Jump to content

Waitlist Thread


Zukunftsmusik

Recommended Posts

Philosophers of religion are unlikely to get jobs. There is not much of a demand. That's the point, I believe.

 

Which is why my friend has a good strategy. He's doing metaphysics that is highly related to cosmological arguments, but his papers aren't directly related to philosophy of religion. He can trick a program into hiring him, get tenture, and then spend the rest of his career publishing on philosophy of religion. Genius!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He also suggested that Notre Dame has this reputation of producing "philosophers for Christ," which migh play a role in the hiring process.

 

Again, I could be 100% wrong - just throwing it out there.

 

 

FWIW, this is the general impression that other philosophers I have talked to about this issue seem to have. You can even see this crop up in response papers (see Churchland's response to Plantinga's EAAN, for example). It seems to me that this is also the case, given how many people they accept from Biola. 

Edited by MattDest
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FWIW, this is the general impression that other philosophers I have talked to about this issue seem to have. You can even see this crop up in response papers (see Churchland's response to Plantinga's EAAN, for example). It seems to me that this is also the case, given how many people they accept from Biola. 

 

I have sympathy for the philosophers of religion out there. I actually got into philosophy because of philosophy of religion. But you need to distinguish what is fun/interesting in the present from your ultimate endgame. That's my opinion, anyway.

 

This might warrant a separate thread for those into philosophy of religion.

Edited by zblaesi
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if that is true, but I've talked with Rasmussen in the past, and he was struggling in the job market. Having said that, his focus was on philosophy of religion - so it might work differently for someone who is specializing in, say, metaphysics or something. However, I know a grad student at Rutgers who is very into philosophy of religion, and his reasoning was to focus on a non-religious specialization to increase the probability of getting hired out of college. Presumably, he can shift gears into philosophy of religion later once he has secured a position. This guy has expressed major pessimism over the education quality of Notre Dame, I think mostly because some of its biggest names recently retired. He also suggested that Notre Dame has this reputation of producing "philosophers for Christ," which migh play a role in the hiring process.

 

Incidentally, I attended the Plantinga retirement ceremony as a freshman in community college, and I considered referencing it in my statement of purpose or to my letter writers. You know, to paint this impression of extracarricular passion for philosophy. Eric Schwitzgebel advised me against it for the reason that philosophy of religion is looked down upon.

 

I personally don't know what the climate is like at Notre Dame, and I'm just going by hearsay. But it's probably worth taking into consideration. It couldn't hut to look into the placement record and/or contact some recent graduates from the program.

 

Again, I could be 100% wrong - just throwing it out there.

 

Food for thought.

 

There seem to be three points being made: (1) Philosophy of religion is looked down upon. Even if this is true, I don't care. I'm not particularly interested in the philosophy of religion. (2) Notre Dame isn't as good now that several big names have retired (Plantinga, e.g.). Fair enough. Obviously, this is unfortunate, but it's probably not reason "to avoid Notre Dame like the plague." A lot of programs lose stature; a lot of programs (re)gain it. There's a far bit of fluctuation. (3) Notre Dame is reputed to produce "philosophers of Christ"; and admissions committees don't like that. It doesn't surprise me that, by and large, admissions committees wouldn't like that. But it'd be a damn shame if they overlooked the candidate's qualifications simply because he went to a school that happens to produce many Christian philosophers. (For the record, I'm not a Christian.)

 

Anyway, this is an interesting discussion. I also noticed that there are many Biola grads at Notre Dame, MattDest. But I think we're probably jumping to conclusions when we say that Notre Dame should be "avoided like the plague."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, this is an interesting discussion. I also noticed that there are many Biola grads at Notre Dame, MattDest. But I think we're probably jumping to conclusions when we say that Notre Dame should be "avoided like the plague."

 

To be clear: I was being hyperbolic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, whatever. You think it's not a great program to go to.

 

All of this matters a lot to me, since I've been admitted to Notre Dame (and now Indiana) and need to figure out what to do!

 

Yeah, but my thought is fairly superficial. I never even considered applying to Notre Dame primarily because it seems to fall far outside my areas of interest, so I know very little about the department beyond hearsay. But the impression of Notre Dame that has been painted to me is at least worth considering.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

Yeah, but my thought is fairly superficial. I never even considered applying to Notre Dame primarily because it seems to fall far outside my areas of interest, so I know very little about the department beyond hearsay. But the impression of Notre Dame that has been painted to me is at least worth considering.

 

Right, well the impression is not without some logic to it. Anyway, thanks for your insights.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Right, well the impression is not without some logic to it. Anyway, thanks for your insights.

 

No problem! Good luck :D Oh, and someone should consider making a separate thread for this. It's sort of an interesting topic.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting discussion worth having. You guys can discuss what you'd like here since I don't have any moderating powers, but now we have almost a whole page of waitlist-irrelevant stuff in a waitlist thread. I would prefer we take stuff like this to PM or a separate thread so those of us eagerly awaiting waitlist news and movement don't have to wade through a whole page non-pertinent discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm also a UT Austin wait-lister with an AOI in mind/metaethics hoping for an offer. 

 

I'm also currently wait listed at Duke. 

Congratulations. Could you give more information about the notification of Duke waitlist? How did you get the notification (email, website, or other means)? Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Would any one like to venture a guess as to how confident/worried one should be if they are informed they are on a wait-list, but not told that they are near the top of said list? 

 

This is the situation I am in with two schools, both of which I'd love to attend, but I am not sure what the chances are that I''ll make it off the WL. In my mind, a reasonable estimate for the number of students on a 'short wait-list,' which is what most schools seem to keep, would be in the 8-12 range, or even smaller. But, then again, we can see from the results page that wait-list numbers at various schools are high, even though all of us that are 'waiting' are told the lists are short........

 

Oh the stress.... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use