ScreamingHairyArmadillo Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 I'll be 22. From what I can tell it's standard in my field to go for the MS first and then continue on to the PhD, often at a different school. I wonder if I'll be working on apps again 2-3 years from now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gremot Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 I'm in the 26 club Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pamphilia Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 25, and 26 very shortly thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr._Robotnik's_Shadow Posted December 7, 2009 Share Posted December 7, 2009 I'll be 26. I already have my masters. I wanted to go straight from my masters into a PhD (I would have started at 24 that way) but it never worked out so I'm hoping this year will be my year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
prolixity Posted December 8, 2009 Share Posted December 8, 2009 I'll be starting at 28. Yeah, I'm old, but whatever - I don't ever want to work for a corporation again. In Germany, most of the PhD students I met were in their late twenties.. granted, they had to earn their diplom (more or less equivalent to a thesis-based masters) before they could proceed to full doctoral apprenticeship. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LifeIsGood Posted December 9, 2009 Share Posted December 9, 2009 I'll finish my MA next year and, if accepted, will be 39 when I start the Ph.D. I've worked in several fields, owned two business, have three kids and a great spouse. It's a good time for me to start because my professional life has taught me a lot about myself and how I work best, I won't have to be a broke grad student, and my kids are getting to be old enough that they can be more self-sufficient. The hard parts are that my kids and spouse still do deserve attention from me so I can't just bury myself in the library for days on end. Picking up and moving across the country is a bigger deal when I'm selling a house, selling a business, taking the kids out of school, and forcing my spouse to rearrange his worklife completely. It's different for everyone, I guess. I wouldn't have been ready when I was 21, probably not even when I was 31. gezzloume 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
margaretlouise Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I am surprised to learn that many of my fellow applicants are applying straight out of undergrads. That means some people are starting their PhDs at the age of 21/22. That seems so young to me! Well, if I get in next year I'll be starting my PhD at the age of 26. To me it's the perfect timing. How about you guys? I turned 26 in my first year of my PhD, and almost everyone else in my cohort had taken a couple of years off (if not 5-6) after undergrad as well. At school visits (in the decision-re:-where-to-go process), I found this to be the general trend as well. But straight-through folks seem happy, too! I think it just depends on the person. (For those of you going straight through, be sure to take care of yourselves; burnout is a lot more common, understandably!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peppermint.beatnik Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I will be 28 when I start a PhD. I think early twenties is too young to do a PhD in the humanities/social sciences (I have several reasons for feeling that way, which I won't get into). If you're in sciences, early twenties is fine. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rising_star Posted December 14, 2009 Share Posted December 14, 2009 I will be 28 when I start a PhD. I think early twenties is too young to do a PhD in the humanities/social sciences (I have several reasons for feeling that way, which I won't get into). If you're in sciences, early twenties is fine. Awww, come on, go into the reasons! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zilch Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Awww, come on, go into the reasons! because experience in the sciences generally means familiarity with experimental methodology, specific equipment types, etc. All of which can be gained in either grad school or industry. Also, for most of the applied sciences, it's beginning to shift towards the M.S. being the professional degree. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScreamingHairyArmadillo Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Awww, come on, go into the reasons! I have a feeling this could explode into a firestorm... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
peppermint.beatnik Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 I have a feeling this could explode into a firestorm... Yeah, that's why I don't like to get into it. In humanities/social sciences, it essentially boils down to life experience/emotional maturity. I have a lot of thoughts about this, but I refrain from commenting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rising_star Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Yeah, that's why I don't like to get into it. In humanities/social sciences, it essentially boils down to life experience/emotional maturity. I have a lot of thoughts about this, but I refrain from commenting. Totally not cool to say that and then say nothing else. What do life experience and emotional maturity have to do with doing research in the humanities and social sciences? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ColorlessGreen Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 Totally not cool to say that and then say nothing else. What do life experience and emotional maturity have to do with doing research in the humanities and social sciences? Gotta agree here. Emotional maturity is something that's useful in any field, and one's life experiences shape the choices one makes of school or program, but I don't see how either of these things is especially relevant in the humanities and social sciences. Maybe for philosophers or moralists starting at an older age might be a blessing, due to the importance of a deep understanding of human nature in those fields, but it seems to me like most research in other fields can be undertaken at any age, given the proper training and motivation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mlle Posted December 16, 2009 Share Posted December 16, 2009 (edited) Eh, I would say that understanding human nature is a (or the) major component in any of the social sciences and humanities. I took peppermint's comment to be referring to the fact that the social sciences and humanities are reflexive fields, they are concerned with human nature as much as with "pure" research. I started my MA in the social sciences at 24, graduated right before turning 26, and then fled into a professional program instead of a PhD because social science academia was too overwhelming for me. I sometimes wonder whether things would have panned out differently if I had waited out the turmoil of the first half of my twenties and started grad school in the field that interested me a few years later. Obviously, I was not one of the precocious grad students....I think a majority of people start their PhDs early in this field and maturity is not an issue. But for many it is. I guess it's a self selection process. At any rate, I think it's silly to get all roiled up over the issue. Edited December 16, 2009 by mlle Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
melusine Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 I'll be 23 if I get in and from where I come from (Europe) that's considered old. I graduated high school in France in 2005 and most of my high school friends are either Masters' graduates with jobs or going into their Phds, although most are definitly more into joining the work force in their respective fields.. Anyway, my point being that "maturity" as such 1)- has little to do with a person's actual age, and more with the invornment they're in, 2)- plays a much smaller part in a scholar's or specialist's research activities or employability than the skills and motivation acquired as part of their previous studies. To give you an example, one of my good friends is 22, has a degree in media studies and is a junior attachée communication with one of the biggest press agencies in France. Or, better yet, another friend who, at 23, has just opened her osteopathology practice adjascent to her dance studio. She's also already divorced, which although hardly an accomplishment, often intimates that she possesses that elusive "maturity" people keep harping on about... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coyabean Posted December 20, 2009 Share Posted December 20, 2009 I'll be 23 if I get in and from where I come from (Europe) that's considered old. I graduated high school in France in 2005 and most of my high school friends are either Masters' graduates with jobs or going into their Phds, although most are definitly more into joining the work force in their respective fields.. Anyway, my point being that "maturity" as such 1)- has little to do with a person's actual age, and more with the invornment they're in, 2)- plays a much smaller part in a scholar's or specialist's research activities or employability than the skills and motivation acquired as part of their previous studies. To give you an example, one of my good friends is 22, has a degree in media studies and is a junior attachée communication with one of the biggest press agencies in France. Or, better yet, another friend who, at 23, has just opened her osteopathology practice adjascent to her dance studio. She's also already divorced, which although hardly an accomplishment, often intimates that she possesses that elusive "maturity" people keep harping on about... What an interesting cultural commentary. I cannot imagine being 22 with that level of accomplishment, but I was a loser. Also as one who has been divorced let me just say that it is the most expensive maturation you can get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
swisnieski Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 24, on the cusp of 25. I'll be applying straight out of undergrad is the sad thing -- I started primary education a year late and it took me six years to get my BA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hubris Posted December 21, 2009 Share Posted December 21, 2009 I'll be starting at 28. Yeah, I'm old, but whatever - I don't ever want to work for a corporation again. In Germany, most of the PhD students I met were in their late twenties.. granted, they had to earn their diplom (more or less equivalent to a thesis-based masters) before they could proceed to full doctoral apprenticeship. Same. Corp life has been good to me, but... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NEPA Posted December 24, 2009 Share Posted December 24, 2009 I am surprised to learn that many of my fellow applicants are applying straight out of undergrads. That means some people are starting their PhDs at the age of 21/22. That seems so young to me! Well, if I get in next year I'll be starting my PhD at the age of 26. To me it's the perfect timing. How about you guys? If I'm accepted, I'll be one of the right-out-of-undergrad crowd: 22. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johndiligent Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 If I get accepted this year, I'll be starting a 2-year MA, and if I get accepted on time the next round, I'll be starting my PhD in Fall 2012. I'll be 27. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UnlikelyGrad Posted December 28, 2009 Share Posted December 28, 2009 because experience in the sciences generally means familiarity with experimental methodology, specific equipment types, etc. All of which can be gained in either grad school or industry. It's a little simplistic to say that that's all you need in the sciences. What about the ability to think outside of the box--to do things without being told exactly what to do by your advisor--to see something going wrong and figure out that it means that your original hypothesis is wrong, but the phenomenon could be explained by______? FWIW, I started at 37. No experience in industry, and only one year as a post-bac (age 36) taking classes and doing research. My PI was really impressed by my performance--I picked up the skills I needed faster than the other two in lab (having had to teach myself so much for so long, learning new things was a piece of cake), and I was always thinking about the research from interesting angles. Whenever I had free time, like when I was waiting for a simulation to finish, I'd mess around, trying to apply different principles to the same situation. I *never* would have done this if I'd gone to grad school straight out of undergrad. I'm not old, just aged to perfection. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
luar de ouro Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 I'll be 23 if I get accepted next fall. Took a year off after I graduated to take some non-credit classes, though now I wish I applied for an MA for this year so I have a better chance of getting into a Ph.D program Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Vallier Posted December 29, 2009 Share Posted December 29, 2009 24. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
intextrovert Posted December 30, 2009 Share Posted December 30, 2009 (edited) I'd be 25. That's one of my "scary ages": an age at which, when it still seemed distant, I imagined I'd have my life together. I really hope I get in for so many reasons, but hitting my 25th birthday with a real direction is definitely one of them! Edited December 30, 2009 by intextrovert Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now