Jump to content

2018 Acceptance/Rejection Thread


mynameismyname

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, philoguy said:

Is it appropriate to follow up on applications and inquire into the specifics of why you were rejected?

Yes, especially if you are planning to apply out next year. I’ve emailed a few schools and about half of them responded and the information that I received was helpful, at least in one case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Plslol said:

When it comes time to apply again for those of us shut out of phd programs, is it recommended against to use the same, but edited, writing sample?

I'm just a pleb and this is my first cycle, but I'm going to use the paper I produce for the Michaelmas term of my MSt. I had a lot of things weighing down on me that kept me from working on my writing sample last semester, and I just think it's a bad idea to try to resurrect it. I think the general answer here is, though, that it doesn't matter one bit, as long as it's significantly better than your first sample and you've gone through 10+ drafts of it read by professors with some standing and experience in the discipline (or at the very least the best professors available to you). My problems this cycle were: lack of pedigree, poor sample, and bad fit. The first thing is out of my (and your(?)) control. I had no idea going into college that going to a small liberal arts college that, while prestigious, didn't have a ranked PhD program, would hurt me SIGNIFICANTLY. The other two things, however, are in my control, and hence the things I'll work on. I'd probably encourage you to do the same. Write up a brilliant sample and put in the extra hours to explain in your SoP why you're a good fit for the program (and do try to make your sample subject be your AOI).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Prose said:

Write up a brilliant sample and put in the extra hours to explain in your SoP why you're a good fit for the program (and do try to make your sample subject be your AOI).

What I'm beginning to wonder is how and who to try to convince to review my next sample over and over again once I have graduated in May.  Should I just cut to the chase and hit up my POI's from the depts where I got rejected and ask them for comments?  If I have one good idea in my life please let this be it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, LORDBACON said:

What I'm beginning to wonder is how and who to try to convince to review my next sample over and over again once I have graduated in May.  Should I just cut to the chase and hit up my POI's from the depts where I got rejected and ask them for comments?  If I have one good idea in my life please let this be it.

That's not a bad idea, but from experience last year they don't tend to give anything too substantial (makes sense, they don't want everyone asking for detailed comments) beyond 'you can improve on it more'. I would focus on working with people you personally work with, and either developing a new idea or revising and polishing your current one. But that's just my own opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, LORDBACON said:

What I'm beginning to wonder is how and who to try to convince to review my next sample over and over again once I have graduated in May.  Should I just cut to the chase and hit up my POI's from the depts where I got rejected and ask them for comments?  If I have one good idea in my life please let this be it.

I would present it at a conference or colloquium (several if possible). That should give you some really good feedback and let you know what parts are interesting and where you can look for improvement. Next, ask your friends or colleagues for feedback. Finally, it's hard to get professors to take the time (and sometimes for them to be honest), but it's worth a shot.

11 hours ago, Plslol said:

When it comes time to apply again for those of us shut out of phd programs, is it recommended against to use the same, but edited, writing sample?


I would say no. You might try to rework  the argument of the current sample or  improve the engagement with the literature, and take the same general idea to the next level, but I think it's a bad idea to try to play the exact same hand again. 

Some exceptions might be if:

(a) You only applied to a few programs, enough to not rule out bad luck.
(b) You were waitlisted at several programs, suggesting that they might have liked the sample, but couldn't squeeze you in.
(c) You are applying to different programs, ones more suited to your interests. 

If you apply to the same program with the same writing sample, they might reject you for the same reason.

I will say that when I applied two years ago before my MA, I thought my writing sample was perfect. Two years later, I see that, despite its strengths, it contained a major/flaw oversight that I was only able to recognize by engaging more with the literature. 
 

1 hour ago, Hekkue said:

What is up with the one rejection reported from Vanderbilt? Do you guys think it was a mistake or spam?  

It's not the last minute, which means we can definitely rule out Vanderbilt sending rejections. Therefore it's either spam or they wrote the department and asked. 

Edited by iunoionnis
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My status still hasn't changed nor have I received an email from Notre Dame after all the rejects, waitlists, and accepts. Why are they torturing me. Also, all their accepts (at least here on GC) have perfect 170V GRE scores. I wonder if that's coincidence, I know they highly value GRE scores but dang!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Xia1 said:

My status still hasn't changed nor have I received an email from Notre Dame after all the rejects, waitlists, and accepts. Why are they torturing me. Also, all their accepts (at least here on GC) have perfect 170V GRE scores. I wonder if that's coincidence, I know they highly value GRE scores but dang!

My verbal was 166 and i've been accepted at Notre Dame (which I will decline). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Metanoia said:

Congratulations! :) Is this your first PhD acceptance in this cycle? And are you going for the visit?

It is! I'd been pretty hopeless so far because I'm coming straight from a small liberal arts college without a graduate program in philosophy. I was pretty much accepting my fate of doing the MSt but this is honestly just a better offer. I probably won't go to the visit, just not enough time in the day this semester :(

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Really heartbroken about not hearing back from Stanford since it was my top choice. Still holding out hope for a waitlist. Do any of the admitted folk know if they're done?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Prose said:

It is! I'd been pretty hopeless so far because I'm coming straight from a small liberal arts college without a graduate program in philosophy. I was pretty much accepting my fate of doing the MSt but this is honestly just a better offer. I probably won't go to the visit, just not enough time in the day this semester :(

Yes, this is clearly a better offer. It's very hard to get funding at Oxford anyway. I take it that you're interested in ancient philosophy (me too!), and Cornell's ancient philosophy program is top notch. I don't think I'll be visiting either because the visit clashes with Harvard's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see a lot of people with Notre Dame waitlists, and some new Notre Dame rejections. I still haven't received any information from them. Anyone got a inkling for why this might be the case? A hidden waitlist perhaps?

I also haven't heard from Cornell yet. Not sure what to make of this either.

Good news is, I got waitlisted at U Texas Austin!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use