Between SheldonCopper's report, the unprecedented and isolated interview result posted, and now this single admissions result, I have no idea what to believe about the admissions timeline for UW stats this year, although I am inclined to give SheldonCopper's report more weight...
Doesn't UW biostats usually come out before UW stats?
Somebody posted an interview for University of Washington stats Ph.D. I thought they don't do interviews?
In the unlikely event that the person who posted it sees this, would you be comfortable providing any additional information about this?
Still nothing for me. I can't find much information about how this process goes, but it seems like it's possible that the interview invitations are released over the course of two or three days, so if I don't hear back by the end of the week, I'm probably out.
Sorry, I forgot to reply to this. I'm applying to 8 or 9 schools in the top 20 (vaguely defined, as Ph.D. rankings tend to be). My poor application strategy of not applying to schools that are perhaps more realistic for my profile makes the waiting process pretty nerve-wracking for me. Thanks for the signature template--I'll update my signature with details as results come in.
I think a few programs, like Yale and Duke, do. I don't have a comprehensive list of which programs interview, but I'm willing to bet that someone in this forum would know if a particular school you applied to interviews.
I thought so too, but then I looked at last year's thread. At this time last year, there were only five or so posts. Maybe we're feeling this way because we are just now entering the period of the cycle when decisions/interview invites start going out in earnest.
Has anyone heard from Duke stats yet?
It might be worth noting that this thread is in the Mathematics and Statistics sub-forum and that @cyberwulf is a biostatistics professor speaking about their own method of evaluation. Based on your profile, it seems like you are applying to anthropology or archaeology programs. I wouldn't be surprised if they tend to review applications differently.