Jump to content

2017 Applicant Profiles and Admissions Results


Dank

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, charmquarkz said:

Wow congrats!!! I applied too and haven't received an invitation... but, the day isn't *quite* over so I won't give up hope just yet!

I emailed them because of the overlap with Gatech recruitment, and they sent me the invitation as reply

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, SysEvo said:

I emailed them because of the overlap with Gatech recruitment, and they sent me the invitation as reply

Oh! Perhaps I should consider doing the same... I have a similar concern with two other recruiting events which coincide with both of MIT Micro's! Also looks like we've applied to a few of the same programs. Good luck! :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, charmquarkz said:

Oh! Perhaps I should consider doing the same... I have a similar concern with two other recruiting events which coincide with both of MIT Micro's! Also looks like we've applied to a few of the same programs. Good luck! :)

Thanks! You too! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just was sent the list of professors that will be interviewing me for a recruiting weekend in an umbrella program. However, only 1/3 is one I actually requested/want to work with. The other 2 have interesting research but not what I want to do. Is the interview for the sole purpose of identifying a potential supervisor? Will I ruin my chances of being accepted if I tell these professors I wouldn't want to do a rotation with them? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, bionerd111 said:

I just was sent the list of professors that will be interviewing me for a recruiting weekend in an umbrella program. However, only 1/3 is one I actually requested/want to work with. The other 2 have interesting research but not what I want to do. Is the interview for the sole purpose of identifying a potential supervisor? Will I ruin my chances of being accepted if I tell these professors I wouldn't want to do a rotation with them? 

I'm sure someone who has already gone through the interview process will comment but it is my understanding that these interviews aren't strictly with potential mentors... I am scheduled to meet with several faculty in the department I applied to but that are completely outside my area of research.  They could be part of the admissions committee or simply faculty who have been tasked to "get to know you" and how you discuss your science for the purposes of deciding whether or not to admit you! I wouldn't flat out say that you don't want to work with them, as that might not be the intention to begin with. Although if they ask you if you would like to do a rotation in their lab, I'm not sure exactly how you should address the fact that you are not interested (perhaps someone who has been in this situation can help!)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, bionerd111 said:

I just was sent the list of professors that will be interviewing me for a recruiting weekend in an umbrella program. However, only 1/3 is one I actually requested/want to work with. The other 2 have interesting research but not what I want to do. Is the interview for the sole purpose of identifying a potential supervisor? Will I ruin my chances of being accepted if I tell these professors I wouldn't want to do a rotation with them? 

I'm sure every program is a little different, but I interviewed at an umbrella program this weekend and the interviews were more just to assess your ability to talk about research. Most of my interviewers asked me off the bat what sort of research I was most interested in and even if it wasn't directly aligned with their field we still had great discussions about my current research and their research. Even if you don't want to work with them, you can learn something about their research and show you can have conversation about a variety of scientific topics. I don't think anyone would ask you at this point if you want to rotate in their lab as these decisions are usually much later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zam330 said:

 I read his most recent publications and gave a 1-2 sentence summary, then posed a question along the lines of: " I’d be curious to see if there are other donors to the electron pool in relation to ATP synthesis, other than the already determined ones (I obviously named those in detail)" because a paper mentioned that inhibiting one of the determined donors led to equivalent amounts of ATP generated.  In a different app I posed a question along the lines of: "I'd be interested in determining environmental changes that would promote or impede the motility of the bacterium, which could be done by restricting key elements such as phosphorous."  

I'm still going through the the app process now, so I guess take this with a grain of salt, but that is MUCH more specific than what I wrote.  My statements were much more along the lines of "I'm interested in the work of Dr. X and Dr. Y, particularly their projects related to innate immunity." 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zam330 said:

I understand that this thread is for admission results, but it also gets the most traffic so I'm sorry in advance. 

After not hearing anything back from my top school choice, I'm trying to determine what area of my application could use some work.

 

What schools did you apply to?  I saw in another thread your undergraduate GPA is a 3.12, and your graduate is 3.90.  Can you state your GRE scores?  How many credit hours are your Masters?  Did you have a thesis as well? Also, are you domestic or international?  How are your LOR's? 

I don't think your SOP is the problem.  It could be you applied to a lot of schools that are competitive.  If you give more information about what I stated, it would be helpful.You could also PM me if you don't feel comfortable posting that information in the public. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, zam330 said:

I understand that this thread is for admission results, but it also gets the most traffic so I'm sorry in advance. 

After not hearing anything back from my top school choice, I'm trying to determine what area of my application could use some work.  The only potential problem I could see would be with my statement of purpose, specifically my research interests and why I want to go to that school.  I'm interested in studying microbial life of extreme environments, and how that could relate to the environments of other planets.  This is quite vague, so I chose 1-2 professors whose research I was interested in (specifically one at this school).  I read his most recent publications and gave a 1-2 sentence summary, then posed a question along the lines of: " I’d be curious to see if there are other donors to the electron pool in relation to ATP synthesis, other than the already determined ones (I obviously named those in detail)" because a paper mentioned that inhibiting one of the determined donors led to equivalent amounts of ATP generated.  In a different app I posed a question along the lines of: "I'd be interested in determining environmental changes that would promote or impede the motility of the bacterium, which could be done by restricting key elements such as phosphorous."  

Did I misinterpret how I should go about stating my interests?  The thing is, I don't have a very specific set of interests. I'm open to molding my research based on the topics that my potential advisor is interested in.  I'm aware that unlike when I was choosing master's research based on projects available, a PhD advisor expects you to create your own project.  In my SOP I  wanted to show that I understand what is going on, and that I can develop a potential question relative to their research, even if it may be a small contribution to the subject.  

Hoping someone else can offer something up since  this is something I'm worrying about as well. I have an almost certain rejection from one place I applied and I'm starting to see interviews going out for another program. 

I also only applied to a lowish number (4) because I have very specific research interests and those places were the only places that matched those interests. I'm starting to become concerned that I've bottle-necked myself.

I was also under the impression that it would seem better to be able to put forth a proposal; however, my research interests are quite a bit outside everyone elses' in these threads. 

Good luck with the remainder of your applications! 

 

ETA- just saw your post. With the GRE score, most people acknowledge that it is not a good indicator of your abilities as a researcher but some institutions and departments (especially those who get a lot of apps) will most definitely use that to cut the deck and thin out the applications.  That score is quite low for someone in STEM and immediately stands out to me. Now, of course you can get into a program with those GRE scores, just like it is possible to get into a program with a lower GPA, but it definitely isn't helping. 

Edited by Marshall
Link to comment
Share on other sites

BTW, I just want to note that Zam, even with your GRE scores, there are schools that will take you with your academic record (especially since you have a Masters, research experience, ect.)  It's just that you only applied to 3 very competitive schools/programs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, zam330 said:

I understand that this thread is for admission results, but it also gets the most traffic so I'm sorry in advance. 

After not hearing anything back from my top school choice, I'm trying to determine what area of my application could use some work.  The only potential problem I could see would be with my statement of purpose, specifically my research interests and why I want to go to that school.  I'm interested in studying microbial life of extreme environments, and how that could relate to the environments of other planets.  This is quite vague, so I chose 1-2 professors whose research I was interested in (specifically one at this school).  I read his most recent publications and gave a 1-2 sentence summary, then posed a question along the lines of: " I’d be curious to see if there are other donors to the electron pool in relation to ATP synthesis, other than the already determined ones (I obviously named those in detail)" because a paper mentioned that inhibiting one of the determined donors led to equivalent amounts of ATP generated.  In a different app I posed a question along the lines of: "I'd be interested in determining environmental changes that would promote or impede the motility of the bacterium, which could be done by restricting key elements such as phosphorous."  

Did I misinterpret how I should go about stating my interests?  The thing is, I don't have a very specific set of interests. I'm open to molding my research based on the topics that my potential advisor is interested in.  I'm aware that unlike when I was choosing master's research based on projects available, a PhD advisor expects you to create your own project.  In my SOP I  wanted to show that I understand what is going on, and that I can develop a potential question relative to their research, even if it may be a small contribution to the subject.  

Can you comment on your previous research experience? Have you been doing this kind of research already? From the description you provided of your SOP, it sounds like you certainly did a good job explaining your interests, but how much did you talk about your practical/theoretical experience and how it ties into those interests? I ask because I am switching to geobiology/astrobiology/origins-of-life research myself from a completely different area of biology (mostly regenerative medicine and cancer biology), so the challenge for me has been justifying the disconnect between my practical skills and true interests! In fact, the number one questions I have been asked by prospective mentors during interviews is "so why the change in interest?" and that's usually followed up by something along the lines of "how has your formal training so far prepared you to do research you have limited experience in?" I will add that I have been mostly successful so far, and I think the key has been not only being specific about my interests but why I think I'm qualified to pursue them as a doctoral student!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, zam330 said:

I applied to UW-Seattle Microbiology, UW-Seattle Oceanography, and University of S. Cal. MBBO.  These were the only schools that had research I was interested in. I personally don't see the point in applying somewhere just for the sake of getting a PhD.  I'm a domestic student.
Masters- GPA 4.0, 20 credit hours completed out of 36 ( started last spring and will finish this summer), and I'm on the back end of my thesis project after spending my summer in the lab. Received a grant and Teaching assistantships.
Undergrad- GPA 3.12 with strong upward trend, last 60 hours of course work which include my masters is a 3.95, undergrad research for a little over a year, rewarded a grant for it, poster at a big ASM conference. 
LORs- strong; my thesis advisor, a prolific prof at my university that I TA a course for, and a biochem prof to show cross departmental success
GRE- bad b/c I became interested in grad school in the fall of the year I applied, but I explained this briefly in my SOP. My assumption is that the GRE measures applicants coming straight from undergrad.  Q: 149 V: 147 W: 3.5
 

Also, I don't know if you've mentioned this already, but did you contact prospective mentors before applying to express your interest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use