Jump to content

Welcome to the 2014-15 Cycle


Poli92

Recommended Posts

There are several ways in which the application process seems to be skewed towards students with US qualifications, unfortunately. LOR writers from US institutions are more familiar, US acadenics are better able to contextualise US than international institutional reputation, GRE prep is bizarre for a UK student (it covers stuff I studied age 14), less of a culture of RAing and TAing before PhD in the UK. The semiotics of marks in the 60s in the UK, especially at Oxbridge, could be the subject of an anthropological study. And, of course, we study "Politics", not "Political Science".

On the other hand, UK students (but not IB students) must specialise from age 16, and BAs are more focused. School level maths covers some undergraduate US maths.

Presumably it is even harder to evaluate students who study outside of the Anglosphere.

I'd be interested to hear whether faculty think it's an issue or not, how they contextualise data from international students etc.

The differences may be marginal... But the percentages of int'l students -- especially when you exclude Canada -- suggest that there may well be an issue.

 

I completely agree. Everything I read before I applied told me that I will have a very small chance simply because I had studied in the UK and that I should consider doing a MA in the US first before applying for a PhD. 

 

The biggest issue seemed to be with LORs but also with grades and research work undertaken. Quite simply put, my understanding is that if there are two students of roughly the same calibre, one who has studied in the US and one who hasn't, the student with an American degree has a huge advantage. This is at least what I gathered from various blogs on the internet, not least Christ Blattman's and Nuno Monteiro's. 

 

PS: This isn't me getting my excuses in early (ha!), it's just my understanding of how the system works. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

PS: This isn't me getting my excuses in early (ha!), it's just my understanding of how the system works. 

 

I think most of us on here get that admissions decision-making is pretty laden with idiosyncrasies and thus aren't going to look down on anyone who tries to make sense of application outcomes. I mean, to a large degree that's why we're all on here, right? To help each other figure out how the sausage is made. 

 

eta: And for the emotional support. Loads of that. 

Edited by Poli92
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checking in. Only applied to three PhD programs. A bit late now but curious... is a 170/162/6 GRE + 3.95 undergrad GPA sufficient for HYP?

Edited by bob123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Checking in. Only applied to three PhD programs. A bit late now but curious... is a 170/162/6 GRE + 3.95 undergrad GPA sufficient for HYP?

I wouldn't go so far as to say "sufficient", but, from my understanding, you will certainly be competitive. Best of luck!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Necessary, but not sufficient conditions." - the math part of my brain

 

Right of course. I think what I really meant is will the 162Q score sink me for comparative politics at those schools?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting (archaic) degree naming system in Scotland is causing a few problems with some international offices...

 

Four 'ancient' universities insist on awarding Masters degrees for four year undergraduate degrees and so a few places have emailed asking where my undergrad transcript is! The EU talks about standardising qualifications, but we can't even manage to do it within one country :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The interesting (archaic) degree naming system in Scotland is causing a few problems with some international offices...

 

Four 'ancient' universities insist on awarding Masters degrees for four year undergraduate degrees and so a few places have emailed asking where my undergrad transcript is! The EU talks about standardising qualifications, but we can't even manage to do it within one country :(

 

So my sincere thanks to the grad secretaries who took the time to check and not just dump my applications. It is appreciated!

Edited by AuldReekie
Link to comment
Share on other sites

162Q abd 170V are very good scores. I also applied to HYP, alongside with several other good schools, and my scores were 161Q abd 163V. Princeton has quite large program, so anything above 160 in both sections should do the trick. I think that the most important thing is to get through cut off points, though it is not clear where these points are located for each school. I think, 160 should be the cut off point in top places. Also, there is a question of reliability of GRE results. For instance, there are two guys, one scored 160, other scored 164. Does this mean the first guy knows math worse? For instance, if the second guy took GRE 5 times and the first took test only one time, higher scores may be due to higher amount of attempts. Also, different versions of the test include different combinations of sections. You can be just lucky with questions, or you just can't solve problems fast enough. Point is, differences in 3-4 points cannot say much. I think, substantive differences start from 5 points. There won't be a lot of people who score above 165 in both sections, that is for sure.

P.S. As far as I know Princeton, Harvard and Yale send their results at the end of February, so waiting will be really annoying. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Does anybody have any advice for an interview? it looks like the Emory interview is with 3 faculty over skype

 

Look over your application to see what exactly you said about yourself and the school. Be confident in your statement of purpose, but also have other areas of interest prepared (assuming you have those). Be confident and charming.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Look over your application to see what exactly you said about yourself and the school. Be confident in your statement of purpose, but also have other areas of interest prepared (assuming you have those). Be confident and charming.

Solid plan -- I have lots and lots of job interview experience, and was wondering if there were any weird idiosyncrasies with this style I wasn't thinking of.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Solid plan -- I have lots and lots of job interview experience, and was wondering if there were any weird idiosyncrasies with this style I wasn't thinking of.

 

I get the feeling that graduate schools want you to have questions, at least more so than do regular employers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use