Jump to content

2018-2019 Application Thread


Leo9

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, eggsalad14 said:

Lol I mean it was me, I guess my messages earlier were vague about that. I'm just surprised that no one else has heard because my portal is now updated and everything, and it's not like I've won some special wustl award or have had contact with any faculty that would warrant an early notification.  

Wow.  I’m really curious about what’s making your app stand out so much.  You’ve been killing it out here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Dwar said:

Random question from what you said, does ranking matter much in the non-academic market place? Like in policy/government or think-tank work?

Hard to say because I’m not in that marketplace, but I’d imagine it matters to the extent of name recognition.  Maybe more so for think tanks because they try to keep one foot in academia.  I would imagine it matters less than if you were looking for a tenure track job though, as long as you develop the same skills.  Non academics are less obsessed with “pedigree”. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, IcedCovfefe said:

Hard to say because I’m not in that marketplace, but I’d imagine it matters to the extent of name recognition.  Maybe more so for think tanks because they try to keep one foot in academia.  I would imagine it matters less than if you were looking for a tenure track job though, as long as you develop the same skills.  Non academics are less obsessed with “pedigree”. 

That makes a lot of sense. I know that at least for some government jobs (EX: Foreign Service) it doesn't matter where you get your degree from, as long as you have one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

1 minute ago, IcedCovfefe said:

Hard to say because I’m not in that marketplace, but I’d imagine it matters to the extent of name recognition.  Maybe more so for think tanks because they try to keep one foot in academia.  I would imagine it matters less than if you were looking for a tenure track job though, as long as you develop the same skills.  Non academics are less obsessed with “pedigree”. 

In politics, alma mater matters very little, especially once you get past your first job. I have worked in public affairs/public policy since the late 90s, and people care more about who you know and what you've proven you can do on the job than they do about pedigree. A big name college education makes very little difference in DC. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, eggsalad14 said:

Lol I mean it was me, I guess my messages earlier were vague about that. I'm just surprised that no one else has heard because my portal is now updated and everything, and it's not like I've won some special wustl award or have had contact with any faculty that would warrant an early notification.  

Oops, I misinterpreted your initial post. Congratulations! Whichever school snatches you up is going to feel mighty proud! Maybe it's something like they've only sent out notifications for those in American, then it would make sense that there could be very few (and maybe just you active here). I suppose the rest of us will hear back before long. I have to admit, I agree with departments that don't send rejections on Valentine's Day?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Dwar said:

Random question from what you said, does ranking matter much in the non-academic market place? Like in policy/government or think-tank work?

Much less so but I would strongly advise against getting a political science Ph.D. with the intent of going into policy/government. It's unnecessary and incredibly expensive in terms of opportunity cost. If this is your intent I would encourage you to think deeply about why you really want a poli. sci. ph.d. as the only good reason to get one in my opinion is to be doing scientific research.

The marketplace outside of academia cares much more about the tangible skills you bring to the table (i.e. stats, programming, salesmanship, etc.). To acquire these skills you're better off either getting an MA or Ph.D. in another field. If you want to be a subject matter expert for some consulting firm or go in the foreign service, a masters degree in a poli sci field is sufficient and a Ph.D. is overkill without adding much value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, oats said:

Much less so but I would strongly advise against getting a political science Ph.D. with the intent of going into policy/government. It's unnecessary and incredibly expensive in terms of opportunity cost. If this is your intent I would encourage you to think deeply about why you really want a poli. sci. ph.d. as the only good reason to get one in my opinion is to be doing scientific research.

The marketplace outside of academia cares much more about the tangible skills you bring to the table (i.e. stats, programming, salesmanship, etc.). To acquire these skills you're better off either getting an MA or Ph.D. in another field. If you want to be a subject matter expert for some consulting firm or go in the foreign service, a masters degree in a poli sci field is sufficient and a Ph.D. is overkill without adding much value.

Thanks for the advice! i'll definitely consider it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, IcedCovfefe said:

Additionally, if you’ve been not receiving acceptances, this could be a big reason.  If you indicated in your SOP that you don’t intend to stay in academia, then you likely won’t receive much interest. 

I was warned about that early on, and I avoided it in the SOP's. It isn't that I necessarily don't want to go into academia, its just that the way the academic market is trending, it is harder and harder to get a TT position. So I figure if I work for a few years in industry and then try out academia, i'll be a better candidate. My passion mainly is in research, I love doing it and its what I want to do for my career. Honestly i'm not too picky about what industry thats in, if its in a research university, think tank, or government agency. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, usmeme said:

Just an email from the DGS. It says there will be a follow-up email that covers more details about the open house and the funding package.

 

1 minute ago, irgradcafe said:

Claiming Cornell as well for IR subfield. Got an email from DGS, and formal letter of acceptance with funding details will come later. Super happy - I didn't even think I have a chance at Cornell!

 

Congrats to both of you!! That's so exciting. Off to go refresh my inbox furiously ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Those of you who applied Stanford - go check your application portal. Just like some other people on the results page I found a rejection letter sitting there. Hope you guys would find an acceptance though! Didn't even bother to send us a generic rejection email, eh?

Edited by irgradcafe
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, irgradcafe said:

Those of you who applied Stanford - go check your application portal. Just like some other people on the results page I found a rejection letter sitting there. Hope you guys would find an acceptance though! Didn't even bother to send us a generic rejection email, eh?

Thanks for sharing the info! I checked and found the same... oh well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use