Jump to content

2023 Neuroscience PhD Applicants and Admissions Results


walterkronkite

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, ManifoldsAreMadeUp said:

I AGREE AND CANNOT STRESS HOW IMPORTANT THIS IS!!!! Having neuro on your PhD almost does not even matter as it's all about who you work with and the work you publish. You can still work in the same neuro labs whether you're psych, neuro, engineering, bio, etc etc the PI just has to affiliate with the given department which is just signing a few forms for them (and most of the time they're already affiliated). Neuro programs are starting to hit admit rates of 1-2% for top programs but at those same schools you will find other engineering/life sciences programs at 15-30%! Even at places like Harvard (compare PiN to SHBT) or BU (GPN has 3% admit rates while A&N has 19%). It makes almost zero sense to apply for pure neuroscience anymore unless you know you're one of the top applicants. 

Noted for next year if none of them work out. Thanks for the info from both of you!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, jamesp14 said:

Does everyone have a tab called "interview" where you can select an interview date under their application portal for Columbia neurobiology & behavior?

 

I haven't received any confirmation yet, but curious if everyone has the option to select an interview date.

I don't :(.

Congrats though!! May I ask if you already had a preliminary interview with them? What are the interview dates? TIA!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hey everyone!

I did deep digging on last years forum and most Ivy’s (Harvard, MiT(ik lol), Brown, Yale, Dartmouth, Cornell, Columbia) and top-tier schools (Uni of California’s, Northwestern, Uchicago, UTexas, Duke, Vanderbilt etc.) will have sent out first rounds BEFORE the holidays (I would say Dec 22, 2022). I did see some 2nd round interviews posted in the forums….

Boston Uni, Indiana, and most state schools will come in January. Be patient! 

 

Also, CHECK. YOUR. JUNK. FOLDERS. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Neurolucida said:

Feels like Neuro programs have been super slow this cycle. Still haven't seen anyone with responses from Yale, NYU, Rockefeller (bioscience), UCSD, Stanford, Penn, JHU, etc

Yeah its honestly like every program *but* neuro PhDs have been sending out interview invites tbh. Other years its been like clockwork though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can someone clarify something to me about how this works? Seeing the buzz about getting interviews: do admissions committees really work that fast? Like for a Dec 1 deadline, the adcoms read that person's SOP, evaluated their transcripts and LORs and put them in a pile of "top candidate--interview" within two weeks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi all!

I applied to UW, OHSU, UofU, UCSD, UCI, UCSB, UCR, and CU Boulder and Anshutz. I haven't heard anything yet, hoping I will soon!

 

Also, does anyone know the point of the UW NetID? and why we need to sign up for it? 

 

Vanessa

Edited by mer1014
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, mer1014 said:

Hi all!

I applied to UW, OHSU, UofU, UCSD, UCI, UCSB, UCR, and CU Boulder and Anshutz. I haven't heard anything yet, hoping I will soon!

 

Also, does anyone know the point of the UW NetID? and why we need to sign up for it? 

 

Vanessa

Vanessa, of these schools, I applied to Neuroscience programs at UW and UCSD. I haven't heard from UCSD. I heard from UW on Friday. It was a mass email requiring interview date choice by 12/22/22. I signed up for UW NetID and it seems like you would only use it to see details about acceptance past the interview stage.

Edited by nm_ml
missing word
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, nm_ml said:

Vanessa, of these schools, I applied to Neuroscience programs at UW and UCSD. I haven't heard from UCSD. I heard from UW on Friday. It was a mass email requiring interview date choice by 12/22/22. I signed up for UW NetID and it seems like you would only use it to see details about acceptance past the interview stage.

Hmmm okay, thank you for letting me know. I checked and did'nt get the mass email ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/18/2022 at 2:17 PM, jamesp14 said:

Does everyone have a tab called "interview" where you can select an interview date under their application portal for Columbia neurobiology & behavior?

 

I haven't received any confirmation yet, but curious if everyone has the option to select an interview date.

I have this tab but every sub-tab says "TBA" 

Wondering what this means. trying to not get my hopes up 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, nm_ml said:

Vanessa, of these schools, I applied to Neuroscience programs at UW and UCSD. I haven't heard from UCSD. I heard from UW on Friday. It was a mass email requiring interview date choice by 12/22/22. I signed up for UW NetID and it seems like you would only use it to see details about acceptance past the interview stage.

May i ask what the interview dates are? I didnt get invited ? but if by grace of god they do another round of invites, i'd like to make sure I dont block their weekends... 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, dotty said:

May i ask what the interview dates are? I didnt get invited ? but if by grace of god they do another round of invites, i'd like to make sure I dont block their weekends... 

Interview days are 2/14-15 or 2/15-16. Good luck with all your apps!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, bearkick said:

Can someone clarify something to me about how this works? Seeing the buzz about getting interviews: do admissions committees really work that fast? Like for a Dec 1 deadline, the adcoms read that person's SOP, evaluated their transcripts and LORs and put them in a pile of "top candidate--interview" within two weeks?

Yes, they really do (http://www.rdgao.com/blog/2021/12/23/). I've never served on committee but I've spoken to about 3 people who have for neuro. Here's a hypothetical admissions review process:

1) Committee convenes and the director pairs up faculty/student reps with each pair having someone who's already done admissions once. If faculty have messaged the committee to "keep an eye out" for a particular student, these may be flagged.

2) Each pair (sometimes trio) is given 50-100 applications to read and they're given 1-2 weeks to discuss and rank. Each team picks their top candidates (maybe 5-10) to discuss in open session. All others don't make the cut.

3) All the teams reconvene and the top candidates are discussed and balanced and approved for the director.

4) The director then takes that list and extends invites.

The whole process can take only a week or two. Applications are read to varying degrees which is highly dependent on the reviewer. Maybe a student rep remembers what it's like to apply and really takes their time reading all of the material; maybe it's a busy junior faculty member with a newborn and they blow through the apps in one night; maybe it's a senior faculty member that is fixed in their views of what a "high-quality candidate" is and just checks off boxes. You never really know. I've heard of people who never read statements of purpose or only focus on LoR's or some other method etc. It's why it's so crucial that if you have a bad circumstance (poor GPA for instance), that you are upfront about it in both your statement and LoRs because then it makes it hard for the reviewer to look at that number and trash your app. 

Why do committees do it like this? It's essentially the same format as NIH grant study sections and (I think) initial screening for search committees (new TT-professorships). A lot of the strategies for a good PhD app mirror what's taught in academia and is known as "grantsmanship". In an ideal world, they'd take their time and carefully review each applicant but in reality, professors are busy people who (mostly) eschew committee work. At least from my time in a neuroscience institute helping screen techs for hiring, it's extremely clear a large proportion of applicants are unqualified so it's pretty easy to chop it down. The remaining people are all excellent and would succeed so it's just a matter of discussing them.

It's also why there's so much randomness in the process even if you are a high-quality applicant. Maybe the committee is trying to balance out all the computational people with wetlab and as such, disproportionately many comp. neuro. people get cut despite being a good fit. Maybe the program just hired two new computational faculty and will want to make sure that these new hires are likely to get students and thus go for a computational heavy set of interviewees. Maybe the lab an applicant wants already took a lot of students last year or they failed to get demonstrable funds this year and would be available for students. There's a huge number of hidden factors.

Edited by ManifoldsAreMadeUp
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi All,

Good luck to everyone this year!!

Figured I'd share my updates. Applied to all Neuro programs, so far have received interview invites from Northwestern (NUIN), Weill Cornell, and Tufts!

Still waiting to hear from (Stanford, Harvard PiN, MIT, NYU, Rockefeller, Columbia, Yale, Mount Sinai, BU, Brown, and UNC-Chapel Hill). 1 rejection so far from UCSF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, just thought I would share my experience and where I applied.

I have a year of experience as a research assistant at Northwestern in the Neurology department. I have a BS in Psychology from a local university and a MSc in Neuroscience from King's College London. I applied to Northwestern, Yale, UCSD, UC Davis, UC Berkeley, Max Planck, UCLA, and the Scripps Institute. So far, I haven't heard from any schools but I am trying not to get too down just yet. Wishing everyone lots of luck and a big congrats to those who have secured interviews so far!

Edited by coffeebean736
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, neurophdwannabe said:

Hi All,

Good luck to everyone this year!!

Figured I'd share my updates. Applied to all Neuro programs, so far have received interview invites from Northwestern (NUIN), Weill Cornell, and Tufts!

Still waiting to hear from (Stanford, Harvard PiN, MIT, NYU, Rockefeller, Columbia, Yale, Mount Sinai, BU, Brown, and UNC-Chapel Hill). 1 rejection so far from UCSF.

Good luck to you too!

I thought Harvard PiN was done sending interview invites after the initial round of emails? Will there be more?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, lowestprime said:

Good luck to you too!

I thought Harvard PiN was done sending interview invites after the initial round of emails? Will there be more?

I heard in past years Harvard PiN sent out multiple rounds of email invites, but tbh I'm not sure if they will do that again this cycle! FIngers crossed! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use