Jump to content

wittgensteinsbladder

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    50

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by wittgensteinsbladder

  1. wittgensteinsbladder
    Same with me (also MPP). Seems a bit odd that they assign counselors to candidates they’re going to reject.
  2. wittgensteinsbladder
    Lol how do yall know all this?
  3. wittgensteinsbladder
    Where on the page are you seeing this?
  4. wittgensteinsbladder
    Don't play with my heart like that!
  5. wittgensteinsbladder
    I’m curious about the same question. I assume it’s the same funding for the second year, but they don’t make that clear.
  6. wittgensteinsbladder
    In! Anyone know about the process of asking for more funding?
  7. wittgensteinsbladder
    I agree on all your points except maybe #2. For me at least WWS was one of the first policy programs I was aware of in undergrad. So I'm curious what you're basing it being "a less well-known program" on?
  8. wittgensteinsbladder
    I guess I was thinking WWS, HKS, SIPA, but Georgetown and SAIS are probably in there. I was more just trying to get them to be specific about the context -- it comes off as a pretty outlandish account, and it seems like they could include more details while using an anonymous account.
  9. wittgensteinsbladder
    SIPA I’m guessing?
  10. wittgensteinsbladder
    I was called around 1 pacific. Just saw the decision letters in my portal.
  11. wittgensteinsbladder
    Accepted with some $! could be more, but I'm really happy for now
  12. wittgensteinsbladder
    Ah I see that email now, thanks @ayasofaya
  13. wittgensteinsbladder
    Do you know where it says it’s required? I don’t remember seeing that anywhere.
  14. wittgensteinsbladder
    I cited the response that @Stumble and @yza got and asked for clarification. If you want the verbatim email I sent I can DM it to you @aaprabhakar. Have they not responded to your email?
  15. wittgensteinsbladder
    Maybe they meant you needed to have started the application to qualify?
  16. wittgensteinsbladder
    I got this response from the office: "Thank you for your message. I apologize for the confusion. The deadline has been extended to the 12th."
  17. wittgensteinsbladder
    Wait what?? This doesn't make any sense and definitely wasn't mentioned in the email they sent.
  18. wittgensteinsbladder
    Are you MPA or MIA candidate? Have any MPAs gotten these types of questions?
  19. wittgensteinsbladder
    I'm taking the extra time. I don't think it can reflect negatively if they've changed the deadline.
  20. wittgensteinsbladder
    It’s from the same email that confirmed which materials I was missing yesterday, so it couldn’t be fake or anything. Maybe MPA applications are down?
  21. wittgensteinsbladder
    I got this too, and was just about to ask the same thing. It seems too good to be true, but I’d be happy for an extra week of polishing! Trying to decide if I should take it or just submit now.
  22. wittgensteinsbladder
    I'm not sure what you mean? That post appears to be from 2016 (Dec. 16th not 19th at that) and is on their old website rather than the current one. Am I not seeing something?
  23. wittgensteinsbladder
    Looks like we have our answer: https://harris.uchicago.edu/admissions/blog/early-action-review-and-decision-release At least I’ll be able to focus again at work and night classes rather than just hitting refresh haha.
  24. wittgensteinsbladder
    Yeah I saw that. I was hoping that date was to just give the adcom some extra leeway and also to send the rejections out on the 22nd. I think the wait is just getting to my head so I’m inventing things to look forward to.
  25. wittgensteinsbladder
    Any chance that acceptances go out tomorrow?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use

  I accept