-
Posts
156 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
3,836 profile views
thehegeldialectic's Achievements
Latte (6/10)
79
Reputation
-
Marcus_Aurelius reacted to a post in a topic: Thoughts on The New School for Social Research's MA program?
-
philosopuppy reacted to a post in a topic: Dear 2015 applicants, here is what we have learned from the 2014 season
-
I got a call from one program and then an email from the rest. One of the schools emailed to set up an interview (unfortunately it went to an old email account from the previous time I registered and I luckily saw it at the last second!).
-
gvg reacted to a post in a topic: Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
-
Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
thehegeldialectic replied to SlumberingTrout's topic in Philosophy
Good luck with your career having this attitude. -
Neither Here Nor There reacted to a post in a topic: Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
-
Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
thehegeldialectic replied to SlumberingTrout's topic in Philosophy
Only because continental programs aren't placed on the ranking. Fordham is a great program with a strong reputation. -
Did you do it through the website, or email them?
-
total_ noob reacted to a post in a topic: MA GPA
-
Swann reacted to a post in a topic: Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
-
SlumberingTrout reacted to a post in a topic: Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
-
Final Decisions / Accepting Offers Fall 2018!
thehegeldialectic replied to SlumberingTrout's topic in Philosophy
Accepted Villanova. Declined Duquesne, Kentucky, South Florida, USI Carbondale, and removed myself from the wait list at Loyola and UC Riverside. So the final score is a5/2w/r7 out of 14. Pretty good season, I'd say. -
Wow, that's kind of insane.
-
I know that some MA programs, especially the funded ones, do not practice grade inflation. It has something to do with the reputation/ability of the program to place their students and provide a measure of their ability. I made a 4.0 in my MA, but don't know what my colleagues are making. I think the standard practices is to give an A- if a student could have or should have done better.
-
Needle in the Hay reacted to a post in a topic: Leiter's ad hominem against critics
-
lyellgeo reacted to a post in a topic: Leiter's ad hominem against critics
-
Swann reacted to a post in a topic: Leiter's ad hominem against critics
-
Since we know that Leiter personally hates continental philosophy, this should come as no surprise. The rankings are bullshit. The obvious intention behind their design is to create the false image that all "serious" continental philosophy is being done by Dreyfus, Pippin, Rorty, or Brandom.
-
Both of these claims are false. The top schools listed are all "analytic" schools with a few continental people on the side. In the case of Irvine, there is LITERALLY ONE PERSON working on Husserl, and the rest of the faculty are analytic. They do not list the top continental schools, such as DePaul, Villanova, Duquesne, Emory, or Boston College. These programs aren't even mentioned on the list. Your second point is pure propaganda.
-
It's nice to see Leiter has learned to start using his words, rather than his poop, to make ridiculous ad hominem attacks. (For those not in the loop: https://www.buzzfeed.com/katiejmbaker/professors-receive-packets-of-poop?utm_term=.rtkYRQWre#.xjEMn2qv0 )
-
Rejected Vanderbilt. Already made my decision and don't really want to go there anyways, so whatever. Wish they would have had the decency to tell me earlier.
-
I would also advise you to completely ignore rankings, especially Leiter's. Instead, I would try to determine (from talking to current students at Kingston) how much you actually get to work with these big named people. Of course, if you have a letter of recommendation from someone like Balibar or Malabou, this could be very good for applying to programs in the tradition of continental philosophy, especially programs that emphasize the French tradition. However, there's a growing number of programs that allow students to study with big name figures at a significant cost (such as the European Graduate School or the New School for Social Research) that can have some downsides when it comes to faculty availability, tuition rates, and the level of engagement/competition among your peers (I have heard there was a major controversy, which involved Ranciere and Badiou leaving the EGS). That's not to say that you can't go to one of these programs and succeed, nor is this to say that Kingston is like this (I have heard nothing to indicate this about Kingston). Just that sometimes programs that offer you a chance to study with the biggest names in philosophy sometimes are funded by the fact that people are *paying* for the opportunity to study under one of the greats, so you have to be careful. But again, I heave heard nothing to indicate this about Kingston, and if you are excited about the faculty (I certainly would be), it might be a great choice.
-
Nope. As I understand it, they had two tiers on the waitlist, those interviewed and those not interviewed.
-
Still waiting on Vanderbilt, USI Carbondale, and ... University of Memphis (who I'd equally forgotten about). Have already accepted an offer, so now I'm just curious.