Jump to content

Welcome to the 2012-2013 cycle


Recommended Posts

Thanks! GWU is a great fit for me and I'm not surprised that I was more competitive at DC schools compared to elsewhere because of my background and interests. I also work a block from GW and my boss wants to keep me on if I end up at GW so not being funded as of yet is easier to swallow. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry to hear that- seems like its been a rough week.  At least you have UCSD!

 

Yes! And thankfully they notified early, otherwise I would be a wreck after 12 straight rejections...

 

Still holding out hope for UCLA, but they may be waiting to see how many people decline their offers before making final decisions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Think about your end game: what kind of job can you/will you get when you finish (or do life circumstance making completing the program at one school a higher probability than completing it at another - i've talked to a few people dealing with this, it usually relates to family, relationships, etc.).  Can the "so-so program" reliably place you (assuming that's your goal)?  Will you get sufficient support from the faculty who share your interest at the "better choice?"  If you have one "better" option and one "so-so" option, visit both if you can, talk to faculty, current students, etc. - and then at least you have a frame of comparison.  But only if I had just two choices.  If I got accepted to several "better" options, I would probably choose from among those.  If it were just two,  personally, I would be inclined to lean toward the better option because, sadly, pedigree often also means a higher caliber of classmate (which corresponds to quality of seminars, coauthoring opportunities etc.)  I chose my schools based on fit (where I could put together a committee) from across the rankings with the intention of taking the best ranked among whatever offers, but I know others chose based on where they thought they were likely to be accepted and are selecting the best fit from among their offers, and others who used some other method.  But here we go into that fit v. pedigree debate again... ;)  A page or two ago BFB (whom as we've been discussing is a DGS) responded to someone else's comment in this debate, it is certainly relevant to your dilemma.  

 

Although something to be said about fit, make sure it is more than just that one scholarly crush you dream of working with.  From my MA program I know that choosing based on one advisor and an alternate can be torturous if they both move or take leave the year you are writing your thesis.  

Thanks, eponine997! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Out at NYU, not a surprise at this point.

As long as you have one admit (as you do), it makes all the rejections so much less depressing! You know that you have a place to go no matter what else happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Congrats to Princeton admits! Will they have an official visiting time or something? I haven't heard anything from them on this issue. 

Just got an email about this. 1st-2nd April. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As long as you have one admit (as you do), it makes all the rejections so much less depressing! You know that you have a place to go no matter what else happens.

 

Exactly! And really excited about UCSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The short answer is that, in a lot of Universities, the DGS has less control over outcomes than you might think. Some Departments get a pot of money from their Graduate Schools and can decide on admission and allocation simultaneously. Others, like ours, can make decisions about admissions but only have a limited ability to control funding allocations. In our case, we enter every one of our applicants to an internal, Graduate School-wide fellowship competition, and we have precisely zero control over who wins how much. We have a bit of funding to even out the gaps, but surprisingly little. When we allocate the funding that we have, we have to make sure that we haven't overlooked one of the Graduate School's rules for how it can be allocated and to whom.

 

The finer points are really, really tedious. But the upshot is that what you see as an intentional decision to notify some people at one time and other people at another time may or may not be intentional. In my experience, it's more likely to be the result of a tangled bureaucracy, or of overworked people who can only devote sporadic attention to finalizing admissions decisions, or both.

 

Unfortunately, that cuts both ways: I can't really take credit for being humane, since the Graduate School sends out the admissions letters and the funding letters in two simultaneous waves. 

So I have a question, if you choose to admit someone without funding, does that mean that you don't really care if they attend or not? Or does the department literally not have the resources to fund the student?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have a question, if you choose to admit someone without funding, does that mean that you don't really care if they attend or not? Or does the department literally not have the resources to fund the student?

 

And on that sentiment.....here to claim a GWU admit, but seems there isn't any funding right now.  Happy to get the admit, sad for no funding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

First, congrats again to all the recent GW admits!

 

If you have been admitted without funding or wait listed for funding, be sure to check out http://www.gwu.edu/~fellows/ ... you may be eligible for additional fellowships from Columbian College that will either reduce or eliminate your tuition.

 

Additionally, if you have any questions about the program, feel free to PM me or ask them here.

Edited by GWStudent
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So I have a question, if you choose to admit someone without funding, does that mean that you don't really care if they attend or not? Or does the department literally not have the resources to fund the student?

 

I don't think it means that they don't *care* about whether you attend, but it certainly means that they are less invested in you as a candidate than those to whom they did offer funding.  Of course, it also depends on the resources of the department.  Not being offered funding from a large department with big resources is a bad sign, but the same offer from a small department with limited resources might not be as meaningful.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just heard from Northwestern that I am put on the alternate list, so I assume that as soon as someone rejects the offer, I should be in. This sounds like a wait-list. So, if someone is not going to Northwestern or knows about what "alternate" really means, it would be great if you could PM me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use