mutualist007

I'm reevaluating a lot of things now, so at this time none yet. Yourself?

Check on your letter writers to make sure they know your work well. And really try to find out what your POIs are looking for in a grad student. I sometimes found it hard to break through, but if you keep asking they will tell you eventually. But you can't possibly do worse than I have (not applying to anthro programs now, but did for years since 2010 and didn't have much luck inspiring confidence or selling myself I suppose.)

How exactly does one do that? Can you break that down a bit into digestible, replicatable pieces? Some of us have been trying for years with decent scores and GPA. I know my problem them and now was field experience and maybe fit because my SOPs may have not been exactly the SOPs they were looking for.

Today I began a new day with a new perspective. After reviewing my choices this year I realized that there were some I just was not really jazzed about. I was excited about what they might could be or could do for my career, but not enough otherwise about the research. But I felt I had to make a choice. Issues of geography, career promise and actual interests were often at odds. I have no answers for how to balance what excites a person with making sensible choices that will lead to job security, but there has to be something in your education and job potential choices that leads you to an "excitatory" state for your research interests. I started this journey with an interest in behavioral neuroscience and in translational research in mental health. Since that's where I gravitate, I can focus around that make connections as necessary. It doesn't matter if I failed a dozen times before. I will just be smarter and more dedicated about it next time around. “To be everywhere is to be nowhere.” ― Seneca, Letters from a Stoic

Thanks everyone for contributing your input. I'm moving into a better place and ready to charge into the next rounds. I feel good.

I was struggling more with the family/personal issues this past year. Now it's just me and I'm free to pursue my interests and goals solo. I've asked past recommenders about weaknesses and never got definitive answers. But for now I am going to assume that I need to be at the top of everything. I've come close to being published but never quite made it past review on papers as a second author. I will assume that I need to have everything else that top candidates have, even if that means finding a mentor while I'm not in school anymore.

That indeed is a miraculous turn around. How does one apply and get accepted to present posters at conferences, and get "second and third" author on two publications all before a new application season? I'm not in school now, and struggling with employment and personal/family issues.

I think I asked the wrong question but I appreciate that you listed these in order of importance. But how can one quantify a baseline for the quality of LOR and the number of publications or amount of research experience? What GRE scores are safely high enough?

I realize I wouldn't just use any past employer. the employer in particular was the VP of Science, and R&D at a Biotech company, and I was involved in some bioinformatics and analysis afterwards that may be used in product development and research publication. The experience was as academically intense as any situation I encountered in graduate school although I had to dig deeper into genetic and computational background than anything else. I also got to do some statistical analysis as well. I don't know if that kind of job background would matter as much but I thought it would help round out my application and background.

Wouldn't it be nice if rejection letters could provide specific actionable feedback? Tell me what was lacking and I will work hard over the next year to change that. Thanks!

I have one Master's degree and am about to finish an MPH. Will the committee consider weighing in the Master's degrees work when looking at my GPA?

One more: What kinds of references are best? Did I make a mistake having my former boss do a letter? Should all LOR come from professors?

What are the essential basics needed for serious consideration anywhere at any program? I can say what I have, but I am curious to get feedback on generalities rather than specific feedback on my background. The categories can include: The ranking of your undergrad school Effective mentoring in school GRE Research publications Conference presentations Work experience Letters of Rec Personal statement content Other factors not mentioned above. Thanks!

Bottom line: Do any programs have April or May deadlines for PhD programs - OR are there any programs of any type (like distance programs) that have rolling admissions? I'm not giving up and will stubbornly punish myself if I have to in order to keep fighting for an admit. This is bucket list level stuff for me. I have 2 more late decision schools for this year, but neither are in Psychology. Please try to understand the perspective of someone who has applied for 3-4 years and only received 1 unfunded offer out of over a dozen applications. I can't afford nor find 10-12 applications a year, so understandably I'm limiting myself.

I've definitely accepted that it this point it would take a miracle! I guess I will embolden myself to reach out and ask again so if indeed it is rejection I can move on and maybe stop distracting myself with dreams about "what if".

I am waiting on a decision letter from Georgia Tech (PhD, ... Psychology). Until late last week the status was "to Dept. for review". It was finally changed to "Dept. Decision Made" but I still don't have a decision letter. A large part of me has accepted that this means I was rejected, but the dragging on with no official decision has me also ready to consider that perhaps I was on a waitlist. I contacted someone else who applied and they confirmed that their status was changed and they already received a rejection letter as of 7-10 days ago. So now I'm asking for input and discerning judgement. Is it safe to say that I'm rejected and that I need to move on to whatever may be next?

Still checking for updates and still seeing "To Dept For Review". I emailed on March 23 and asked about status updates. The response: ... we are very late getting decision letters out this year. We accepted a very small number. You should receive your decision letter by email by tomorrow. Should I interpret that to mean that everyone who was accepted was already notified - rejection letters are forthcoming? I have decided to accept that I've been completely rejected, but it's hard to completely accept that option when no updates are forthcoming.

Thank you. I'm still checking the status updates and waiting. The status remains 'To Dept For Review'

For anyone reading this in 2017, the overwhelming answer is no. That amount of loans would only be worth it if you were considering an MD as a Psychiatrist and also wanted to add a PhD. Unless you got a grantor to sponsor you so that the loan would almost be interest free - and place you in a job with a under-served community.

I applied to the Cognitive Aging program (Psychology) at Georgia Tech for Fall 2017, but my status still says "under review". Should I just assume that all first drafts have been accepted and that I am either wait-listed or will receive a rejection letter via snail mail? Many thanks!

That's just it. I've read every guide there is (I think) on how to write an effective SOP. I've read numerous examples too. The ones I read for Cultural Anthropology at Duke looked very much like my SOP except for the fact that I don't have as many experiences abroad nor do I have a personal background that is interesting or enriching for the program. My SOP has about the same level of detail and specifics for the research proposal and faculty fit sections. I downloaded the examples from Duke and used the second SOP example for the quote below. The second example in particular is very similar to my SOPs in regards to the personal story and issues, and the level of detail and specifics outlined in the paragraphs on research and fit with the program. http://culturalanthropology.duke.edu/uploads/assets/2011-2012GradStmts.doc Since I am not applying to cultural anthropology programs, will my application suffer for not having a tapestry of volunteer work outside the US?

Long time between replies, but here it is. I was kicking myself. I had recently read a lot of testimonials and discussions about the negative effect of greater age and distance between degrees and the likelihood of landing a tenure track job. Perhaps my tone was smug, but my intention was to seriously present another side of the issue and a grim warning about the false belief that "it's never too late". I'm still not sure about my chances in a fourth round of applications, but here I stand not quite ready to move out of the way just yet.

Does anyone have a good overview formula for a winning SOP. I swear I've read dozens if not a hundred, and still I must not be getting it.

I'm not exactly a first generation college degreer, but I'm close since I didn't choose something more vocational like nursing. But within my known family, my generation is really the first. I highly recommend networking like mad and in the process find your "fit" or whatever that really is. Next, build your experience into your "fit". Those areas seem to be the most important factors in anthropology PhD applications. I hope it works out well for you. I am back on the hunt for a fourth application season. Yet I am also wondering when I will hang it up if it doesn't work out well this time.

My advice? Eschew interdisciplinary interests and an your research projects carefully so that they mimic the research of those who you later want to train under and then replicate.