Jump to content

Nothalfgood

Members
  • Posts

    29
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Nothalfgood

  1. UMich biostat is well regarded for genetics. If one is interested in this application in particular, then this is arguably the best department in the country to be. If one is interested in anything else of the biostatistics flavor, UMich is good but arguably not the best. UMich stat is a large and fairly well-balanced department, balanced in the sense that there are plenty of people doing work in theory and in applications there. This would be a great place to be if one wanted to work in stats generally, and I think there are some people in the engineering school who do ML research with whom some stats people collaborate. However, I don't think UMich stat is known for ML or anything else like how UMich biostat is known for genetics. If I personally had the choice between these programs, then I would choose the stat department because I am interested in applications outside of the health sciences, but I would not regret ending up in the biostat department which boasts a similarly intense program and probably slightly improved outcomes for graduates considering their broadly applicable expertise.
  2. Some people get into top programs without a math degree or the recommended minimum math coursework, but this is usually because of the research that they already do, demonstrating an interest and facility with stat methods. In my opinion, you should focus on learning what is useful, not what is required, and as it turns out all math is useful if by learning it you become a more mature proof writer and more comfortable with reading proofs that involve analysis, linear algebra, and probability all together.
  3. I had a similar background by my senior year as you, @dirichletprior. You have already met expectations and exceeded them. Also, those who consider your application won't necessarily see your grades or course titles this coming year. You could go the route that I chose and just take a few challenging math classes in whatever sounds fun and then a few other classes that you won't be able to take in grad school. I did partial differential equations, algebraic geometry, and algebraic topology, for example, plus electives in philosophy and history to explore other interests and improve my writing skills. If instead you prefer staying more focused, then I would throw in mathematical finance as another topic that you might like to consider. An advanced course in this topic may exercise all of your statistics-relevant skills!
  4. I'm sure there are plenty of examples of people getting into some top math programs without having a math degree, and statistics is certainly one of the most natural alternatives if you've already pretty much mastered real analysis and linear algebra, so my opinion is that it's worth a try to apply. I think there are some applied math programs that blur a lot of the lines between pure math and statistics like at UMaryland and Johns Hopkins which you may be interested in too. In some sense, you may be unable to totally "escape" applications at this point, but I think you could find stats or applied math programs where you could spend virtually all of your time working without any real data and instead on almost exclusively analysis and topology flavored problems. That is my impression from some current graduate students in statistics at schools like UMichigan and UWisconsin.
  5. I personally would choose UIUC for the reason that I am somewhat inclined toward theory. If you don't know specifically what you want to do for research, then you will probably have more freedom to explore at a bigger department. Many biostatisticians have their PhDs in statistics, so this decision probably wouldn't close you off to opportunities after graduation. I'm sure that you will probably have to work harder on your mathematics at UIUC than Emory. If you are strongly attracted to the department culture or location of Emory, or if you are not interested in theory or a lot of math, or if you are confident that you want to do work in biostatistics, then you should not listen to my opinion at all.
  6. I hope you all have been having a spectabulous Spring and are excited about your options for this Fall if you have been applying to schools this season. I've been lucky to receive very good results for my PhD applications, and I do believe that I'm ready to make my decision. However, I would like to crowdsource my question just for that last drop of insight, and maybe also because I'm curious: which statistics PhD program between University of Chicago and Carnegie Mellon University would you be most inclined to choose (if those were both your best or only options)? The typical points of comparison I've approached are along these lines: UChicago has a more comprehensive theoretical program with many courses and course options, offers somewhat safer summer funding to most students, and has collaborations with nearby institutions like Toyota Tech and Argonne; CMU has more freedom built into their program without qualifying exams or as strict and intense a course load, emphasizes interdisciplinary work and applied projects more, and is located in a safer and more affordable neighborhood. I think that these may be enough to decide which department culture is more to one's general preferences, but it's not a total and unilateral comparison. I have met current students at both programs who faced the same decision, so I'm confident that there's no wrong answer. I can only truly learn about department culture by living and interacting in the respective environments. As such, I have come to a biased decision from these simple impressions alone and would like to see whether I'm approximately in agreement with the broader community of new grad students in my field.
  7. I am reading about some summer schools in statistics or data science which are taking place (remotely) this summer, and since I find some of them interesting I thought you might, too. I'm not totally sure that all of these are open for anyone or whether they are just for in-house students or for undergrads, but my impression is that recent graduates are allowed to attend. UT-Austin has a Summer Statistics Institute May 24-27. Penn State has a Summer School in Statistics for Astronomers June 1-5. Johns Hopkins has a Graduate Summer Institute of Epidemiology and Biostatistics June 14-July 2. Princeton has a Deep Learning Theory Summer School July 27-August 4. If you have experience with one of these programs, then I would be curious to know what you think the appropriate audience is, particularly whether someone gearing up for grad school (but not yet there) should consider attending.
  8. Undergrad Institution: Low-ranked, medium-sized public university known for engineering Majors: Mathematics, philosophy Minor: Applied statistics GPA: 4.00 Type of Student: Domestic white male GRE General Test: Q: 169 (94%) V: 166 (97%) W: 6.0 (99%) GRE Subject Test in Mathematics: M: N/A Programs Applying: Statistics and mathematics PhDs Research Experience: I attended an REU in coding theory. From this project, I got an authorship on a paper. I also attended a well known SIBS program and have done some statistics consulting for my campus writing center. Awards/Honors/Recognitions: I received a few department awards for "excellence in mathematics" and that sort of thing, and I've been a part of a few winning teams in regional math competitions. I also won a few awards for writing projects and have a pretty solid record of activities outside of math and stats. Pertinent Activities or Jobs: I have minimal experience as a TA for calculus ii, but I have a few years of experience tutoring everything from math and stats to history and writing. Letters of Recommendation: All of my recommendations came from professors in my department, none of whom are famous per se but each of whom knows me well. Math/Statistics Grades: Abstract Linear Algebra (A+) Group and Ring Theory (A+) Commutative Algebra (A) Algebraic Geometry (In progress) Advanced Calculus I (A+) Advanced Calculus II (In progress) Measure Theory (A+) Mathematical Statistics (A+) Introduction to Probability (A) Financial Mathematics (A) Design and Analysis of Experiments (A+) Regression Analysis (A+) Introduction to Applied Statistics I / II (A+ / A+) Introduction to Topology (A) Algebraic Topology (In progress) Dynamical Systems (A) Partial Differential Equations (A) Any Miscellaneous Points that Might Help: I have a pretty long list of various activities that each on their own aren't special but, when united together, form a CV so mean it makes medicine sick. (I just have a lot of extracurricular stuff. It's like I went to high school for college.) Applying to Where: (Color use here is welcome) Boston University (Math) / Rejected Michigan State University (Math) / Accepted (Declined) Northwestern University (Math) / Rejected Pennsylvania State University (Math) / Accepted (Declined) University of Illinois - Chicago (Math) / Waitlisted (Declined) University of Maryland - College Park (Math) / Pending University of Michigan - Ann Arbor (Math) / Pending University of Wisconsin - Madison (Math) / Rejected Carnegie Mellon University (Stat) / Accepted Columbia University (Stat) / Rejected Duke University (Stat) / Accepted North Carolina State University (Stat) / Accepted (Declined) Ohio State University (Stat) / Accepted (Declined) University of Chicago (Stat) / Accepted University of Michigan - Ann Arbor (Stat) / Pending University of Minnesota - Twin Cities (Stat) / Pending University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill (Stat) / Accepted (Declined) University of Wisconsin - Madison (Stat) / Accepted Reflection: I was quite anxious about my applications because I felt that my background was not brimming with research and gleaming with prestige, and I made two mistakes as soon as I finalized my list of options. Firstly, I should have been more assertive with my picks of stats programs. I didn't need to apply to every good school that I thought might accept me, and I could have reached just a little higher just for the sake it. Don't get me wrong - I'm extremely pleased with my outcomes and grateful, too. I did not expect to get accepted to Duke or CMU or UChicago and am still limited in my imagination to dream at this level. I probably could have passed on NCSU and UMinnesota, which are not as good fits for me, and instead thrown my hat in at Harvard or Stanford literally for no other reason than to see if it might've been possible. I probably wouldn't have chosen them if I did get accepted I suppose, but I admit that I do wonder. Either way, though, I realize that it would have been totally okay to take a gap year if I didn't get any acceptances for the reason that I shot too high and didn't play safely, and it would have saved me a few hundred dollars too. Secondly, I should not have gotten too excited about math programs - there's nothing wrong with math, but it's obvious to me now that I am supposed to devote my life to studying statistics. I hadn't spent a whole lot of time doing statistics, and the bells and whistles of Pure Math were always tempting me; any time I browsed YouTube or went to a math competition or attended Math Club, that spark of intellectual curiosity inside of me would jump a bit higher. I kept convincing myself that I only was considering statistics as a back-up because it's more profitable or less competitive. Somehow stats were an abhorrence, a perversion, a delinquency, and only were disguised as "a real job" in order to woo weary sailors away from that Ithaca in the ethereal Arts & Science College up above. It took some discussions with my professors and with my peers to climb down from that notion. Now I am more aware of what I want to do with my PhD, writing my statement of purpose became easier for statistics programs than for math ones. I still feel very strangely about my results, honestly. From my perspective, this is the first time in my life that I've felt thoroughly verified for something that I've cared about. I'm not especially clever nor do I have outstanding achievements. I don't attend a prestigious university. I'm like a gritty country boy with a bit of a personality and some facility with math. What helped me stand out, then? If I were to guess why my applications to statistics programs were so successful, I would say that I presented a clear and honest sense of what my goals are and why I'm applying to grad school in my statements. I think of myself as a writer rather than a statistician, and I want to train myself to be the best darn science writer I can be. I think statistics is a deeply philosophical endeavor full of challenges for writers, but it also notoriously invites opaque reasoning when efficiency is prioritized over rigor. This problem, I feel, invites people like me whose competencies conspire to address it through good expository writing, and that is the main reason why I find the subject attractive. Meanwhile, I have some technical skills and want to continue learning and studying interesting problems. I didn't pretend that I am taken by unclarifiable passions for machine learning or statistical genetics, which I don't accuse *you* of doing, but I found it hard to interrogate myself to the point that I could actually say more than that I have similar passions. The specificity and authenticity of my motivation was probably the most affecting part of my application. Toward this aspect of the journey, then, I would advise readers like me who come from more-or-less humble backgrounds to think seriously about what it is that you contribute. Prestige schools are like carnival games; it's worth the price to play. Just remember that in the academic elite people need to know who you are. You don't want to be Charlie Bucket who stumbled upon the last Golden Ticket and found his shoes on the ceiling by accident. I'm facing the fact that I will never feel like the smartest person in the room again, and I'm okay with that (although it's kind of spooky to think that there's going to be someone with a high IQ hiding under my bed). I'm excited to contribute my own experiences and ideas to whichever department I choose, and I have to know that I have that or else I won't be able to function when I get there. Not to legislate on the exception to a rule, but considering my exceptional (meaning atypical, not superior) case, I would like to conclude that there is no "correct" way for one to improve one's applicant profile. As they say, there are many paths up the mountain, but the view from the top is the same. I may not know the first thing about mountaineering, but I think it's a bit like climbing the academic ladder. There are a certain number of cliffs or steep inclines that you will find yourself facing when you choose the Road Less Traveled. You can probably find the right equipment, but you need to be a little lucky to find a good deal or else it's going to be extremely resource expensive. Actually, I don't know how to bring this analogy together. I hope my reflections have been entertaining if not insightful as well as inspiring without being pretentious.
  9. I see. I should probably talk to more students and determine this for myself, but I appreciate hearing your thoughts.
  10. Nope! I hope you've at least heard some good news from somewhere else by now because it's been a long wait.
  11. Hi @kkk123117! Unfortunately I don't really have any useful advice since I'm in a similar situation you are; I'm strongly considering UChicago at this point too. Would you mind expanding on this point (quoted above)? I have gotten the impression that students in the UChicago stat department are motivated to work independently, but I'd like to know what you mean by their having more peer pressure.
  12. For full disclosure, I'm a domestic student, and I've been accepted to a wide range of schools this season. The relative prestige of the programs seem not to correlate with the generosity of the fellowships at all based on my offers. As such, I'm personally trying not to read too much into the implications of fellowship offers on whether the departments view me as one of their top applicants or anything like that. I'd guess some of them are given to me because I'm a domestic student and others are sort of standard (like the summer teaching ones). This isn't to deflate your achievement -- I'd just suggest you factor these into your decision the way you would the stipend offers. If it means a significant difference in your quality of life, then be psyched. If it's a paltry differential, then I'd let it not be a distraction from more important criteria. I think TA requirements are like prelim requirements -- if you really don't want to teach (resp. take prelim exams), then this matters a lot, but if you don't know what to think about it, then don't worry about it. Practically everyone does it, so chances are that you'll be fine. I personally would like to teach in grad school as much as is reasonably possible, though, so don't take my word for it. What is your opinion on teaching? Do you intend to pursue a career in academia, or will it be a distraction from better things for you?
  13. It's possible that there was a clerical error. Now I have to know: have you received any clarification back yet?
  14. As someone who is also stuck between closely matched choices, my two cents are that you should go with your gut at this point. Everyone is telling you that you can't make a wrong pick. If you really can't peg one or the other as the best for your career, then let location and environment be the deciding factor. If that's the deciding criteria after all, it sounds to me like UFlorida is the place to go. You say you think you'd like the weather more than the others, not to mention that others cited research interests of faculty as probably a better match for you at Florida than elsewhere. I'm sure you have plenty of time to think on it, but if I were you I think it'd be as simple as that. As for my situation, I've run the same simplifying calculation as I did for yours. It's still not easy to dismiss the other acceptances I've received. I'm excited about everything, everyone, and everywhere! Why must I only choose one? I ask myself. But in the end I rationally know which program I have to go to. I'm not sure if my attitude helps with the decision, but there it is.
  15. In these days of virtual open houses and scrolling eclectic fora for useful info on what the heck kind of towns they are in which we're planning to spend the most stressful five years of our short lives, I really want to get a better sense of what people think about the schools I'm considering on the level of comfort and personality, not ranking. I happen to be a domestic student from a medium-sized public university with offers from some very reach-departments, and it matters to me that I don't end up somewhere that is grossly individualistic competitive since I know that I will need to grow a lot wherever I choose to study before I can handle that sort of pressure. I've been chatting with some faculty and students from some of the programs that have already accepted me, and I've gotten only good vibes so far. For example, one faculty member at the University of Chicago described the students as being very good at coordinating with each other (although the preliminary exams are still a gauntlet). A PhD student at the University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill told me that they have a friendly, small-town feel without compromising on big city opportunities. I am also holding out to hear from the University of Wisconsin - Madison, Duke University, and Carnegie Mellon University as these are somewhat in purview right now, but I want to open this question up beyond my personal scope. What anecdotal evidence or impressions have you gotten of the culture at a top statistics department? I'd love to hear anything and everything from anywhere and everywhere; "top" might mean top 50 or top 100 to you, and that's still relevant to the conversation. If you have attended a top statistics university for your undergrad too, then your contributions are more than welcome.
  16. Please don't take this the wrong way -- if you "need to start working," then what are you applying to grad school for? I ask this rhetorically because I'm sure it's a complex story with difficult decisions, but what I really want to know is how a PhD and an MA can both be options for the same person. If you obtain a PhD, what will you do? If you have plans for how you would use such a high-powered degree, then go for the PhD! No question. It may be less convenient because of location and proximity to family, but if you have the option to leave with an MA if you change your mind then there's no harm, no foul, and you're not really worse off than you would have been otherwise (plus the fact that funding is taken care of). As a counterpoint to the benefits of being in a better city versus a worse one: will you have time to enjoy your different job opportunities and the city around you while you're in your program, anyway? Will the distractions make it hard to be productive? Then, of course, if you applied to a PhD just because you felt an obligation to try, or you just wanted the option, or you don't have any intention of using a PhD even if you had one, then go for the MA! No question. It may not be funded, but you can earn money back. You can't earn years back. If the city life and the job opportunities are important to you, then go get 'em. As a counterpoint to the benefits of funded versus unfunded programs: the most important thing is what you will be doing after the degree. If it's not a financially responsible decision, then that's probably a sign that you need to ask yourself again why you are applying to grad school. Anyway you slice it, though, there are no bad decisions for you to make. Only good ones.
  17. I'm surprised that you are torn between vastly different fields because I am in a similar situation. I am sure you are right that the geography route makes more practical sense than history in terms of job prospects. Additionally, I would guess that your UKentucky stipend is comparable to your UDelaware stipend when adjusted for cost of living, so that probably shouldn't much of a factor. You have basically worked yourself into a corner where you have two vastly different options, neither of which is obviously better than the other nor obviously bad. Maybe you need to ask yourself again what it is that you are pursuing a Master's for. Is it because you want to chase down more research in something that excites you? Then UDelaware is the obvious right choice. Is it because you want to grab job opportunities with a skill level-up? Then UKentucky is the obvious right choice. If you don't know which option is right, then you might prefer to take a gap year and hone your interests. Don't take my advice, though. I'm sure you know deep down what's best for you.
  18. I hope you don't mind my saying that this sounds like a situation only sit-com characters find themselves in. The dramatic irony is pretty rich, and I can only imagine that you are terribly frustrated by it. Please don't let me upset you if I sound flippant because I just want to give you a distant stranger's opinion. This might sound harsh, but I would bet that no one who has shared your post and listened to your story besides personal acquaintances have any real stake in your outcome. I believe you have an impressive story that affected them all, but I wouldn't expect anyone to check back in and make sure that the story remains consistent with reality. Tell your friends and family how a funny thing happened and now you have an even better opportunity. Share it publicly if you like, but don't expect it to go viral. The internet got their underdog story and will be just fine whether or not you want to go to Stanford.
  19. I'm not sure if this is still an ongoing point of interest to you, but I claim without proof that there is nothing stopping you from climbing to a top school from any mid-tier MS program (or even maybe a low-ranked one). I think your opportunities will be limited by the research and work you put in and not where you came from. That just means that if you are somewhere that isn't a name brand school already, then you should try to make up for that by being fantastic (broadly construed). My only evidence for this is that I'm in a family of a few grad students. Some of my siblings including myself went to small, regional, not prestigious undergrad institutions and then went on to excellent grad programs. You aren't condemned to mediocrity, which is not to say that you have a guarantee of something that will satisfy you. Another thing to keep in mind: It's not worth going somewhere prestigious just to impress people. You need to really have passion to survive the toughest programs. Being the first in your family to go to grad school, there's no justification for the feeling that you're not good enough. Microbio is nothing to turn your nose at at any level.
  20. Seeing that these are more vocational and skill-based programs, my choice would come down to which city I want to live in and not the programs themselves. (There may be qualitative differences between the programs of which I'm unaware.) For this reason, I would choose either DePaul or Drexel. (Cincinnati is a cool city, but marginally less than Chicago and Philadelphia. I don't know about GMU.)
  21. I would choose the funded one, but that's a very personal decision with lots of needed nuance. Your choice should depend on lots of things. If you are going into a really marketable topic like data science, then you probably need not be too averse to risk. If instead you are going into, say, art history, then there is good reason to weigh your financial situation greatly. Since you are pursuing a Master's and not a Ph.D. (at least not yet), I am inferring that you are pursuing a career that doesn't demand prestige (like academia) and is more skill-based. If that's the case, then a Master's program with a poor research fit is probably not mean that much. I don't know the situation, so I can't rightly judge this point. If you are interested in pursuing a Ph.D. eventually, or if your subject is super research-oriented, then it seems like this is a non-decision: you have to choose one which is the best research fit. You may save money going to a program with funding, but it's a big waste of time getting a degree that you don't want! Would you like to share more about the kinds of program you are getting into?
  22. I got an email this morning from someone at Duke Graduate Admissions asking for some clarification about something on my transcript. Whether this is good for me, I don't know, but there's a clue to their timeline for you.
  23. As a fellow applicant during this stressful application season, I can sympathize with your issue, but I would say that your references probably aren't that problematic. I think that a master's student in your position needs to show good preparation for research moreso than coursework. The fact that you have some good research-related references can only be good for you. Have you displayed a good math / stats background in your application outside of your letters? If your grades are up to snuff, then the answer is probably Yes! Would it help to have a mathematician write well of you? Of course it would. It's probably not a good idea to include one's letter just for the sake of having it, though. You may not have as strong a profile as you would like to have, but I think the most important thing is that you have someone who knows you professionally and thinks well of you.
  24. It may be a problem that you haven't yet gotten into real analysis or "proper" abstract algebra even if you do have some other tough courses on your list. Since you are an international student too, you might want to aim a little lower. Unfortunately, UC Berkeley and U of Chicago are probably out of the question. Maybe try for more big state schools like Texas A&M and Purdue and fewer elite or private schools. That might increase your odds of success. You might want to consider applied math programs since your preparation seems to favor applied math. I'm not totally sure whether operator algebra is predominantly an applied topic, but I would bet it's common enough in large departments.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use