I believe that one should be honest with oneself when evaluating career paths, and frankly being unable to attract funding at a given program should give one pause about whether that school is the r
  4. I was going through old threads here and wandered across one discussing essayscam.org. After perusing the forum for a while, I'm flabbergasted at the complete lack of ethics on the part of almost every member. As a hopeful future academic, I'm disgusted and enraged. The whole site is an interesting illustration of many of the more negative aspects of human behavior. Additionally, it's frankly incredible that that many people involved in an industry designed to facilitate cheating have the gall to complain about "unethical" services/clients. Has anyone had any personal experience with peop
  5. Research experience and potential to conduct further research is the key thing planning PhD schools are interested in. Describe your activism experience only inasmuch as it informs your research experience, interests, and plans. Describing activism/protesting you've participated in that isn't relevant to your research interests is wasted space in your admissions materials. The central question you should ask yourself when completing your application- does including this information provide adcoms additional evidence of my potential as a researcher? I just came off a successful applicatio
  6. I've received two similar emails in the past month. Both resulted in funded admissions offers. Be prepared to talk about your research interests and your interest in their program. It also wouldn't be amiss to have a list of your questions about the program handy.
  7. In addition to thanking my recommenders in person, I bought each of them a small thank you gift and gave them a handwritten thank you note. I have fairly strong relationships with all three of them, so it seemed weird not to get an actual gift. I've told them all the decisions I'm getting, pretty much as I know. My situation is a little unique- suffice it to say that I see two of my recommenders weekly, if not daily, and they're actively involved in helping me make my final decision. My third recommender is a little different, but I'm a pretty open book so I fill her in when I see her.
  8. The biggest advantage I had was the guidance and support of academics in my intended field. In addition to writing what were apparently very strong letters of rec (I was told by two professors in one program that they expected me to "walk on water" based on the strengths of my letters), professors in my old master's program provided me with as much assistance as I needed during all stages of the application process. It helps a lot to demystify the application process when you can ask someone who actually sits on an admissions committee in your intended field about your application questions. M
  9. This is perhaps a bit too late for the OP, but I'll respond in the hopes of helping a future reader. For what it's worth, I had multiple people advise me that not having any "real world" experience outside of academia may hurt my chances in the admissions process for doctoral programs. I've received funded acceptances at 4/5 of the programs I applied to, though, so who knows- maybe the lack of real world experience is why I didn't get that last admission. Maybe it had nothing to do with it. On the other hand, most of the doctoral students I personally know took some time off school b
  10. I'm in a social science field, so my experience may not reflect the realities of your field. My undergrad GPA was ok (3.2 overall, ~3.8ish upperclassman). My Master's GPA is a 4.0. I'm currently applying to PhD programs, and aside from one question about why my grades improved, schools have seemed way more interested in my graduate GPA. I suspect that schools that consider undergrad GPA want to see GPA maintenance and/or improvement as much as a high GPA per se. YMMV.
  11. I'm also in a social sciences field. For what it's worth, when I interviewed at a West-Coast institution, I defaulted to referring to my interviewer as "Dr" and was politely informed that it was departmental convention to use first names. I've had several experiences with professors at my current institution where they actually prefer to be called by their first name but never explicitly mention it. They'll sign off their emails with their first name and even refer to themselves as their first name, but won't correct anybody for calling them Dr or Prof. I've also had professors tha
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.