Jump to content

Monody

Members
  • Posts

    197
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Monody

  1. Thanks for your effort. I have to say that I don't care that much about the surrounding. I lived in small cities and capitals and in warmer and colder regions. I made the experience that I mostly don't care about the area in which I live as long as I can easily shop groceries and find my way to the library. The GRE score shouldn't be an issue. As I said, I will take the test in roughly 2 and a half weeks and got about 162/162 on practice tests nearly two months ago. I am currently focusing on the quant part with about 2 hours everyday to get it up as high as possible. I am currently in the process of contacting profs and in general the feedback so far was good. Those with less overlap are probably Harvard and NYU, but I will probably swap NYU with PennState and Harvard maybe with another. Again thanks.
  2. Thanks for that information. Maybe it is just the media attention, but the recent months were rather frightening regarding Chicago, especially to someone who comes from a country where you simply don't have that kind of violence.
  3. Maybe as another update and also including a question: I arrived at my exchange university a while ago and luckily the prof they with whom I wanted to work with was quite happy about it and also happily surprised that I didn't intend to get paid. In sum, I can help him with his book project, get research experience, and he will write me a letter of recommendation. Couldn't be happier, I guess. I will also take the GRE in three weeks and will send my statement of purpose to the profs who agreed to have a look at it on Monday. Regarding the question, I am currently finishing my BA thesis that I intend to use as a writing sample. Written in Latex, it builds a formal model, derives hypotheses, and tests them. The issue is that I seemingly have to reject all my hypotheses, because the results are all insignificant. I will see whether I can get some support from descriptive statistics, but for now it is pretty disappointing, especially because the data collection as well as the work with the database took at least a month of my time. Do you think that this may hurt my application when I hand in a writing sample which does not reach any significant results?
  4. @Determinedandnervous Thanks as always. I will do the GRE at the beginning of September to be done with it and recently did another practice test (162/166), which I probably can still improve upon. I also took your advise and rewrote my SoP. It now consists of the following elements in that particular order: 1) very short intro ("Hereby, I apply to ... with the intention to ... in the field of ...), 2) recourse of my interests with a short description of my motivation and how it relates to my previous internships (first, interest in the subject; second, focus on academic instead if policy work), 3) brief summary of my undergraduate studies, what I did on the side and a half sentence on how a particular scholarship helped me to spend more time on academic work; I will also added that I am assisting the prof at my exchange university and initiated a research project with a group of students , 4) mention of the paper I am currently preparing with the note that I intend to submit it for review at the end of this year or the beginning of the next, 5) broad outline of the research interest (naming of the field, the factors, the methodology I intend to use, and the reasons why the work is important, 5) paragraph on how the program will help me (specific cooperations with research centres, interesting courses, and PoI; also named how my work relates to theirs), 6) summary paragraph (e.g. program will help me to produce the kind of work that honours the support I will receive). Comparing it to the previous try, I definitely know what you meant. I intend to add the missing information under point 3 and will then send it the profs which said that they were willing to have a look at it. I will otherwise spend the next weeks writing the fit paragraphs for the other programs and will adapt the SoPs to the specific programs more closely once I will have gotten the necessary feedback on the basic one. Two days ago, I wrote to the first person of interest to ask whether she will accept grad students in 2017 and will write the other ones when I prepare the SoP for the specific program. Lastly, University of Pennsylvania recently became one of my favourites especially because of Sambanis and Stanton. I am also having a much closer look at the faculties outside of their offering in method courses and NYU is on a good path to drop out of the universities I intend to apply to.
  5. Extending on the previous post, I would advise you to look at universities outside the US in general. Seemingly most of the M.A. programs are taught in English and qualitative work regularly has a higher standing particularly because of the reasons you mentioned. I, of course, only speak from my experience at German universities and from what I heard from the profs there, but I think that the generalisation is not completely undeserved. You may be gambling on the future survival of qualitative research strictly speaking, but the risk is probably manageable.
  6. @Determinedandnervous and @CarefreeWritingsontheWall Thanks for the feedback and sorry for taking my time responding. I am currently on a seminar that is required for my scholarship and the daily program they organised is keeping me busy. I know that those things Ive to do as well as those I would like to do encompass quite a bit of work, but I am still worried to waste my chances if I don't at least give it my best until the deadline (specifically after reading the stats of the one person who posted a thread a few days ago). For now, I will prep for the GRE to take it in the beginning of September and finalise the theoretical part of my thesis/writing sample until my library has bought the dataset I requested. In addition, I will continue to work on my SOP so that I can send it to some of my profs for some feedback. I am currently quite happy with it, since it is quite honest, but Ive the feeling that simply reading it gives away the feeling that I had no better idea and just put down something generic. To keep it simple I wrote about my experience at the research institute which against all advice (shitty pay, low job security; I actually named these) ultimately convinced me that I would really like to spend my life reading, learning, developing new ideas, and at last teaching, just because I deeply enjoy doing just this. I further added a paragraph about my path to the study of civil war as a subject area (security as a difference in kind, benefits for the population, increase in civil wars, passion for understanding the strategic choices in the interaction of the rebels and the government by imagining myself in their situation and analysing why they deviate from my expectations). Certainly, I devoted a fifth or more to the fit component and inserted some parts here and there which related to one specific program, but overall and as I said, it is honest but in its first look and without further knowledge about me (the fact that my description actually fits how I live my life), it really sound generic and "boring". Well, Ive got more weeks to work on it. But, and now arriving at the topic of the paper, if I have the time I think that I can at least give it a try to further improve my chances. I better try, than spend my time elsewhere and even if I don't finished it in time, I will still be able to do so at a later point. Maybe I can also add it on my CV as a something I am currently working on and intending to publish. Again thanks. Listening to the ever more lively debate about accents from the basement, I will take a shower and get ready for bed to start fresh early tomorrow morning. I hope that you'll have a nice weekend.
  7. I have to say that I recently - and thereby generalising from my own viewpoint - thought about whether or not universities in crime-ridden cities suffer with regard to the quality of their students. Anyway, I will think about it again in the next few weeks, but a while ago when I read a review of an exchange student to the University of Chicago from my university who wrote about getting robbed as a common experience which one should be accustomed to by carrying nothing too valuable but also not nothing to avoid getting shot, I really became skeptical. I just wrote the first 700 words (rough drafting) based on the initial research idea and I will most likely try to work on it to see if I can hand it in early enough. The data should not be an issue; I recently looked up a few datasets, so some merging, tweaking, and testing may take time, but overall it seems to be do-able. The only issue is that I am also currently writing my undergraduate thesis and am preparing for the GRE, as well as moving to another country with all my stuff, so I will have to hone my organization skills a bit. Honestly, the question of the specific journal didn't cross my mind so far, but the Journal of Peace Research seems to be in the right direction based on past content and their journal outlook. I am otherwise certainly interested in any suggestions in that regard, but will definitively check out the specific sub-forum for further information and do some more research on other fitting journals. As always, thank you.
  8. Just to clarify. I am not proficient with R only with Stata, but I don't see why it would be an issue learning it in the next few months to a degree that I am able to replicate the results in the writing sample. Either way, I see the point, that it doesn't add much to the profile since both work fine, even though Ive to say that getting to know that R works with geospatial data was enticing in itself. Alternatively, I am considering to work a bit with Netlogo, because I could incorporate it in my paper for the universities which ask for longer ones (30-50 pages). I checked out OSU and Penn State, as well as the others @CarefreeWritingsontheWall named. I crossed out Chicago and UCLA based on the location (I don't want to get shot or robbed or at least don't want to risk anything unnecessarily), but some of the others are interesting, specifically UMichigan, GWU and OSU. I will have a second look at Penn tomorrow. Do you know if it is possible to get a paper under review in the next 4 months? Ive a research question and the data and would only have to divest a bit more time. As always thanks for the help.
  9. @CarefreeWritingsontheWall First of all, thank you for coming back to me. I checked back with the lady at the responsible office and she now somehow got a signed and stamped sheet of paper which indicates what the grades mean. The LoRs also seems to sort themselves out. I had a discussion with my method prof who studied at Duke and who told me that he will write a great letter. We talked a bit about why I want to study in the US and what kind of general information he should write in the letter. He will also write about the experience his TAs had with me. I will see whether I will replicate the results in R. It just seemed like most use R in the US so that I assumed that it may make a good impression and I will keep your suggestion with the page number in mind. I supposed that this excluded bibliography, graphs, tables, and such. At least, that's how they deal with it at my university. Otherwise, my general papers would be 30+ pages in length which would be insane. Do you have any other suggestions regarding universities I might wanna look at? I always have this mantra in mind, that going to a lower-rated program is toxic to future opportunities in academia, so I chose those most close to my interests in the upper ranks. My interests basically encompass insurgent behaviour in civil war. Not COIN, but currently specifically causes and consequences of different kinds of strategic behaviour with specific regards to the changing media environment. Just to add this and it may sound silly, but I decided against UCLA because of the location and against UCB, because of the kind of press and the apparent mindset of the faculty. Not that I would critique anything, it's just not what I am looking for. I know that a place is not guaranteed even though my current plan is banking on it. I will apply for some exit options, but I may begin praying from December through March. I may have already written this, but I am currently setting up two research groups at my exchange university and am considering to note this in half a sentence or so when something comes from it. I also am thinking about mentioning that I worked for 5 or so years as a private math teacher to 1st and 2nd college students in Mathematics, but I don't know whether anyone really cares. Again thank you for your help.
  10. I yesterday was in contact with a professor who I asked for something like a voluntary research assistantship and he was interested in it, so that we will have a chat in mid-August. That may not be much, but it is at least something presentable and he may be willing to write my third LoR.
  11. @kaykaykay Thank you four your input. I am currently actively preparing for the GRE and as I said will take it at the end of August. As I wrote I expect at least something akin to 166/166/5-5.5. The prof I wrote to regarding a research assistantship at my exchange university didn't get back to me yet, but after consulting with faculty members at my current university, the alternative of asking my former theory prof seems to be a viable possibility, specifically because he knows me and is himself quite well-known. It is apparently less of a big deal, that I didn't have a course with him in the last year as long as the other LoRs are more recent and good. To the third point, Ive started a while ago on the writing sample and it is directly related to what I want to do and will probably be comparatively advanced considering that they don't teach the statistical knowledge necessary at an undergraduate level. Lastly, the fit overall is at least good and at some very good as my research question touches on work that is currently being done. There are some lower ranked universities at which I didn't look, but could have, but that is mostly a result from either the fact that they don't offer funding or have deficiencies in one of my two main areas. As I am currently working on my SOP I will keep your last paragraph in mind. If you have any universities in mind that I should look at, please let me know. I am mainly focused on civil wars, quantitative analysis, and modelling and I didn't have the feeling that there are so many good and funded graduate programs with that combination being at least partially satisfied.
  12. Thank you regarding the proverb. It was already quite later yesterday evening. After further consideration, my fears about her are probably overblown, especially considering what you just wrote. Regarding #2, do you think that it is fine that he is only advised by his research assistant and that we haven't really spoken in person? He has my CV/Resumé and my transcripts as well and I will send him my SOP and my writing sample once I am done with them.
  13. I am applying for PhD programs in Political Science specifically at Princeton, Harvard, Columbia, NYU, San Diego, Duke, MIT, and Stanford. To put it briefly: on the positive side my research interests fit very well at least at over half the universities. It is in general highly related to projects going at different universities and my (highly quantitative) writing sample touches on that. My GRE will be probably around 166/166/5-5.5, as I recently did one of the PowerPrep tests and scored 165/163 and I still have nearly two months to learn all these ridiculous words. Since I began to work on my SOP about three weeks ago and have a concise research project in mind, I have that covered to some degree. On the negative side, I have little actual research experience and my LoRs won't be perfect. I worked for a year at a research institute before my undergraduate studies, but that was in another subfield and even though I had offers to work as a TA or RA I were unable to take them up, because I didn't fulfil the requirements which those who offered them were unaware off surprisingly. The LoRs are an issue, because I had few courses with actual professors in which I wrote a term paper and most only with PhDs. I got one from a professor with whom I had two courses and who advises my undergraduate thesis. At the same time, she has a completely different approach to Political Science compared to mine which makes the situation - let's say - difficult. The second is a renowned professor of methodology with whom I had a lecture and who will be advised by his research assistant with whom I had 4 courses and who I immensely impressed (he asked me to do the TA for statistics). The third is still up in the air, but I am currently trying to get a research assistant job at my exchange university so maybe I can kill two flies with one stone (I suppose one doesn't say that in English) and get a qualified third LoR and some research experience. There are some charity extracurriculars, a bunch of internships, and I also speak 4 1/2 languages, but I am aware that they don't count. I guess I wasted my time again by writing this out once more, because their is no definitive answer, but I will definitely look into the student profiles to gauge my chances. Again thank you.
  14. Thank you for your advice. I probably should worry a bit less in general, but the situation in general is a bit fuzzy. Not knowing how I fare against other applicants is quite uncomfortable, because I am unsure whether I should apply to more lower ranked programs in case that German grades are down-graded in comparison. As you suggested I will most likely just fill in whatever is recommended, so that I don't get disqualified on that ground. Thank you for moving the thread by the way.
  15. Hey there, I am currently preparing my applications for different PhD programs and as an international student I am very much wondering about the conversion of my grades to the GPA. I am from Germany where I stand at 1.2-1.3 on a scale from 1.0 (best) to 4.0 (passed) and 5.0 (failed). My two primary questions are 1) how universities in the US usually convert foreign grades that is for example which service do they use and 2) whether I should write 0.0 as some departments request or calculate my GPA myself and make them aware that I did? I already contacted two offices who were at least unwilling to say anything and regarding number 2), Princeton said I should fill in my German average (1.3), while others urged me to write 0.0. Regarding the latter, till now I read multiple times that admission committees tend to get confused by it and I imagine that you drop out quickly in case that they set even a very low cut-off point at 2.0 or so. Maybe some of you have had similar issues and were able to resolve this conundrum so I would be very glad to receive some advice.
  16. @CarefreeWritingsontheWall Thank you for your reply. I recently was in contact with the admission office at Princeton and they told me that I should enter my average German grade and that during the last season they picked someone from Germany with an average of 2.0 which is relieving since I've a 1.3 (also Princeton has the nicest admission office of all those I already contacted). Do you think that I can use WES to convert my grade? I don't know whether that will make a positive impression since it gives me a GPA of 4.0 which may be inflated. In the last week, I again went to the responsible office multiple times and apparently we do have a grading scale, even though it only says that 1.0-1.5 is very good, 1.5-2.5 is good, and so forth (you fail with anything worse than a 4.0). Funnily enough, WES and foreigncredits use the same scale, but apparently a German "good" is still an American "A" which causes the mentioned 4.0. If you consider a "good" as a "B" my GPA drops to 3.75 which happens if I transfer my grades to the European Credit Transfer System (ECTS) and then to the GPA. The idiocy of this whole affair is really nerve wracking. On the positive side yesterday, I also practised again for the GRE and reached 165/163 with the Powerprep tool. The LoR writers are currently one issue. I will have a strong one from the adviser of my undergraduate thesis and with whom I additionally took two courses. She is well versed in the area I want to do research in, but does not represent my scientific approach (post-structuralism [her] vs rational choice [me]). Probably not an issue, but I would just want to note that. The second reviewer is the methodologist at my first university. I only took one lecture with him (5th best out of 200 in the exam, but still my worst grade with a 2.0 ), but I massively impressed his assistant who directed the statistics courses. I was the first one in multiple years who cleared all the required courses with straight A's (1.0 in the German context) and he offered me the TA position multiple times and seemed disappointed when I told him that my transfer was successful. Since the assistant can't write the LoR, he agreed to advise said methodologist with the letter writing who now has my CV, Resumé, transcripts, and so forth. Number 3 is currently a bit more difficult. I could ask the theorist at my first university which I probably also strongly impressed and who helped me to get my scholarship (countrywide and all levels of education; 1/2000), but with whom I didn't have a course in a year. His scientific advisor with whom I am in good contact, recommended me to look for another, because of that gap. The problem is that most of the faculty with whom I was in contact either only hold a PhD or can't evaluate my scientific research, because I didn't write a term paper in their course. I intended to get a LoR from my exchange university, but the course of the faculty member I intend to ask only starts at the end of November which is well too late. I am currently pondering the question whether I can ask him if there are any opportunities to assist him in his research so that he could actually write a letter and talk about something substantial. I will probably send him an email on Monday on that topic. Related to that I intend to start two group research projects at my exchange universities which will then begin in September and I thought about mentioning this in one sentence or so somewhere, even if we will not have published anything in December. It may also increase my chances with the professor there. I see your point regarding the opportunities I didn't take and am thinking about stressing the fact that most of the methods I applied in my term papers, I taught myself (e.g. game theory or how to create a directed dyadic data set without loosing half the variables in the process [took some time]). Further I agree that the writing sample will be a plus if it is quantitative and I intend to do some research on what is currently the state of the art when it comes to survival analysis. I will also substantiate it with some formal theory and a few minutes ago in the shower thought about repeating the whole analysis in R (I use Stata) to verify that the results are robust to different statistics software (and to show that I can also use R). Lastly, the page count does not seem to be an issue. I think all of the universities I intend to apply to want 20 to 30 or more double-spaced pages and my undergraduate thesis which I want to submit is only allowed to have so many words. Do you know if these pages includes references, tables, and figures? Last question: based on the universities I will apply to and supposing a GPA of 3.8, a GRE of 166/166/5, a strong writing sample, a strong SOP with a clear research statement, prior positive contact with faculty members, and average to good LoR, do you think that I should include more universities to guarantee a place somewhere? Best regards Monody
  17. Thank you for your reply and I am sorry that I didn't mention that but I am indeed applying for PhD programs. If you think that the Americans have a weird scale then you have not seen most of the scales in Europe. Our grading scale in Germany goes from 1.0 (best) over 1.3, 1.7, 2.0, until 4.0 and if your grade is worse you fail. There apparently exists a Europe-wide option to use the ECTS lettering but as I said my university does not have a conversion key or anything like that.
  18. Hey there, I am currently preparing everything for my application this December and I am feeling like I am getting completely mad, because I have no idea how my chances are. First of all, I have no idea how they are going to calculate my GPA based on my grades in the German system. I looked at different calculators online which indicated everything ranging from 3.3 to 4.0 with 3.8 probably being the safest bet (WEI gives me a 4.0). So I reached out to multiple admission offices who told me that they apparently can't tell me how they convert international grades, but that I should include a grading scale with my application which my university (top 1 in my country apparently) doesn't have. It also doesn't help that I read at a couple of places that your chances of getting accepted shrink considerably when you enter 0.0, because the admission committee tends to be confused by it. Also the only grade which really pulls me down is completely unrelated to what I actually intent on doing. It was a course on social structures, cities, and diversities which transferred to my new university. Does anybody know whether such aspects are taken into account by the respective committees? Further, there is no such thing as research opportunities at my university for undergraduates. The contracts usually last for two years, but they only accept you after your second year which means that you have to do your master there as well. Additionally, for most positions they only accept MA students. I even had two offers, one for a TA job to teach the introductory course to statistics and Stata (wasn't possible since I transferred) and another to work with a researcher at a think tank (wasn't possible because said scholar was unaware that his institute requires an enrolment in graduate studies). I would like to include these things, but on the other hand I suspect that it would raise eye brows if I were to talk about offers I didn't take up. Aside from that issue, I wrote at least 10 independent term papers (6000 words usually) and have plenty of experience in that regard, but I don't know if that is comparable to what undergraduates in the US do and whether it counts for anything. I would be very glad for some advice and some outside perspectives on my situation. I will try to briefly summarise the other aspects of application so that you can get a better idea. My CV includes two internships at the national parliament, a 9 months voluntary year of social service at a research institute for sustainability studies where I to a degree assisted in their research, extracurricular activities (member of the youth group of the council of foreign relations of my country and organiser of a project to support disadvantaged students before and during their undergraduate studies), practically two scholarship (one for my exchange year and the other for academic achievement [1/2000, long-term funding]), and a very high workload in all terms (finished all required courses after two instead of three years). I also speak 4 1/2 languages (German, English, French, Italian, Mandarin[1/2]), but I suppose nobody cares for that since everybody speaks English anyway. My LORs will probably be okay. I got one from my first university from the professor above the guy who offered me the TA job but who doesn't really know me. The latter will at least advise him and tell him about me. Another is from a scholar from my current university which will be fine and the third hopefully from my exchange university in Copenhagen but I'll have to see. The GRE will also be alright. I started my preparations 9 days ago and will take the test at the end of August or in mid-September and I am currently at 160/163 (V/Q). At last, my writing sample will feature a hazard analysis with Stata, an overall good research design, and new insights. The universities I want to apply to include Harvard, Stanford, Columbia, NYC, Duke, UCSD, MIT, Princeton, and maybe Emory. My research interest focus on civil wars, authoritarian regimes, and international interventions. I consider myself strongly on the quant and formal theory side. I am sorry that I bombard you with so much text, but I would be extremely glad for some insights on my prospects and general advice to improve them. If you can add something to the GPA issue that would already greatly soothe my mind.
  19. Do you think that submitting a writing sample using quantitative methodology (hazard analysis with STATA) is a good way to signal strength in these areas? I only had two semesters of statistics (German university), but I did a lot on the side which obviously doesn't show up on the transcript.
  20. So after Ive now created a list that consists of universities that interest me. Stanford strong focus on quantitative methodology and IR (apparently), they also have Fearon, Weinstein, Fukuyama, and Krasner whom I find interesting), their program is also fully funded as far as I can see they seem to be very selective Columbia University again a good focus on quantitative methodology and IR, Doyle, Jervis, Snyder, and Fortna interest me, fully funded, partnership with Science Po NYU good focus on methodology fully funded, student housing De Mesquita Emory University again very good focus on methods, authoritarian systems, and IR fully funded, their admission criteria do not seem to be extremely strict Gandhi MIT good focus on methodology, IR, and Foreign Relations Van Evera, Oye other mentions: University of Chicago (interesting, but very high crime rate in the city), UCSD (low number of interesting scholars aside from Walter) I would love to get some feedback regarding the correctness of these assumptions or possible things I missed. I would also be interested to know about other programs I missed but might be interesting.
  21. Firstly, I am really grateful for your advice, unsolicited or not. Regarding the shortlist: what I looked most strongly at so far was the general focus of the department, their respective scholars, and some pros and cons that don't really fall in the former categories (e.g. the crime rate in Chicago, full funding, special strengths in methodology or the partnership of the Columbia University with Science Po). Funding was not something I looked specifically for but I would be unable to attend a program without one even though the scholarship Ive here would probably pay for it to some degree. Ive not yet contacted any faculty members, because honestly it feels somewhat weird contacting someone to talk about something I am personally not yet sure about. Tomorrow I will have another meeting with a professor with whom I already talked about the general idea of attending a PhD program to discuss the selection process with regard to my interests and once I reached some degree of specificity contact some faculty members. As for the number thing, I looked through the forum and it seemed like this is some sort of common courtesy. Also my knowledge of the US system isn't that big, so I considered that the safer option. Lastly, I indeed know that assertiveness is key and I spend considerable amount of time rewriting my texts after the first draft to improve on that. I suppose that its some sort of habit. Again thank you for your advice.
  22. Hey there, I am a current student at the Freie Universität in Berlin (4th term) and am currently strongly considering applying for a PhD program in the US for the fall term 2017. A week ago I started to create a shortlist of programs that particularly interest me. In this regard Ive to say that the choice of the faculties and in connection to that the definition of my main research interest proved to be rather difficult. Starting with the latter I would describe my interests rather broadly as interstate conflict, autocratic systems, civil war and quantitative / formal methodology. Currently I think that these are too broad to justify the choice of a specific program I want to apply too. The university I am currently at and the one where I spent my first two terms at (Humboldt University in Berlin) didn't really offer that many courses in these areas so that I developed these interests based on what I read on the side and I am still unsure what I want to specialise in. I would be very thankful for any helpful thought on how to choose the right faculty and whether my interests currently are too broad and if yes what I should try to do to narrow it down. Some thoughts on my profile for the applications would be nice as well. I studied 2 terms at the Humboldt University with a strong focus on quantitative methodology something the university is known for (at least that's what I was told) and now 2 terms at the Freie Universität where I put an emphasis on IR in general and peace and conflict studies. I will spent the next two terms at the University of Copenhagen (not funded) or at the National University of Singapore (scholarship; German academic exchange service (DAAD)) but I am still unsure which one I should choose. I am currently receiving a scholarship, my GPA is around 3.7 I guess (we use another system here ranging from 1-4; I am at 1.3) and I already did all the required courses and modules aside from my bachelor thesis, but I have not yet done my GRE while my TOEFL is fine (114/120). I suppose that my LoRs will be strong (hopefully 1 from my IR prof, 1 from a comparatist and one from a theorist). Best regards
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use