
Sepal
Members-
Posts
11 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Profile Information
-
Location
Illiniois
-
Application Season
2019 Fall
-
Program
Developmental Psychology/Personality
Recent Profile Visitors
1,166 profile views
Sepal's Achievements

Decaf (2/10)
4
Reputation
-
dakotaS reacted to a post in a topic: Volunteering in POI's lab before applying?
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: What are people's experiences being waitlisted?
-
Volunteering in POI's lab before applying?
Sepal replied to dancedementia's topic in Psychology Forum
Try if you have the time and funding to support you. For me, I worked with the potential supervisor for one semester, and during this period, I was involved in the lab meeting, manuscript writing, data analysis. It gave me a better understanding of her mentorship style (which is super important for 4-6 years PhD), lab air and living environment at that town. No matter you are accepted or not, you will have a greater exposure which helps you view things differently. Go for it! -
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Volunteering in POI's lab before applying?
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Psy.D programs- please help me decide!
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Declining to reapply next year
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Relieved to have decided ... yet crushed
-
Hey! I talked about that with a professor and several PhDs before. Because the professor and I have very close research interest and we had a great time working together. I was about to retake the GRE (V153, Q160) before December. She assured me that it was enough and we can concentrate on pubs. I cannot exclude the possibility that they may have lower standards for international students and non-clinical programs. But I do suggest you to approach potential supervisors. To communicate your interests in their labs (maybe you have already worked in their labs! Talk to the most relevant person! ) and see how they feel about your background and your decision to be take another 2 years RA position. Another factor you need to consider is how the school select applicants, whether the committee has more say or the supervisor. If it's the former, then you need to raise your GRE scores or maybe have strong reasons to persuade them why your undergrad GPA/GRE was not so good in your PS/SOP. (suggestion from Stanford Psy PhD.) Btw, do you mind me asking why you want to apply in two years instead of this cycle or earlier, considering all the excellent experiences and pubs you had? Good luck!
- 13 replies
-
- gre
- clinical psychology
-
(and 2 more)
Tagged with:
-
Sophie Su reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Yes, invites sent out. And this is for Evanston campus.
-
An update on Northwestern (personal email from POI): We have completed our initial review of applicants and the committee made selections for on-campus interviews. At this time, you are#1 on my waiting list; I anticipate I will have more information for you in the new year, so we will keep in touch on that topic, ok? No matter the outcome for this year, I hope we can pursue the analyses and papers, which are of interest to us both and will certainly strengthen your position as an incoming PhD student (this cycle or next!) Questions here! 1) why are people shortlisted? And if the professor will accept 1 student each year, how many candidate are interviewed for this professor’s lab? 1? I assume? And is my professor in charge of her shortlist or the committee? 2) The professor mentioned that the two papers that I proposed to working on will strengthen my position as an incoming PhD student, both this cycle and next. Specifically, how will it strengthen my position this cycle (as I am already been shortlisted)? 3) How would you respond to this email, personally? (Well there is possibility that I may have several offers eventually) Thanks! Good luck to all of us!
-
Hi Sophie, Don't worry! As I know (I checked that before), as long as you submit your application on time, other supplementary materials (e.g., official score reports, recommendation letters) could arrive a bit late and that will not affect your application status! I assure you that's not auto-rejection.
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Wow, that's a lot! Thanks for sharing! Good luck!
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Sepal reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
ASDadvocate reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
reaching44 reacted to a post in a topic: Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
This is for Northwestern Department of Psychology all PhD programs. If that one is listed under this department, then I would say yes.
-
I made it! Thanks a bunch! That's very nice of you! Good luck to your applications! XD
-
Update about Northwestern: " The applications are in the first round of reviews. Emails should be sent out later this week inviting candidates to an interview next year. " (Hoather, 2018)
-
Sepal started following Fall 2019 Psychology PhD Applicants!
-
Hi guys. Newcomer here. Here are the programs and PI initials I applied and also my personal experiences. Wish to gain some useful advice here! I am expecting to know someone who applied the same program or same school!! Applied: Minnesota (PIB, MS), Northwestern (PD&H,OR), UCSC (Developmental, MZ) Visited: Northwestern (as full-time RA) Accepted: Waitlisted: Rejected: Stats: 3.65 overall GPA | 3.91 Psychology GPA | 153V, 3.0AW |1 paper, 2 conferences (1 oral presentation) | 3 years research experience Research Interests: identity development among adolescents, master narrative (gender & race), socialization of identity, identity-based intervention, cross-cultural studies BTW, how can I put this into signature? For the coming year (and years following if not admitted), I will still seeking more research experience and currently I have several RA job interviews. And probably I will retake the exams next year but I really question the validity and reliability of GRE..If I became a professor one day, I would not list it as a application requirement XD