Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

To those who are applying to unranked programs, which ones do you have in view/are you applying to?

(Provisional definition: an unranked program is a program with a PhD in philosophy, yet does not appear on the top-50 US or top-50 english speaking world. They may appear on specialized lists. E.g., Texas A&M, University of Sheffield, etc.)

Mine?

  • Purdue
  • Urbana-Champaign
  • Buffalo
  • Michigan State
  • Loyola

Some of them have many faculty under whom I could easily and joyfully study. Even some of them are preferred (faculty-wise) over some ranked schools. (Not giving examples!) Some pay better, too. E.g., Michigan State University has a massive stipend: $21,500. (Compare this with Wisc-Madison, which apparently has only $11,600 yet ranked 21st on top-50 US)

Edited by Turretin
Posted

Most Canadian schools aren't on the top 50 ESW list (and surprisingly, also not on the top 50 US list!?!?!), so I guess those are technically "unranked".  Mine are: Boston U, Washington Seattle, McGill, Alberta, Calgary.  I might also apply to a couple really really unranked Canadian schools (Guelph, York) because we desperate, fam.

Posted

I had applied to several unranked schools that were sort of "boutique" philosophy of biology departments (Utah, Cincinnati, Arizona State HPS, etc.). I seriously considered attending them over other "higher ranked" offers. 

Posted

Related question: given that you applied to unranked programs, what drew you there? How'd you find them? When someone says that an unranked program is a foolish career move, what is your justification to believe otherwise?

Posted

Yup, as someone with continental leanings, most of my programs are unranked (10/13 of the PhD programs I'm applying to). I found out about the programs by word of mouth, searches for programs strong in my areas of interest, and researched them based on faculty work and recent placement, like @KevDoh

In response to career concerns, I guess I'd just say given my interests, this was the method that made the most sense to me and makes me feel like I have the highest chance of success (both on just getting in, and on getting enough training in my areas to make me competitive going forward) :) Hopefully, whatever route we choose, it will work out for all of us!  

Posted
On 12/31/2016 at 1:17 PM, Turretin said:

Some pay better, too. E.g., Michigan State University has a massive stipend: $21,500. (Compare this with Wisc-Madison, which apparently has only $11,600 yet ranked 21st on top-50 US)

Be careful with this, many schools are cagey as to whether tuition is taken out of that stipend amount or if the stipend is on top of tuition. Such a gap like that makes me think W-M takes tuition out of that number. 

Posted
5 hours ago, psm1580b said:

Be careful with this, many schools are cagey as to whether tuition is taken out of that stipend amount or if the stipend is on top of tuition. Such a gap like that makes me think W-M takes tuition out of that number. 

How would you read this?

"Each year the Department sets aside a number of Graduate Assistantships for entering PhD students (we no longer offer graduate assistantships to entering MA students). In the current academic year, graduate assistants received a total financial package of at least $21,523 for a level 1, ½-time assistantship.   This package includes a waiver of up to nine credit hours tuition each term, health insurance coverage, and for out-of-state students, waiver of out-of-state tuition."

I think the word "includes" might be ambiguous, but I read it as stipend ($21,523) + tuition waiver, health insurance as well

Posted
43 minutes ago, Turretin said:

How would you read this?

"Each year the Department sets aside a number of Graduate Assistantships for entering PhD students (we no longer offer graduate assistantships to entering MA students). In the current academic year, graduate assistants received a total financial package of at least $21,523 for a level 1, ½-time assistantship.   This package includes a waiver of up to nine credit hours tuition each term, health insurance coverage, and for out-of-state students, waiver of out-of-state tuition."

I think the word "includes" might be ambiguous, but I read it as stipend ($21,523) + tuition waiver, health insurance as well

 

My reading: The total financial package is $21 523, and requires you to discharge duties as a half-time (teaching?) assistant (it's not clear if that's once a year or every semester). Included in that package is a 9-hour tuition waiver and health insurance (coverage; it's not clear to me exactly what this amounts to. e.g. it could just be catastrophic care, or it might even be just partially paid for; as in, you're cleared by default to pay to access the university policy). Students probably still have to pay fees out of that 21k, however, and it's possible that the tuition waiver is actually only partial (e.g. if full-time doctoral students register at twelve credit hours a term instead of nine).

Posted

One thing worth pointing out, though I fear it's already kind of a cliche, is that {RANKED PROGRAMS} isn't extensionally equivalent to {PROGRAMS WORTH ATTENDING}. In fact, it could be argue that the two don't even overlap that much. Also keep in mind that there are programs that, over the years, have chosen not to be Leiter-ranked. 

Posted
13 hours ago, Turretin said:

How would you read this?

"Each year the Department sets aside a number of Graduate Assistantships for entering PhD students (we no longer offer graduate assistantships to entering MA students). In the current academic year, graduate assistants received a total financial package of at least $21,523 for a level 1, ½-time assistantship.   This package includes a waiver of up to nine credit hours tuition each term, health insurance coverage, and for out-of-state students, waiver of out-of-state tuition."

I think the word "includes" might be ambiguous, but I read it as stipend ($21,523) + tuition waiver, health insurance as well

This is how I would read it as well, but I agree that with @psm1580b's point, "includes" could be ambiguous... :/ I suppose once we receive offers, we just confirm everything with the department? 

Posted

The unranked schools I am applying to are: University of Cincinnati, Utah, UW-Seattle, and University of Oregon. For most of these schools, someone (another student or a faculty member) mentioned that there was someone at those schools who I may want to work with. 

 

Question for others, though: even if the quality of your education/the faculty is not dependent on being ranked or not, do you feel as though it is easier to get in to an unranked school? (Of course, I am leaving top ten schools out of this consideration for obvious reasons.)

Posted

Meh, I don't -think- so? But I suppose we'll see. The ones that do offer statistics, it looks as though there's a range of about 4-8% for PhD-track programs and somewhere in the 30% for MAs... I think it's just competitive all around 

Posted

Memphis, Oregon, Cincinnati, Stony Brook, Marquette, Texas A&M, Georgia, South Florida, Purdue, New Mexico

Posted
12 hours ago, Naruto said:

Memphis, Oregon, Cincinnati, Stony Brook, Marquette, Texas A&M, Georgia, South Florida, Purdue, New Mexico

Cool! We have a few of those in common. May I ask what your AOI is? 

Posted
11 hours ago, goldenstardust11 said:

Cool! We have a few of those in common. May I ask what your AOI is? 

Philosophy of mind, feminist philosophy, philosophy of race and gender. Memphis is my top-choice unranked program!

Posted

From reading over this board, Michigan State's financial offer sounds similar to the way that University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee does.

http://uwm.edu/english/graduate/graduate-resources/financial-assistance/

$15,000   GTA salary (9 months)
$18,905   Approximate value of non-resident tuition waiver
$5,135   Approximate value of health insurance premiums paid by UWM
-$528   Approximate 12 month insurance contribution paid by employee
-$1,337
__________
  Approximate student fees
$37,175   Total approximate annual value of assistance package for a single, non-resident, doctoral GTA
Posted

Quick side note:
I found this: https://hr.msu.edu/hiring/studentemployment/gradasst/stipendRanges.htm

A level one half-time pays between $682 and $1186 biweekly. They pay about 19.5 times per academic year according to their numbers.

682*19.5= $13,299
1186*19.5=$23,127

The health portion of the SI charge for Fall and Spring is $1,504  ($152 bi-weekly for Fall 2016  and $156  bi-weekly for Spring 2017),  with the remaining $4,700 (477  bi-weekly for Fall 2016 and $487 bi-weekly for Spring 2017) covering the tuition.

Posted
12 hours ago, Warelin said:

Quick side note:
I found this: https://hr.msu.edu/hiring/studentemployment/gradasst/stipendRanges.htm

A level one half-time pays between $682 and $1186 biweekly. They pay about 19.5 times per academic year according to their numbers.

682*19.5= $13,299
1186*19.5=$23,127

The health portion of the SI charge for Fall and Spring is $1,504  ($152 bi-weekly for Fall 2016  and $156  bi-weekly for Spring 2017),  with the remaining $4,700 (477  bi-weekly for Fall 2016 and $487 bi-weekly for Spring 2017) covering the tuition.

So, you're a little bit more than amazing.

Posted
On 1/6/2017 at 0:56 AM, panpsychist said:

One thing worth pointing out, though I fear it's already kind of a cliche, is that {RANKED PROGRAMS} isn't extensionally equivalent to {PROGRAMS WORTH ATTENDING}. In fact, it could be argue that the two don't even overlap that much. Also keep in mind that there are programs that, over the years, have chosen not to be Leiter-ranked. 

While I certainly agree that just because a program is ranked doesn't mean it's worth attending for a certain person because of his or her particular interests, there is definitely a (very) strong correlation between ranked programs and hirability. In that sense, they are very worth attending. I could find the reference for you, but something like 75% percent of tenure-track jobs are given to people with phd's from the top ten schools (part of this has to do with department size of course). So, I think it's pretty verifiably incorrect to say that rank and being worth attending don't even overlap that much. Even if you mean "worth attending" in the sense of "doing good philosophy" or something like that, I think that would be a hard argument to make. For me (and I'm guessing for most people on here), I want to attend a program that does the kind of philosophy I'm interested in, but I also want to get a decent job when I graduate, so ranking (unfortunately) definitely plays a factor in whether a school is worth attending or not.

Also, could you elaborate on your point that programs have chosen not to be Leiter-ranked? I've heard something vague along these lines once about Emory, but I wasn't aware that this was something that actually happened.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use