Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
4 hours ago, buckinghamubadger said:

I'm surprised Brandeis doesn't get more love and have no idea why it is ranked in the 80s in the US News rankings. They have nine TT placements over the past five years, which is remarkable considering that the program currently has only ten doctoral students.

Well, I haven't even heard of half of these universities (there's a couple of good placements, though). They have 15 faculty members. It's a tiny program. They don't have a methods sequence from the looks of their course catalog. Not that surprising really?

Eva Bellin's work is pretty cool though...

Edited by Comparativist
Posted
59 minutes ago, ilyosha said:

Kind of a silly question but...did they cold call you? Earlier today I got out of a movie with my SO only to see that I had missed repeated calls from a Tennessee area code, which seemed weird without any additional email, text, voicemail, etc.

I got a really friendly email from a Vanderbilt grad student asking if we could set up a time to talk over skype or facetime! It may be because I’m an international student though so it would be necessary to negotiate the time difference 

Posted (edited)

This sounds like a dumb question but I just got a really lovely email from an assisstant professor at one of my top choices. He signed off with his first name but it would be best to address him in my reply as “Professor X”, right? I usually wouldn’t ask but all three of my LOR profs have told me to address them by their first names when I stayed in touch with them post graduation and I’d noted that one of my TAs when I was an undergrad addressed the prof by his first name. I’m guessing I begin w “Professor X” though and maybe later would move on to first names if prompted. Ugh, I’m culturally conditoned to feel extremely uncomfortable addressing professors by their first name lol but wasn’t sure if this was expected of grad students.

Edited by cedfik
Posted
12 minutes ago, cedfik said:

This sounds like a dumb question but I just got a really lovely email from an assisstant professor at one of my top choices. He signed off with his first name but it would be best to address him in my reply as “Professor X”, right? I usually wouldn’t ask but all three of my LOR profs have told me to address them by their first names when I stayed in touch with them post graduation and I’d noted that one of my TAs when I was an undergrad addressed the prof by his first name. I’m guessing I begin w “Professor X” though and maybe later would move on to first names if prompted. Ugh, I’m culturally conditoned to feel extremely uncomfortable addressing professors by their first name lol but wasn’t sure if this was expected of grad students.

My feeling is that it's always best to continue with "Professor X" until someone explicitly tells you to address them by their first name. Although I am far more conservative on this than everyone I know, I think it simply never hurts to stay on "Professor" until told otherwise.

Posted
11 minutes ago, cedfik said:

This sounds like a dumb question but I just got a really lovely email from an assisstant professor at one of my top choices. He signed off with his first name but it would be best to address him in my reply as “Professor X”, right? I usually wouldn’t ask but all three of my LOR profs have told me to address them by their first names when I stayed in touch with them post graduation and I’d noted that one of my TAs when I was an undergrad addressed the prof by his first name. I’m guessing I begin w “Professor X” though and maybe later would move on to first names if prompted. Ugh, I’m culturally conditoned to feel extremely uncomfortable addressing professors by their first name lol but wasn’t sure if this was expected of grad students.

I second @ilyosha on this, though I've been culturally conditioned here in my country to call everyone by their first name haha 

Posted
8 minutes ago, ilyosha said:

My feeling is that it's always best to continue with "Professor X" until someone explicitly tells you to address them by their first name. Although I am far more conservative on this than everyone I know, I think it simply never hurts to stay on "Professor" until told otherwise.

 

4 minutes ago, Gik said:

I second @ilyosha on this, though I've been culturally conditioned here in my country to call everyone by their first name haha 

Thank you both! :P

Posted (edited)

 

38 minutes ago, skhann said:

Probably the slowest Sunday on this thread.

I guess it's time for the Sunday lookahead. Any thoughts about who we can expect to hear from this week? (Bonus question: how do you model the distribution of admissions decisions for a given department? (Don't answer that.))  

Very limited results skimming suggests that last year, Stanford, MIT, Yale and Columbia all released results on the Friday of the third week. I.e. this Friday.

Edited by Sartori
Posted
5 minutes ago, Sartori said:

 

I guess it's time for the Sunday lookahead. Any thoughts about who we can expect to hear from this week? (Bonus question: how do you model the distribution of admissions decisions for a given department? (Don't answer that.))  

:)

Anyway, I can only talk about my applications. Vanderbilt appears to have interviewed those it wanted to admit with chances of an invite getting slimmer. Minnesota is likely to announce by the end of this week or early next week.

Posted

Hi everyone! Long time lurker here--better late than never?? Thank you to everyone for keeping me (somewhat) sane during this application process filled with staggered acceptances, wait-lists, and rejections. @poliscibi I will be at GWU tomorrow, shoot me a PM if you want to discuss!

Posted
9 minutes ago, skhann said:

Minnesota is likely to announce by the end of this week or early next week.

Per Jessie Eastman, the graduate secretary at Minnesota, admissions decisions will be released the week of 2/19.

I feel like there's a decent chance that we will hear form Indiana this week. 

Posted
46 minutes ago, Sartori said:

 

I guess it's time for the Sunday lookahead. Any thoughts about who we can expect to hear from this week? (Bonus question: how do you model the distribution of admissions decisions for a given department? (Don't answer that.))  

Very limited results skimming suggests that last year, Stanford, MIT, Yale and Columbia all released results on the Friday of the third week. I.e. this Friday.

USC is very likely this week

Posted

It seems to me that the Following NRC S-Rank top 40 programs have yet to announce anything:

Stanford

Harvard

Columbia

Yale

MIT

Pitt

Rochester

Cornell

Minnesota

USC

UC Riverside

UChicago

Vaderbuilt 

Brown

Posted
36 minutes ago, izmir said:

I am not going. Why do they have to do it on a Monday smh?

I was thinking the same thing... really difficult

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. See our Privacy Policy and Terms of Use