Jump to content

Edotdl

Members
  • Posts

    265
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Edotdl

  1. Even if graduating in 3 years did help, I believe the disadvantage from inherently having a year less of (research) experience would at best even it out, and more than likely hurt more.
  2. I'm taking 3 classes but 1 is 'independent study' (essentially just research), so 2 real classes. Program requires 15 courses, but we're on a quarter system.
  3. I don't think a 4.0 in writing is a make/break type thing - many professors will likely not care. I got a 4.5 for what it's worth.
  4. Sure, you can even email multiple professors "at the same time", given that you aren't just spamming them with a generic email. You won't know who's the best fit for you until you've spoken with them and get a feel for their current research, personality, etc. Disclaimer: I only have experience with PhD programs in the US.
  5. 1. Usually you can only apply to one PhD program at each school (per cycle). MIT is an exception, and there may be others on your list. 2. How many years have you been at your most recent university? I'd say you'd need 2+ to have a chance of counteracting the poor grades for 2-3 years. 3. I'm assuming you don't really mean 'hide', but rather 'overcome', since there's really nothing you can do to hide it (you generally have to send all transcripts if you've taken at least a semester of courses there). That being said, more research, good recommendations, etc. will help compensate for poorer grades and improve your application. Good luck.
  6. I would put Comp Arch/Parallel computing near embedded systems, Optimization near DSP/Info theory, remote sensing near networking and circuits, and MEMs near Nanotech. Just my opinion though.
  7. You could probably go with either Neuroscience or CS. I doubt many colleges will have a major that is that specific (I'm assuming here you're asking about an undergrad program that will prepare you for a PhD studying "the effects of VR in the context of neuroscience"). I think the important thing is to look at the flexibility of the curriculum and the schools course offerings (eg. if you do CS, can you take VR courses and relevant neuro ones). One thing to note, is that no matter how set you are on a PhD now, you might decide otherwise after 4 years or at the very least change the field you're interested in.
  8. I think in general, Master's programs don't weigh research as heavily (vs PhD programs). That said, they will probably expect some level of background in CS/programming. For example, this is from Stanford MSCS (http://scpd.stanford.edu/public/category/courseCategoryCertificateProfile.do?method=load&certificateId=1240861): Expected Background The MSCS program assumes that all entering students have acquired the foundations of computer science at the level of an undergrad minor. At Stanford, these foundations are represented by the following courses, which are considered as the standard prerequisites for the program: CS103 (Logic, Automata and Complexity) CS109 or STAT116 or CME106 or MS&E220(Probability) CS161 (Algorithmic Analysis) CS107 (Computer Organization and Systems) CS110 (Principles of Computer Systems) I'm mentioning this since you only listed math classes. In regards to research, if your neuroscience research was on the computational side, I think you'd be fine. IMO, I'd be more worried about the coursework preparation, since MS is mostly coursework based.
  9. I don't know of anyone personally that has done this. It probably depends heavily on your coursework - i.e. have you taken enough BioE classes to be able to succeed in graduate level BioE classes? Besides some upper level courses, it'd probably be nice to have most of the standard engineering curriculum completed too (Calc 3, Diff Eq, Physics, etc).
  10. -In general, you should be applying to programs that satisfy your research interests. You might find some Chem programs that will allow you do work in bio or Bio programs that seem more welcoming to a chem background. I'm not in the field, but I'd say the transition seems reasonable. -I'd choose the professor you have the better relationship with/you think will write you a better( or more relevant) rec. I had two LORs from young assistant profs and still did fine. -Publications are definitely not necessary. Of course, they do help (quite a bit, usually). -I'm not sure you can get enough/accurate information about funding and PI personality before you apply. These are things that you generally figure out/ask out during interviews or after acceptances. Hope this helps.
  11. I think it depends on how confident you are about whether or not you will be able to get into the PhD programs you want after a year off as a lab tech, essentially doing full time research for a year. The MS, since it includes courses may help offset the GPA (although I think undergrad GPA still holds non-trivial weight even with a masters, since undergrad courses are fundamentally different). If you are able to find a research position in a good lab/prestigious (ie Columbia level) school, I don't think a Columbia MS would be worth the 65k.
  12. Figure out whether your errors are due to insufficient knowledge or careless mistakes - then prepare appropriately.
  13. There is a MIT/Stanford/Berkeley EECS/EE/CS PhD admitted students FB group, if you're interested.
  14. Hey all, I didn't see a Stanford thread for this year yet (seemed like a few people were posting in the 2012 one...), so I thought I'd start one. I'll be starting my PhD in EE this fall, pretty excited.
  15. CMU has a joint ML/stats PhD program, might be of interest to you, if you haven't looked into it already
  16. Probably just a personal investment account. Although you lose out on the tax benefits from a retirement account, it's better than nothing. I also totally agree that the "unearned income" from fellowships is complete BS. You could try to find a side job/TA just to make the $5500 to put into a Roth IRA.
  17. As others have said, I don't think there's any harm in adding it to your CV. Since you state that you'll have to send transcripts, they will know anyways.
  18. Although there might be someone here that knows the answer, I don't see why you don't just email the department. Policies may change over time, and this way you'll know for sure.
  19. For what it's worth, I'll probably end up declining my JHU offer. Good luck.
  20. For what it's worth I'm neuro and other people I've talked to have not heard back yet.
  21. Official acceptance to JHU BME, for those that interviewed.
  22. So for those going to the Berkeley/UCSF Bioe interview, how legit is your presentation? Are you guys going in depth on one project or just giving a brief overview of all your projects.
  23. I've been interviewing with a Columbia EE Professor and he said that I should expect to hear back in a week or so. I think if you've been in contact with a professor expressing interest in having you join the lab then you're probably still in the running. Otherwise, unfortunately, the chances of getting accepted now are probably pretty low.
  24. I got 170Q/162V/4.5AW and got in, although that's just one data point. Also worth noting, there are probably many other factors that are more significant for PhD admissions than general GRE scores.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use