Jump to content

Quicksilver25

Members
  • Posts

    21
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Quicksilver25

  1. 6 minutes ago, qeta said:

    I find this talk of conferences fascinating! I’m in sociology in the US and have presented at 10+ international and national conferences and workshops, including a very prestigious dissertation workshop. I think of conference presentations as a way to demonstrate that I’m involved in the disciplinary community and/or that I’m working on a manuscript. Most professors and grad students in my program present at conferences, almost as an annual ritual. Can somebody tell me why conference participation signals merit? Is it a discipline-specific thing? (I partly want to know because I truly hate huge conferences—they generally involve vague feedback and are costly to participate in—and much prefer workshops.)

    I'm one of those students who participates in conferences annually. I've been lucky because my registration fees have always been covered. I like to make use of my institutional conferences because registration is free.

    For me, I think the importance of going to conferences lies in showing some sort of commitment to sharing your research. Publications are great because they'll potentially reach a larger audience, and you can get your name out there, but when you present at a conference, you have to talk about your research, answer peoples' questions, and discuss your work. And, depending on the conference, that might mean sharing your work with lay people. Those are the benefits that I see. Also, in my department, conferences look good on our yearly evaluations. Attending them is not a requirement. It just looks good.

    That said, I appreciate you saying that you hate huge conferences. I hate them too, and I don't think that many people would be willing to admit this non-anonymously. Yes, I attend conferences to share my research, but to be completely honest, I mostly do it to add to my CV and strengthen my scholarship applications. I genuinely don't have the attention span for the sheer number of presentations that take place at some of these conferences, particularly when they're multi-day affairs. I find them exhausting at times, which means I'll struggle to fully engage. And I agree with you about conferences often involving vague feedback and being costly as downsides. Now that I've gotten into my PhD program, I don't think attending conferences will be a priority for me. I'll probably commit to attending one per year, and try focusing on publications instead

    I've never done a workshop. What are those like?

  2. 4 hours ago, Sora.K said:

    Hey @qeta @Quicksilver25@Ana Lacerda!

    Thanks for sharing everyone! Really insightful.

    @Quicksilver25, that is a lot of presentations. What kind of conferences are they? Are they international, provincial, and/or institutional level conferences?  @qetaI think the adjudicators' rationale makes sense. I guess the strategy for those who are working on different topics/related topics which do not build on the MA topics might be to frame it as a strength, as @Quicksilver25said. 

    They were a mix of provincial and institutional conferences.

  3. 5 hours ago, Ana Lacerda said:

    Plus, would you guys say the most important thing is publications? Those of you who got it, could you tell us how many publications you had? 

    I'm a first-time applicant at the PhD level (I'm currently in the final year of my Master's). I didn't get the CGS-M for my first year, I got waitlisted the second year I applied, and now successfully got the PGS-D. Getting waitlisted was a confidence boost, so I used that same proposal and used the extra page we get to write to really flesh out my ideas.

    From what I've seen with other people who've applied to SSHRC, publications aren't the be-all and end-all. I've seen people with 3+ publications get rejected, and people with only one get awarded. I'm one of the people who had only one publication and I was just the third author, so the strength of my application didn't come from publications. Instead, I had 12 conference posters (four of them first author) and a lot of research experience (I worked as an RA for a few years before starting my master's and I've done some RA work during my master's). In my applicant statement, I noted that I was working on other manuscripts that would be submitted for publication. One of those studies is registered on Open Science Framework (OSF). So, even though that manuscript hadn't been submitted yet, I cited the project and provided the link to the OSF registration instead of a DOI in my research contributions section. I did this to prove that I was indeed writing a manuscript and not just saying I was.

    In terms of my research proposal, although my PhD proposal fits under the umbrella of my research area, it isn't directly related to my master's research or any of the publications/posters I've done. My proposal could honestly be read as though I'm trying to change my research focus entirely. I was concerned about this not looking good in my application, so I made sure to describe how the work I've done during my master's has prepared me to do my newly proposed research, and how conducting this research will allow me to broaden the scope of my training and expertise and start focusing on certain areas of interest as I become a more independent/senior researcher. My hope was that there would be some understanding that at the master's level, students can kind of get forced into certain research topics, but at the PhD level, students get to have more say in their research, so there's room to branch out (I didn't mention any of this, though).

    TL;DR: I have only one publication where I'm third author and my proposed research is somewhat unrelated to the work I've done over the last few years. What I think helped my application was having a ton a research experience, a bunch of poster presentations, and making sure to explain how my research experience and extra-curricular activities relate to the research I proposed and how those experiences have prepared me to conduct that research.

     

  4. 5 hours ago, Burner_Question said:

    Interesting. I still haven't heard back from them; I sent a second email today. Where did you find the request for installment form? I can't seem to find that anywhere. So, it looks like we will receive the doctoral fellowship? Also what email did you send your questions to? 

    I'm not the OP you quoted, but here's a link to the request for first installment form. It's due up to six weeks in advance of the installment date: https://www.nserc-crsng.gc.ca/_doc/Students-Etudiants/FirstInstalment_e.pdf

    When you have questions for SSHRC, send them to fellowships@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca

  5. Just got the heart attack email. Good luck to everyone who applied!

     

    Dear applicant,

     

    Information regarding your doctoral application will be uploaded next week to the SSHRC Extranet for applicants.

                           

    You will receive a separate system generated notification with steps on how to activate your extranet account in order to access the information.

    If you encounter technical issues in accessing the SSHRC Extranet for Applicants, please contact the Helpdesk at webgrants@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca.

    For any other questions, do not hesitate to contact us at fellowships@sshrc-crsh.gc.ca.  

    Sincerely,


    The Research Training Portfolio

    Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council

     

  6. 8 hours ago, Tas02 said:

    Hi,

    Ibthink CIHR CGSD result has been published already. Any update of SSHRC? How to know the result btw?

    No updates for SSHRC. Results will be sent out to applicants by email, and based on past years, it looks like results won't be out until late April or early May, so there's at least another week or two until we all find out.

  7. 12 minutes ago, Psych1313 said:

    And just a heads up, for Calgary's clinical program, the program coordinator sends invites en masse to everyone on one specific day with the POI cc'd. Historically it has been on the first/second week of Jan.

    Hope that helps!

    This is true of the experimental program as well (if there's anyone here who applied to experimental).

    Invitations were sent out on January 10th last year, but like most other schools, UCalgary got a TON of applications this year. Don't be surprised if invitations are sent out on the later side.

  8. Is anyone who's admitted to UCalgary for fall 2020 having trouble registering for classes? I keep getting a error saying I need the department's consent to enroll in the classes I've chosen. I've already sent an e-mail to the department asking about this. I'm just wondering if anyone else is experiencing this.

  9. On 2/6/2020 at 12:52 PM, Pancake019 said:

    Hi! I was wondering if your invitation was sent to your personal email, or if applicants have ucalgary emails that admission decisions are sent to? Thanks :)

    The open house was today. Invitations were sent out to whatever e-mail applicants listed on their application about three weeks ago. My understanding is that offers of admission will start going out within the next 2 weeks (I'm not 100% sure about that timeline). It may be worth contacting the program to see if they'll be waitlisting applicants and/or doing a second round of offers later on. 

  10. 2 hours ago, ClinPsyc20 said:

    hey yea received Wednesday in a mass email.. you should email the program admin

     

    2 hours ago, Cascadia said:

    I did as well. I agree with @ClinPsyc20 in following up. 

    Just sent an e-mail. They've been really bad about responding to my e-mails since I started the application process.

    I know the first day is supposed to be tours of campus and labs, and presentations by researchers/students in the department. What's scheduled for the second day?

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use