gillymon Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 ... Is it safe to assume that most interview invitations have been sent out now this week is nearly over? I NEED CLOSURE :/ Rejection emails actually sound great. (In other news, looking forward to meeting people TPCB and Weill interviews )
ozhyna Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 (edited) tsusanto53, still, last year they were sendinf interview invitations from 9th to 15th January. here: MIT Biology will finish sending their mails by today (Friday Jan 9th). Edited January 10, 2015 by ozhyna
berba9 Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 How do you know this? Have they even begun sending invitations? "When we are down to the 100-125 we will need the official scores and look for them on our end. For those who have not sent at that point, they should send promptly once receiving an invitation. Those invited should hear by Friday, January 9th." I had sent them a mail in November about an unrelated topic, this is a part of the reply. To be honest, I was also surprised at the fact that there's almost nothing on the results page here about MIT biology. Harvard MCO (molecules, cells and organisms) are also done sending invites, so that's another rejection, though no official rejection letter has been sent. "I can confirm for you that the invitations to interview with the graduate program have been sent." Was a mail they sent yesterday in response.
expandyourmind Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Anyone know if Princeton@Biology is completely done? I'm hopeful, but at this point I'm just assuming a rejection is headed my way
NeuroMedic Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 ... Is it safe to assume that most interview invitations have been sent out now this week is nearly over? I NEED CLOSURE :/ Rejection emails actually sound great. (In other news, looking forward to meeting people TPCB and Weill interviews ) My understanding is a lot of programs send out interview invites in waves, so they may well continue into next week and throughout January. It sucks to be kept waiting. Also, unfortunately, it looks like a decent number of programs wait to send out rejections until late Feb/early March (ugh)... Congrats on the interviews though!
Illusionev Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Any news from Harvard Chemical Biology yet? Thanks
biorelated Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 Has anyone else heard from MIT microbiology? It looks like someone has heard from them on Jan.9...wondering if they finished sending invites as MIT biology did?? Biochemistry 1
Biochemistry Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 I applied to MIT biochem, haven't heard anything. I guess we'd be under bio? Biochemistry 1
Meep_Meep Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 I still find it a bit hard to believe that MIT Biology has sent all of the invites when I have only seen one person on the results page get an interview, shouldn't there at least be a couple people who got the interviews here? Biochemistry 1
Biochemistry Posted January 10, 2015 Posted January 10, 2015 That's what I'm thinking, swaye. Biochemistry 1
velli Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Someone posted that interview status for UCSF's iPQB is up on the application site. Mine was there as well. elkheart 1
Darren Xu Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Any news from Harvard Chemical Biology yet? Thanks No news yet. Someone said the interview invitation was sent out on the third week of January two years ago. They should be coming soon.
elkheart Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Someone posted that interview status for UCSF's iPQB is up on the application site. Mine was there as well. Thank you! Mine was updated as well - I would not have noticed without your post
Meep_Meep Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 Now I've seen several MIT results go up, I guess I believe the Jan. 9th thing after all, oh well!
lilbert5 Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 interview to GW-NIH partnership program! Dreams of the North 1
future.grad.student Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 interview to GW-NIH partnership program! Wow!!! Congrats! All the best!
gliaful Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 There is a delightful article published in Neuron called "How to be a Graduate Advisee" -- it's a thoughtful flip-side of the coin to "How to Pick a Graduate Advisor", recently mentioned by PeterPanComplex in the Neuro Applicants forum. Although both papers were published in Neuron, the advice given seems applicable to all of the fields represented in this forum. While interview invites continue to trickle in, and some of us are soon to begin or have already begun interview season, both of these papers may be helpful and I have linked them below: How to be a Graduate Advisee, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627313011914 How to Pick a Graduate Advisor, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0896627313009070 Both are open-access to my knowledge. lzerimar, PeterPanComplex, Dreams of the North and 4 others 7
Crucial BBQ Posted January 11, 2015 Posted January 11, 2015 (edited) I still find it a bit hard to believe that MIT Biology has sent all of the invites when I have only seen one person on the results page get an interview, shouldn't there at least be a couple people who got the interviews here? The biology program at MIT gets a lot of applications. I don't remember the exact figure but it is over 3K iirc. With all grad programs combined, the total number of applications is ~25K (I added 1K to adjust for an increase, otherwise it was ~24K in the 2013-2014 cycle) with only 3,320 being offered admission. http://web.mit.edu/facts/admission.html There are only 1, 095 total doctoral students studying science at MIT and whopping 5 Master's students. That number is for all science Ph.D.s, not just biology. My guess is that the majority of MIT applicants are not members of Grad Cafe and of those who are most probably do not want to admit they were rejected (or in this case, not offered an interview). When it comes to things that are self-reported, it is more likely to self-report if one agrees with the outcome or receives a strong emotional response otherwise. I would also guess that many Grad Cafe members are not posting all of their results, if any at all, in particular if they may feel embarrassed by it. I only posted one result last year and that was only because I waited, without word either way, until mid-May for that decision. That ticked me off and I posted just to leave a snarky comment as a heads-up to future applicants. Edited January 11, 2015 by Crucial BBQ tito balisimo, Biochemistry and Biohacker 2 1
Ascinflamm Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 (edited) It is uninformative to try and calculate stats for MIT's biology program based on the overall stats of all graduate programs, or of the entire school of science for that matter. Remember that each program forms its own committee and conducts its admission business independently of other departments. For example, MIT's material science department just hands out offers of admission to their top candidates without an interview process. There are about 240 current PhD students in MIT Biology across all years. So that's about 40 incoming students per year, which means they probably admit 80 or more students per year. I don't think they release the number of applicants (or of invited interviewees) though. The biology program at MIT gets a lot of applications. I don't remember the exact figure but it is over 3K iirc. With all grad programs combined, the total number of applications is ~25K (I added 1K to adjust for an increase, otherwise it was ~24K in the 2013-2014 cycle) with only 3,320 being offered admission. http://web.mit.edu/facts/admission.html There are only 1, 095 total doctoral students studying science at MIT and whopping 5 Master's students. That number is for all science Ph.D.s, not just biology. My guess is that the majority of MIT applicants are not members of Grad Cafe and of those who are most probably do not want to admit they were rejected (or in this case, not offered an interview). When it comes to things that are self-reported, it is more likely to self-report if one agrees with the outcome or receives a strong emotional response otherwise. I would also guess that many Grad Cafe members are not posting all of their results, if any at all, in particular if they may feel embarrassed by it. I only posted one result last year and that was only because I waited, without word either way, until mid-May for that decision. That ticked me off and I posted just to leave a snarky comment as a heads-up to future applicants. Edited January 12, 2015 by Ascinflamm
Crucial BBQ Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 (edited) It is uninformative to try and calculate stats for MIT's biology program based on the overall stats of all graduate programs, or of the entire school of science for that matter. Remember that each program forms its own committee and conducts its admission business independently of other departments. For example, MIT's material science department just hands out offers of admission to their top candidates without an interview process. There are about 240 current PhD students in MIT Biology across all years. So that's about 40 incoming students per year, which means they probably admit 80 or more students per year. I don't think they release the number of applicants (or of invited interviewees) though. I was only offering one idea to why there may be a lack of updates on the Results page is all. Edited January 12, 2015 by Crucial BBQ
ilovelab Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 I was only offering one idea to why there may be a lack of updates on the Results page is all. Also, maybe this year fewer people applied to MIT bio who are on grad cafe. Crucial BBQ 1
nns91 Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 Hey guys, anyone know much about the reputation of NYU Sackler in the community?
expandyourmind Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 Hey guys, anyone know much about the reputation of NYU Sackler in the community? I'm interviewing at Sackler. All I know is the research ranking from the medical school (which is pretty damn strong). Other than that, I have no idea... Would love to know, also! I just applied because its in NYC.
profneuron Posted January 12, 2015 Posted January 12, 2015 Hello, Does anyone hear back from the U of Arizona after the Skype interview? I did the Skype interview and was told I would be hearing back in a week. Now it has been a month but nothing came out...I only saw the post about Skype interview and one rejection. Thanks!
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now